Chicago Tribune “New laws Sprout as Homes Sit”

Robert Klein, CEO of Safeguard Properties, was quoted in a Chicago Tribune article about the difficulties in enforcing local ordinances with foreclosed properties.

New laws sprout as homes sit

But existing rules on vacancies often unenforced

By Mary Ellen Podmolik | Chicago Tribune reporter
August 24, 2008

Cece Edwards and her Chatham neighbors pride themselves on caring for their homes, but their block just doesn’t look like it once did.

Three residences are abandoned. Neighbors take turns picking up garbage and mowing the front yards, but they feel uneasy about the unsecured doors and fence-high weeds behind the buildings.

“You come out every day and you see this monstrosity thing going on, and you’re compelled to do something,” Edwards said. “The rest of the block is beautiful. It’s so sad. You’ve got really huge mortgage companies that own title to these properties and aren’t cleaning them up.”

Now communities large and small around the country, including Chicago, are passing laws designed to get tough with property owners. The ordinances look good on paper, but can they be enforced?

Consider this: Chicago already had an ordinance requiring owners of vacant property to register them with the city for $100 a year. The city’s building department estimates there are 10,000 vacant residential buildings in Chicago and only 1,500 are registered. City officials say that’s because the ordinance wasn’t heartily enforced.

In early November Chicago will have an even stricter law on its books. It calls for vacant property owners to register and pay $250 every six months. Higher fees will be assessed for code violations.

Enforcement also calls for what could be dramatic and visible changes in how vacant houses are secured.

For example, doors and windows can be boarded up with plywood only for the first six months of vacancy. After that owners must replace plywood with expensive steel panels or install windows and doors and a burglar alarm?a difficult endeavor where the power has been shut off. A large sign also must be posted identifying the owner and the person or company responsible for the property’s condition.

“Many of these buildings have been sitting vacant and unattended for five, six, 10 years,” said Richard Monocchio, acting commissioner of the city’s department of buildings. “It was time for the city to push these investors, these absentee landlords and in many cases, banks, to not just sit and wait for the market but to do something positive with these buildings so they wouldn’t have a [debilitating] effect on the neighbors.”

Monocchio hopes that the registration fees and fines will spur banks and other mortgage lenders to try to avoid foreclosures. “We hope one of the offshoots of this ordinance is a greater incentive on the part of the banking community to work with people that are in the house.”

Two months before it takes effect, the law already has naysayers.

“When you put a sign in front of your house, that’s the one they target to break in,” said Daryl Russell, a broker associate at Williamson Realty in South Holland. “That’s an open invitation that this is the one that is vacant.”

Russell said he tries to inspect his South Side foreclosure listings weekly for squatters. Break-ins by vandals and thieves also are common. At times, he said he’s had to wait for as long as 45 days to get reimbursed by property owners for thousands of dollars spent resecuring buildings.

“[The city] is missing the bigger problem,” Russell said. “How do we keep the people from going into properties? How do we keep people from losing the properties?”

Others question the wisdom of requiring steel doors.

“They’ll start stealing those doors. Right now they’re stealing all metal from those properties,” said Remi Gorys, president of A City Suburban Service Inc., which has been securing buildings for 15 years.

Flood of foreclosures

Chicago also will no longer grant work permits involving vacant buildings unless they are registered. And to gear up for the new law, residents will be reminded at aldermanic and block club meetings to call 311 to anonymously report vacant, unattended buildings.

South suburban Oak Forest passed a law in late July requiring owners to pay $200 to register vacant buildings. Neighbors had been cutting lawns at vacant homes, but with 78 foreclosed homes, Oak Forest has hired a firm to mow grass. The city is draining swimming pools that could pose safety hazards.

More such laws are expected around the Chicago area as the housing crisis deepens. Foreclosures in Chicago in July rose by 84 percent over their level in the same month two years ago. In the 60611 ZIP code on the city’s Near North side, for instance, the number of foreclosures filed has quadrupled, to 25 in July from 6 in the same month two years ago. During the same time frame, foreclosures in the 60659 ZIP code, which covers North Park and West Ridge, climbed 489 percent, to 53 from 9, according to data from RealtyTrac.

As reported Thursday, the Woodstock Institute, a Chicago-based non-profit that promotes community reinvestment, said in a report that the number of foreclosed properties going to auction in the five-county Chicago area climbed 98 percent between 2006 and 2007, to 13,727, and that it believes the trend is continuing this year. The finding is significant because it means many properties are ending up back with lenders rather than sold to buyers or investors who theoretically would be motivated to repair and maintain them.

Who’s the owner?

While on calls, Chicago’s 190 building inspectors will be expected to report addresses of vacant buildings they find so that the city can run title searches.

But determining ownership is not easy. Registration ordinances recently have recently been passed in communities like Temecula, Calif.; Methuen, Mass.; and Lee’s Summit, Mo., to name a few.

Lee’s Summit estimates the number of vacant homes in the community of 93,000 people has swelled to 300, but with the registry it hopes to determine a real number. “The biggest problem is you don’t know who to call,” said Mark Dunning, the city’s director of code administration. “You can make about 10 phone calls and not get anywhere.”

Real estate agents who work with banks to try to sell foreclosed properties worry that they will become targets of government regulations. For instance, Atlanta city inspectors, weary of the condition of foreclosed homes, have begun ticketing listing agents for code violations.

Registration enforcement has been slow around the country. In the first two months after registration rules went into effect this spring in Lake Elsinore, Calif., fewer than 60 of the estimated 1,000 foreclosed properties had been registered.

Mortgage bankers and firms hired to maintain vacant homes also are frustrated by the disparity in rules. For the past three months, Safeguard Properties, a large field services firm that works extensively in Chicago, has conducted weekly teleconferences with 70 to 80 mortgage servicing companies to update them on new laws.

“Every single day we get reports from different localities,” said Robert Klein, chief executive of Brooklyn Heights, Ohio-based Safeguard. “I’ve got ordinances from localities that I can’t even pronounce their names. There’s no way in the world that this industry can physically deal with 5,000 different ordinances, and each of them has their different caveats in them.”

Wall Street Journal “Vacant-Property Fees Add to Mortgage Firms’ Woes”

Robert Klein was quoted in a Wall Street Journal article regarding vacant property fees imposed by local governments.

Vacant-Property Fees Add to Mortgage Firms’ Woes

By RUTH SIMON

As home foreclosures continue to rise, a growing number of local governments are imposing stiff fees on mortgage companies responsible for the vacant properties.

Local officials say the levies are intended to offset the cost of maintaining and policing abandoned homes and to keep these properties from becoming blights on neighborhoods. The tougher rules also are adding to the financial burden on mortgage companies grappling with a surge in foreclosures, which some economists estimate may reach three million by the end of this year. And the new rules may raise costs and lower returns for investors who hold bonds backed by pools of mortgages.

“These ordinances are popping up every single day,” said Robert Klein, chief executive of Safeguard Properties in Brooklyn Heights, Ohio, which maintains vacant homes for mortgage companies nationwide. Mr. Klein said his office is tracking more than 60 local ordinances that deal with foreclosed properties. Local governments taking a tougher stand span the country, from Providence, R.I.; to Cincinnati, Ohio; to Chula Vista, Calif.

Keeping up with so many different regulations and changes is a challenge for the mortgage industry, said Chad Neel, president of FIS Field Services Inc., a Lender Processing Services Inc. unit that helps lenders manage defaults and foreclosures. In some cases, he added, “they force you to maintain the property at a standard that’s higher than the one for homeowners.”

The Mortgage Bankers Association says that mortgage companies are committed to maintaining vacant properties.

City officials complain that local taxpayers can’t continue to pick up the cost of cutting lawns, draining swimming pools, boarding up windows and policing vacant properties. In October alone, Louisville, Ky., spent $106,000 maintaining properties owned by major lenders, said Mayor Jerry Abramson, who has been talking to banks about reimbursement for property maintenance. “The cities are shouldered with the financial cost when they receive a complaint from a neighbor,” Mr. Abramson said.

Some municipalities are responding to the challenge by doubling or tripling existing fees and stepping up enforcement of existing ordinances, while others are adding fees and penalties. Registration fees on vacant or foreclosed properties can range from $35 to $500, said Diane Pendley, a managing director at ratings firm Fitch Inc., with annual fees sometimes topping $700 and penalties as high as $1,000 a day.

In June, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that lets local governments in the state impose a $1,000-a-day fine on financial institutions that fail to maintain vacant properties if problems aren’t fixed within 14 days. The new law allows cities “to go in, abate the problem and tack [the cost] on to the tax bill” without having to enact a local ordinance, said California state Sen. Don Perata, the bill’s sponsor.

Chula Vista, Calif., went a step further last fall by requiring that mortgage companies register and take responsibility for vacant homes even if a property hasn’t yet been the subject of a foreclosure action. The program is designed to keep vacant homes from falling into “a black hole” between delinquency and foreclosure, said Chula Vista’s code-enforcement manager, Doug Leeper, who drafted the measure.

Under the program, property owners can face fines as high as $1,000 a day if a vacant home is improperly maintained; unpaid levies are tacked on to the lender’s property-tax bill. Chula Vista already has imposed $296,000 in fines and penalties, Mr. Leeper said. He said he has fielded inquiries about the program from about 250 communities in Arizona, California, Colorado Florida, Illinois, Missouri, Oregon and Tennessee.

Providence, R.I., recently enacted a “vacant property penalty” that lets the city impose a fine equal to 10% of assessed value if a vacant property remains unoccupied and becomes a blight on the neighborhood. “We have inspectors out there now inspecting every neighborhood in the city and identifying every property,” said Providence’s planning director, Thomas E. Deller, adding that his department already has inspected more than 950 vacant properties.

Other municipalities are beefing up existing statutes. While Cincinnati has had a vacant-property ordinance for more than a decade, in 2006 it increased the application fees for vacant properties to as much as $3,500 a year after five years from a flat $300. This year, the city began obtaining civil judgments against property owners who don’t pay their fees. It also is putting together a program that will let the city repair, demolish or barricade abandoned homes and then, to recover the cost, put a tax lien on the property. City officials say they have collected about $192,000 in fees so far this year compared with roughly $265,000 in all of 2007.

Many of the vacant properties “are owned by lenders, and we are having a difficult time of getting them to step up to the plate,” said Edward Cunningham, Cincinnati’s division manager for property maintenance and code enforcement, adding that the money collected by the city goes into a fund used to deal with vacant buildings.

The registration programs are also designed to make it easier for cities to determine whom they should contact if the neighbors start to complain.

“The idea is to get some responsibility so these buildings don’t sit there and have a negative impact on the community while people argue about who is responsible,” said William Good, commissioner of inspectional services for Boston, which recently began requiring that properties be registered with the city as soon as a foreclosure notice is issued. To increase accountability, Boston is requiring that owners of vacant properties hire a local property manager to be responsible for inspecting the property monthly and maintaining it.

Safeguard Launches Good Neighbor Door-Hanger Initiative

Safeguard’s “Good Neighbor” program was mentioned on MortgageOrb.com.

Safeguard Properties, a Cleveland-based field services company, has introduced an initiative designed to reduce the risk of criminal activity at properties left vacant due to foreclosure. The company proposes that a door hanger be left at properties adjacent to a vacant and secured property. The door hanger will provide an 800 number that will enable neighbors to contact Safeguard 24/7 if they see any questionable activity or maintenance issue that needs to be addressed.

Servicers and local governments are partners in fighting blight, maintaining safe neighborhoods and ensuring properties are maintained, says Safeguard, but the correlation between vacant properties and criminal activity is well documented in communities nationwide.

As foreclosures and vacancies mount, the company has seen a material increase in the number of copper-pipe thefts, arsons and related crimes at these vacant properties. This ripple effect drastically reduces the servicer?s collateral in its assets and wreaks havoc on the communities where the properties exist.

This door-hanger approach has received enthusiastic endorsement from code enforcement and city officials, Safeguard adds. The first draft of the proposed Good Neighbor door hanger is available at https://safeguardproperties.com/pub/pdf/P&P_door_hanger.pdf

Robert Klein Nominated for SmartBusiness Entrepreneur of the Year

Robert Klein has been nominated for 2008?Entrepreneur of the Year by SmartBusiness magazine. The online article featuring Robert’s profile can be viewed here.

Service excellence

How strong customer service standards have allowed Robert Klein to grow Safeguard Properties

Smart Business Akron/Canton | July 2008

Robert Klein founded Safeguard Properties in 1990, and his motto has always been that customer service equals resolution.

In his early years, one of his properties suffered $18,000 in plumbing damages because of a mistake made by one of the company?s contractors.

?We have a problem,? the client?s CEO said in a phone call to Klein. ?We don?t have a problem,? Klein replied. ?I have a problem. You hired me to do the job right, and it wasn?t.?

Despite the fact the mistake was made by another party and that an $18,000 repair was a huge burden for a young company, Klein fixed the problem. Because of his willingness to accept full responsibility, that same client gave Safeguard its first $1 million contract within a month of that call.

As his business continued to grow, Klein?s strategy was always to listen to what clients wanted and needed, and to forge close relationships with clients at the ground level as well as at the executive level. Doing so has allowed him to address property issues in the field while focusing on cost efficiency and performance guarantees at the executive level. This has garnered him a reputation of being an innovative CEO, and he continues to look for creative solutions and relevant information for all of his clients.

As the mortgage industry has changed dramatically, so has Safeguard. Because of new trends, the company has evolved from a regional business model to a national one. With that change comes risks, but Klein remains focused on responsibility to clients and has invested heavily in technology to give clients 24-7 access to property information.

Eighteen years after the company?s founding, Klein, despite not having any background in the industry when he started the business, has grown Safeguard to become the largest private mortgage field services company in the nation, responsible for nearly 700,000 work orders each month on defaulted and foreclosed properties.

Cuyahoga County Proposes Land Bank Program To Tackle Rising Number of Abandoned Properties

Safeguard Properties was mentioned in an article from DSnews.com which can be viewed here.

Cuyahoga County Proposes Land Bank Program To Tackle Rising Number of Abandoned Properties?

Carrie Bay | 07.16.08

Treasurer Jim Rokakis of Cuyahoga County, Ohio has developed a long-term redevelopment strategy to address the county’s growing number of abandoned properties. If approved by the state legislature, this initiative will enable the institution of Community Improvement Corporations with decentralized county governance, and it will allow counties to design individual plans that are tailored to meet the needs of their communities.

Land reclamation of vacant and abandoned properties has long posed a problem in urban areas, and the burgeoning foreclosure crisis has only amplified the problem. According to Cleveland-based Safeguard Properties, the city of Cleveland, within Cuyahoga County, will likely spend about $9,000,000 demolishing condemned properties and another $4,000,000 on the upkeep of vacant lots this year alone. Both costs are regressive expenses, meaning that demolished properties will then become additional vacant lots, all of which will require upkeep and maintenance year after year.

Under Rokakis’ plan for Cuyahoga County, a county-sponsored ?land bank? will actively address the abandoned properties problem by opening up much needed resources. Modeled on the success of the Genesee County, Michigan Land Bank, the proposed Cuyahoga land bank will have the power to acquire abandoned properties from banks, receive tax-foreclosed properties, maintain properties pending rehabilitation, prepare land for development, and demolish those properties with no residual equity. The land bank will have the authority to buy, sell and hold properties throughout Cuyahoga County.

Rokakis asserts that the land bank must be self-sufficient since other government funding cannot be assured. According to Safeguard, he has outlined three essential sources of funding for the Cuyahoga County land bank:

-Tax anticipation: The treasurer proposes to pay outstanding real estate taxes by borrowing the money from its daily balance, and allowing the land bank instead of the individual taxing districts to recapture the statutory 10 percent penalty and interest on delinquincies.

-Tax collection cost fund: A change in the Ohio Revised Code regarding treasurers’ fees on delinquent taxes would allow an additional 5 percent to be collected and slated for counties’ land banks.

-Bundling: Pending changes to the Ohio Revised Code, tax foreclosed properties will be auctioned in ?bundles?, to prevent speculators from picking up only higher equity properties and leaving behind the negative equity properties to escheat to the state. These bundles will then be used to help fund land bank operations.

Safeguard says Rokakis’ proposal is expected to make a noticeable dent in the number of structures needing demolition in Cuyahoga, minimize the immediate negative impact they have on the community, and hinder proliferating speculation and flipping of these properties.

Vacant Property Ordinances: Finding Common Ground on a National Scale

Published in Managing REO June 11, 2008

By Robert Klein

In addressing issues related to vacant property ordinances, mortgage servicers and municipalities have the same goal – compliance.

Municipalities want the parties responsible for vacant properties to take care of them so they don’t contribute to neighborhood blight – and mortgage servicers want the properties they are responsible for to comply with city ordinances.

As many in the industry have noted in the pages of this publication and in numerous industry forums, the challenge is finding ways to comply with rules that are often disparate, unwieldy, and in conflict with other laws, ordinances and guidelines.

Some have suggested that the solution is for servicers individually to reach out to municipalities one by one to discuss the challenges servicers face in complying with each community’s ordinances.

Reaching out and opening channels of communications between municipalities and servicers is always important to build and maintain strong relationships between our industry and the communities. However, the issue of vacant property ordinances requires that the servicing industry first work collectively to develop a unified voice and common platform so we can speak as one to address issues with municipal leaders on a national scale.

Without that unified voice, our outreach efforts will be as disparate and unwieldy as the vacant property ordinances that challenge us today.

This is why mortgage servicers and field servicers, under the umbrella of the Mortgage Bankers Association, have convened a Vacant Property Registration working group which has held a series of industry calls to unify our message and open dialogue with cities on a national scale.

It is important to keep in mind that municipalities are free to enact whatever ordinances they choose to protect their communities from the blight, crime and safety issues associated with vacant and abandoned properties.

As an industry, it is our job to demonstrate to communities that it is in their best interest to work collaboratively with the mortgage servicers and the field servicing industry. Municipalities have to see us as credible partners who can help them develop ordinances that are workable from our industry perspective, and that provide cities with the legal recourse they need when property owners and others fail in their responsibility to maintain properties to community standards.

As a first step, a listing of vacant property ordinances was compiled, including the location, date of enactment, a link to the full ordinance, and a summary of key issues around the ordinance. This list is available to the industry at https://safeguardproperties.com/pub/vacant_registration.pdf.
As new ordinances are identified and evaluated, the list will be updated. The purpose in evaluating these ordinances is to identify best practices, as well as those provisions that will be difficult or impossible to comply with for legal, safety, cost, logistical or other reasons. With this information, the MBA-led working group is developing best-practice recommendations for municipalities to consider as they create ordinances for their own communities.

The plan is to make these recommendations widely available through as many national forums as possible where city officials gather. The group also is identifying key cities where ordinances are under consideration and organizing a proactive outreach strategy to offer our help to create effective vacant property ordinances.

In this effort, it is essential that city officials realize that our opposition to provisions in their ordinances is not self-serving. In fact, we have learned that cities often are not aware of the potential implications, legal conflicts, or negative consequences that could result when they enacted certain ordinances and provisions. By helping them understand the challenges and practical realities of servicing vacant and abandoned properties, based on what we experience in the field, we can reinforce to municipalities that we share a common interest in preserving and maintaining these properties.

Among the issues that the working group will propose to municipalities will be:

  • Standardizing definitions of pre-sale, vacant but not abandoned, and vacant and abandoned properties.
  • Recommendations for registering properties known to be vacant and abandoned.
  • Notifications to servicers of demolition orders and other legal actions based on those registrations.
  • Practices around securing properties and addressing hazardous conditions in both pre-sale and post-sale.
  • Recommendations regarding post-sale obligations, including compliance standards, registration fees, for-sale listings and interior inspection standards.

By engaging in dialogue in a consistent and unified manner, the group’s hope is that municipalities will view servicers as partners when they create vacant property ordinances. As an industry, we can help cities identify more effective and creative strategies to assure that properties are inspected, maintained and secured, without causing secondary problems that some ordinances have the potential to create.

We also demonstrate our commitment and credibility as responsible partners by sharing information about initiatives we’ve already taken as an industry to respond quickly to code violations. Many cities still are not aware that contact information for all major mortgage servicers is posted on the Mortgage Bankers Association website (www.mbaa.org) in the Property Preservation Resource Center. This information is available to every code enforcer in the country, and has been invaluable in reducing the number of code violations and lag time in addressing them.

The more professional, proactive and unified we are as an industry, the better our opportunities will be to participate in the decision-making process with municipalities throughout the country as they make decisions that affect our industry.

Tampa Tribune “The Rubble Of Foreclosures Is Business For Some “

The Tampa Tribune recently printed an article in which Robert Klein was quoted. The article can be viewed online here.

The Rubble Of Foreclosures Is Business For Some

By JEROME R. STOCKFISCH
The Tampa Tribune
Published: June 30, 2008

ST. PETERSBURG – Chad Berry has plenty to be distressed about as he and his crew clear out the remains of one family’s life in the once-stately Bay Vista home.

There is the matter of how to remove several heavy, armoire-size steel safes the evicted family left behind. There are the nine vintage arcade games, including Ms. Pac-Man and Asteroids, posing a cumbersome and heavy load.

But it isn’t the back-breaking volume of abandoned furniture that is troubling Berry on a recent weekday morning. It isn’t the stench from the food that had been removed from the refrigerator and left to rot in the kitchen sink, accompanied by buzzing flies and a mouse carcass. It isn’t the dog feces dotting the floors.

It is up the grand staircase in a small bedroom where Berry, a father of two young girls, appears out of sorts.

“That’s the only thing that ever bothers me,” says the owner of Gulf Coast Grounds Maintenance. “You see a little girl’s stuff. You know how much care and joy went into that bookshelf, into making that little manger scene. You know how they rearrange it. It gets to you, man. It bugs you.

“See that bookcase?” he says, gesturing to shelves lined with the toys, books and knickknacks that a young girl was forced to abandon. “It’s just, … I don’t like that.”

Painful Process

Berry holds one of several critical roles in the process of taking possession of and reselling homes lost because the owner couldn’t meet the monthly mortgage payment.

Florida is second in the nation in foreclosure filings. It can be a grim job to turn those suddenly vacant houses around and restore the housing market to some sense of equilibrium. But there can be no denying that the misery of foreclosure has also provided opportunity.

From lenders to field service companies to real estate agents to sheriff’s deputies who make it happen, there is acknowledgment that the foreclosure process is unfortunate yet necessary. There is unanimous consent: Nobody wants to foreclose on a home and evict the homeowner.

“It’s the last thing you want to do,” says Ron Tremblay, a senior vice president for Wachovia responsible for the bank’s repossessed real estate portfolio. “It’s the last piece of a very painful process. It’s painful for the property owner, painful for the bank, painful for the neighbors, for the community, for all of that. My role, as I view it, is to put the money back into circulation as quickly and efficiently as I can for the bank, and do it in a conscientious manner.”

Tremblay runs a Wachovia division fairly rare in the banking industry, an in-house program to rehabilitate and re-list homes to sell them to an owner-occupier. Most lenders outsource the chore.

When a bank takes possession of a home, it becomes “real estate owned,” or REO. In the past, those homes were typically marketed to handymen or investors who could pick them up inexpensively and turn sweat equity into rental income or maybe even a lucrative sale. The goal for lenders was to quickly get the real estate off their books.

But the process is changing as the housing crisis and the foreclosure spike spread beyond the low-income arena.

Subprime loans, mortgages with tricky terms, no-money-down packages, and more traditional factors such as rising unemployment have victimized people across the economic spectrum.

Returning homes to mint condition and targeting an audience of family owners and occupiers is a trend that has developed in recent years, says Robert Klein, chief executive of Safeguard Properties, the nation’s largest mortgage field services company.

“You used to put signs out that would say ‘REO Foreclosure,’ hinting, ‘Hey, come on in and get a bargain on me,'” Klein says. “We’re now well aware that the answer is not simply to sell to a flipper. You sell to a flipper right now, and in three years it’s right back where it was.”

The Bad With The Good

This month in Apollo Beach, Wachovia staffers Drew Niswonger and Scott Daal begin a tour of their bank’s REO properties in the Tampa Bay area with a stop at a $600,000 home in the Andalucia subdivision.

Niswonger and Daal are supervising Wachovia’s strategy of improving the foreclosed homes to what Tremblay called above-average condition – “so that when you walk into it, it doesn’t look or feel like an REO.”

It’s a hands-on approach. Daal, vice president and regional team leader for Wachovia’s REO division, traveled to the Bay area from Morristown, N.J. Niswonger, sales manager for the region, crossed the state from Daytona Beach.

“You can’t do this from behind a desk,” Daal says.

A lender looking to bring a house back to ship-shape might spend $5,000; if major appliances are involved, the tab can rise to $10,000.

The pair conclude that the Andalucia home is coming along nicely. It is being painted in colors specified by Wachovia. New stainless steel appliances have been installed, with new carpeting on the way. Utilities are on, and the air conditioning is running.

“This one’ll go quick,” Niswonger says.

Their next stop is a $295,000 home in the Rosedale subdivision in Bradenton. Contractors scurry about the home, where one of the residents has left behind an affirmation scrawled in green crayon on the white living-room wall: “Giggles ‘n’ Squirmy,” it reads, surrounded by an orange heart.

The Wachovia staff take note of a missing exterior light fixture. Daal halts a painter who isn’t using the specified color for an interior wall.

“This one will clean up well,” Daal says. “We want to show it like it was a new house.”

That would not be the case in the Bond neighborhood of St. Petersburg, where the two pay a visit to a home to which Wachovia recently took title.

“What’s the adage?” Daal wonders aloud. “One man’s junk is another man’s treasure?”

The house, which may have been a three-unit rental – or may have been converted illegally from single-family home to rental units – is littered with debris and the evicted tenants’ former belongings.

With the utilities long since cut off, the thick odors of cigarette smoke and an unflushed toilet hang in stagnant air. A television and various stereo components have been left behind, along with furniture, dirty dishes and food. Mattresses are scattered throughout the units, and there is evidence of rodents.

“This is a tough one,” Daal acknowledges after touring the property. “I think we have a lot more to learn before we make a decision on where we’re going to go with it, who our buyer is, what its value is. The more I look at it, the tougher it looks.”

Indeed, the Wachovia staffers later determine it would take too much work to bring the St. Petersburg dwelling up to the bank’s standards to resell it to an owner-occupying family. It will be cleaned up and sold as-is to an investor.

But there is better news at the higher-end properties. Within three weeks, the Bradenton house is sold, and an offer on the Apollo Beach house is being entertained.

Where Business Is Booming

The region’s real estate market has been among the hardest-hit in the nation. The Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater area had 4,773 foreclosure filings in May alone, or one in every 271 households. That was up 15 percent from April and 29 percent from the same month last year.

Nationally, the foreclosure rate is one in 483 households.

Along with the construction of homes, the foreclosure spike is contributing to a housing glut that has depressed prices. The median sales price in the area was $176,100 in May, down 16 percent from $209,300 a year earlier.

The Greater Tampa Association of Realtors says there is a 15-month inventory of homes on the market in this area, compared with one to two months in 2004-05.

One key to a housing turnaround would involve removing a big chunk of the 19,800 listings on the local market.

Economists report that new housing starts are down, which can bring alarming headlines but is good news for the bloated Bay area market. A reduction in the number of foreclosed homes on the market would also provide a shot in the arm.

That’s where companies such as Safeguard come in. The company, based near Cleveland, expects to serve 660,000 maintenance contracts nationwide this year, up from 173,000 five years ago.

The local market for Berry’s services is also red-hot. “Business is incredible,” said the head of the St. Petersburg maintenance firm. “I’ve been in it since 1989, and I’ve never seen a market like this.”

Like Safeguard and the other big national mortgage service companies, Berry performs most of the duties a lender requires to get a house in shape to be resold. He will make house visits or perform drive-by surveillance of homes in default, to report to the lender whether they are still occupied. He will enter an abandoned house and change locks. He does the “trash-outs” such as the project at the south St. Petersburg house. He has contracts for maintenance of 120 lawns of homes that have been foreclosed or are in pre-foreclosure. He has been on site with deputies during those ugly moments when families are forced to depart.

“There are some, when I walk in, the kids have done this before. You can just tell,” he says. “They know what’s going on, they know who you are, what you’re there for, they just gather up what’s important to them and take it. They’ll throw down a bedsheet, put the stuff in there, and you’re like, ‘That’s a kid. How does this kid know?’

“The kid has no emotion at all. They’re just kind of like, ‘Oh, that’s how people live.’ I’m like, ‘Oh, my gosh.’ That’s so nasty.”

But Berry is also aware of the magnitude of his role.

“If I wasn’t here … and nobody did this, the banks would become illiquid,” he said. “They wouldn’t be able to sell the property. They’d be gone.”

Treasures To Trash

As he is sifting through others’ misfortune, Berry says he often wonders about the circumstances. “There’s just no telling where they are, what happened to them,” he says at the south St. Petersburg home.

Sometimes, there are clues. On this day, he finds family portraits and snapshots that aren’t defaced or torn up, “so they’re not totally pissed at each other,” he concludes. He has seen otherwise.

The material scattered around the house doesn’t seem as if it should be destined for the trash pile.

A box of basketball and baseball trophies. Comic books, SpongeBob SquarePants toys and books. A large white envelope addressed to “Dad.” Ear buds, a Harry Potter collection, a math textbook.

A late-model pickup, destined to be impounded. An exercise bench. A wetsuit. Outside, in a pile of debris, a sonogram photo of an unborn baby.

Days later, the scene is repeated at a Town ‘N Country home recently vacated due to foreclosure. Mark Pace of Tampa Suncoast Realty has been contracted by the lender to turn it around.

As an REO specialist, the bulk of Pace’s work traditionally took place in low-income neighborhoods. But no more, he says. “High-end. Low-end. It’s a little bit of everything,” Pace says. “No neighborhoods are exempt from this.”

Hillsborough County sheriff’s Deputy G. Hammond knocks and gently pushes open the front door. “Sheriff’s office!” he shouts.

It is clear the home has been abandoned. The deputy returns to the front walkway after a brief tour to ensure no one is on the premises.

“Who wants to sign?” he asks.

Pace puts his signature on a sheet headed “Notice: Writ of Possession Executed,” and Hammond tapes it to the door next to an older posting, “Final Notice of Eviction/Execution.”

Pace and an assistant start hauling abandoned property to the curb.

And in an area with 15 months’ worth of homes on the market, another one is up for sale.

Reporter Jerome R. Stockfisch can be reached at (813) 259-8402 or jstockfisch@tampatrib.com.

?

Servicing Management “Increase REO Marketability While Controlling Repair Costs”

Robert Klein contributed an article to the June 2008 edition of Servicing Management magazine.

Increase REO Marketability While Controlling Repair Costs

Assuring that REO properties can compete with offerings in the traditional home market is key to successful asset disposition.

BY
ROBERT KLEIN

The increase in real estate owned (REO) properties on the market nationally, as well as the length of time these properties remain on the market, has been well documented.

The problem is expected to grow worse as adjustable-rate mortgage resets continue to hit the market. According to The Wall Street Journal, mortgage foreclosures are currently at l.39%, up from l.08% at the end of 2007 and 0.58% in 2006.

At the same time, the traditional real estate market has been hard-hit in virtually every corner of the country as sales decline, home values decrease and financial institutions tighten their loan standards. The Wall Street Journal also reported recently that existing home sales fell from an annual rate of 6.11 million in March 2007 to 4.93 million in March 2008 – a decrease of more than 19%.

It is believed that REO properties now account for 10% to 20% of existing homes on the market. That means that in a flooded housing market, REO properties face stiffer competition from the traditional home market than from other REO properties.

Gone are the days when REO properties can be sold as-is or placed on the market with basic trash-out and maintenance services. Today, REO sellers must compete with – and therefore think like – traditional homeowners when placing properties on the market.

Clearly, there is a difference in what a seller can realistically invest to maximize the return on a $400,000? property in California or Florida, versus a $100,000 property in the Midwest. Sellers with high-value properties in their portfolios are increasingly investing upwards of $10,000 to $20,000 to make interior and exterior improvements that have the greatest potential to yield better returns and shorten the time an REO property remains on the market.

Even with lower-value properties, REO sellers can maximize the return with minimal investment. The key is to make the property as appealing as possible to a home buyer looking for a home to live in and raise a family in.

When making property disposition decisions, REO sellers must balance three significant cost factors: market value, repairs and improvement expenses, and carrying costs while properties remain in the seller’s portfolio.

Historically, field servicers have focused primarily on property preservation, with a goal of protecting the asset from further physical decline by securing, maintaining and inspecting the property on a regular basis. However, in this highly competitive REO market, the field servicing industry must adapt its REO service offerings to effectively address all three cost factors relative to the property value and the return on investment the seller can realistically expect to achieve.

Market value

Many factors influence market value. Certainly, the glut in the housing market nationally affects property values as do economic conditions, shifting populations, the attractiveness of a neighborhood or community, and the age and condition of the property.

With REO properties, another factor that affects value is the REO taint. When prospective buyers see an obvious REO property, they often mentally discount the value of the property, expecting to encounter a desperate seller and desperate property.

A desperate-looking property is more likely to attract an investor looking for a deal, compared to a buyer in the market for a home to live in. Prospective home buyers are looking for a home they can imagine themselves living in, and feeding that imagination is essential to increasing the perceived value of a property.

REO sellers are beginning to recognize what viewers of the popular HGTV television programs are learning strategic improvements and maintenance can add significant value to REO properties by making the home appeal to the buyer’s emotions and senses. Even in a slow market, plenty of buyers are in the market for homes.

Curb appeal is important in any market, but in a competitive market in particular, it stops prospective buyers from fmding reasons to deduct value the minute they drive up to the property.

Real estate agents know that curb appeal is an essential first step in attracting a home buyer. No matter what a seller does on the inside of the property, if the outside doesn’t draw the buyer in, the emotional connection is lost. The effect is even worse ifthe other homes on the street have nicely maintained yards.

This is why REO sellers are beginning to move beyond minimal grass cuts and yard clean-up. With higher? value properties, sellers are increasingly authorizing exterior paintingand repairs, trimming of bushes and trees, mulching, weeding and other services to improve the curb appeal of the property.

But with lower-value properties as well, sellers need to maintain yards to the same standards as those of other homes in the neighborhood. These requirements mean weekly or bi-weekly grass cuts, weeding of planting beds, trimming of overgrown trees and shrubs, and removal of yard clutter.

Repair money

On the inside, even when REO properties can’t justify the expense to make improvements, their appeal and value can be greatly enhanced with regular maid service, yet too few REO sellers recognize the importance.

Maid services to remove cobwebs, replace burned-out light bulbs, wash windows, clean floors and carpets, wipe down counters and other surfaces, and make sure bathrooms and kitchens are clean and fresh can add thousands of dollars to the value of any property, at minimal cost.

For higher-value properties, thorough cleanillg and repairs, a fresh coat of paint, new carpet and flooring, and updated lighting and fixtures make an REO property more attractive to traditional home buyers intending to live in the home. Many buyers are willing to pay more money for a home that is move-in ready and that will not require them to invest more time and money after they move in.

Of course, because even basic remodeling and repairs cost money, REO portfolio managers must carefully consider these expenses when making REO disposition decisions. The difficulty in making the choices is that the bid process for an individual property can be cumbersome and time-consuming, especially when managers are responsible for large portfolios across the country.

In this area, field servicers can help by identifying creative and in?novative ways to streamline pricing and bidding processes so that portfolio managers can make the most efficient and effective decisions to maximize their return on investment.

One strategy is to offer a flat-fee pricing model For example, if REO managers work with a flat-fee pricing model and know that painting will cost $1.50 per square foot based on floor space, that carpet removal and installation will cost $12 per square yard, and that vinyl flooring will cost $15 per square yard, they have enough information to make more informed decisions about property disposition, weighing the opportunity for increased return on investment and a faster sale.

Partnerships

The ultimate goal of an REO manager is to move a property out of its portfolio as quickly as possible and at the highest return possible so the cash can be reinvested. The longer the property languishes, the more money is lost.

Therefore, to make REO properties as marketable as possible, it is essential that REO managers, their brokers and their field servicers work as a team. The broker’s role on the team should be to help the REO manager determine the potential market value of the home and the appropriate level of investment that will result in the most efficient sale. Investing too much may mean that the property is priced out of the market; investing too little may make the property less competitive with traditional homes.

The job of the field servicer is to assure that the property is in the best condition possible, appropriate to the market.

What does that mean? In addition to the initial repairs and maintenance, the property interior should receive maid-style refreshing service on a regular basis – floors swept, bathrooms cleaned, surfaces dusted and stale odors eliminated. After all, sellers with traditional homes on the market take these steps to make their properties more appealing.

Outside, the lawn should be cut as regularly as the lawns of other properties on the street, and it should receive the same attention to other landscaping details as well.

Additionally, it is important for the broker and the field servicer to work together on behalf of their mutual customer to quallty-check one another. If the field servicer is on?site and discovers, for example, that the real estate sign is missing from the front yard, a call to alert the broker is in order.

At the same time, if the real estate broker is showing the house and notices that something needs to be repaired, a call to the field servicer can assure that the issue is addressed as quickly as possible. In a competitive real estate market, REO properties can be as marketable as any traditional homes they compete with. What it takes is a spirit of cooperation, creative thinking and new approaches to add and retain value.

Safeguard Properties Honored for $150K Foreclosure Prevention Donation

DSnews.com?has printed an article about Safeguard Properties donating $150,000 to Cuyahoga County’s Foreclosure Prevention Program.

Safeguard Properties Honored for $150K Foreclosure Prevention Donation
by Nicole Barbosa | 06.13.08

Troubled borrowers have started to turn toward the unlikely. Not a traditional homeownership counselor or lender/servicing representative?but a vendor.

Though Ohio ranked only ninth nationwide with a foreclosure rate of one in every 410 homes, the Buckeye State posted 12,295 total foreclosure filings?placing fifth, according to the latest data released today by RealtyTrac. But these stats don’t keep companies, like Cleveland-based Safeguard Properties, from going out to their way to offer up advice and foreclosure prevention to homeowners in need of hope and answers.

Robert Klein, CEO and founder of the company, is receiving recognition and praise from colleagues for his dedication to this endeavor.

Klein and his company were recognized Friday morning by County Treasurer Jim Rokakis for the $150,000 dollar grant ($50,000 over three years) they provided to the Cuyahoga County Foreclosure Prevention Program.

?We are grateful for Safeguard’s commitment to the region and for their understanding of the critical role foreclosure prevention plays in protecting our neighborhoods and communities,? said Rokakis. ?This grant comes at an important time for all of us and will go along way towards helping to protect at-risk homeowners from foreclosure.?

The program, also known as the ‘Don’t Borrow Trouble’ campaign, attempts to provide the necessary tools (pamphlets, ads, etc.) to homeowners to prevent victimization by predacious lenders. Since it began in 2006, the program has assisted more than 10,000 homeowners and had a direct hand in the prevention of more than 2,100 foreclosures.

‘Cuyahoga County is our home, where we live and raise families. As a business, we see first-hand the devastation that results from foreclosures. It’s in all our interests to work together to prevent [them], and Safeguard is honored to participate in this initiative,’ Klein said.

For more information about the Cuyahoga County Foreclosure Prevention Program and the services they provide, click here.

Miami Herald “U.S. mayors seek solutions to vacant-homes crisis”

The Miami Herald recently printed?two articles regarding the U.S. Conference of Mayors held in Miami, Florida, both of which quoted Robert Klein.

U.S. mayors seek solutions to vacant-homes crisis

The lawns were growing wild. The trash was piling up. And the mayor of Louisville, Ky., was tired of getting stuck with the tab for cleaning up someone else’s property.

So, Jerry Abramson picked up the phone and called the senior vice president of Wells Fargo, one of the country’s largest mortgage lenders and owner of multiple, derelict foreclosures in his city.

”You owe me $27,000 for the month of October,” Abramson told the lending executive, “How do I collect?”

Underscoring one of the chief frustrations cities face in dealing with the nation’s foreclosure crisis — collecting on liens for code violations, Abramson kicked off a strategy session at the U.S. Conference of Mayors in Miami Sunday to tackle the growing problem of vacant and abandoned property.

As the nation’s cities tighten budgets amid a slowing economy, preventing vacant homes from falling into decay and dragging down property values is becoming increasingly difficult. At least 2.2 million homes are expected to fall into foreclosure by the time the mortgage crisis ends, according to a report prepared for the mayors by the market and economic research firm Global Insight.

Many will remain empty for months, if not years, while the housing market recovers, potentially becoming objects of blight and targets for vandalism and theft.

”There is a huge bubble just beyond the horizon and I am really scared,” said Bill Finch, mayor of Bridgeport, Conn. “I have two [foreclosures] on my block and I live in a nice neighborhood and there is grass growing high.”

Nationwide, some 44.5 million homes sit adjacent to subprime foreclosures alone, according to estimates from Enterprise Community Partners, a national nonprofit that assists cities in developing affordable housing programs. Each home stands to lose $5,000 in value as a result, said Ali Solis, an Enterprise director who spoke at the hour-long session.

Most city code enforcement directors don’t have the phone numbers of banking officials in their Rolodex as Abramson does, however. Hunting down executives so violations can be corrected quickly and at minimal expense is easier said than done.

”When you are dealing with international conglomerates, it can be very difficult to get to the individual who is responsible for the problem,” said Robert Klein, chief executive of Safeguard Properties, which contracts with lenders for property maintenance services. He said his organization had partnered with the Mortgage Bankers Association to provide a resource site where city leaders can easily find lender contacts.

When lenders fail to respond, however, cities must act before properties decay, leaving taxpayers with a bill that may never be paid.

”How do we work to get cities and taxpayers back the dollars they are due?” Abramson asked. No one appeared to have a direct answer.

But Jeffrey Starkey, code enforcement commissioner for the city of Wilmington, De., said his department had begun immediately ticketing property owners for violations, much the way cars are ticketed for parking violations. Most cities must follow a protracted code enforcement process that can allow weeks to pass before property owners begin accruing fines for violations.

On a separate front, cities face the challenge of recycling homes back into neighborhoods, either when they foreclose on liens or the homes become undesirable to buyers because they are in disrepair. Several South Florida municipalities are exploring options.

Miami Gardens’ city manager Danny Crew has said his city, for instance, was preparing to foreclose on a batch of vacant homes for unpaid liens in the coming months. One plan on the table is renovating them to offer as affordable housing.

Pembroke Pines Mayor Frank Ortis told mayors at a separate task force meeting Friday his Broward County community was exploring the possibility of assuming delinquent mortgages on homes currently occupied by renters as a way to prevent further foreclosures.

Their efforts could get a boost from Congress this week when the Senate takes up a housing stimulus bill that, along with making it easier for at-risk borrowers to refinance into government-backed loans, would also provide nearly $4 billion in neighborhood stabilization money that hard hit states could use to purchase and rehabilitate bank-owned property.

Florida would stand to get $288 million of that, under a funding formula included in the bill, or enough to restore 8,669 homes, according to the nonprofit Enterprise.

President Bush opposes the grant measure and has threatened a veto of the bill if it is included.

”Congress has not heard from enough mayors that this funding is critically important,” said Solis, who urged task force members to ”get on the horn” to their local representatives.

”In the next 18 months . . every single community will be directly impacted by foreclosure and see a significant decrease in property values,” Solis said.

??


Foreclosure crisis a concern for mayors

Facing constituents losing their homes and an eroding tax base needed to address the problem, America’s mayors assessed their role as first responders to the foreclosure plague sweeping through their communities.

”This entire crisis still continues,” Douglas Palmer, mayor of Trenton, N.J., said Friday in opening remarks to about 18 mayors and real estate industry leaders gathered in Miami for the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

The crisis’ potential impact was revealed in a new report revising the total property value lost from foreclosures to $1.46 trillion in 363 of the country’s largest cities by the end of the year, up from a November estimate of $1.2 trillion. The number of homes in foreclosure is also expected to rise 2.2 million, according to the study prepared for the conference by market and economic research group Global Insight.

PLUNGING VALUES

Home values in Miami-Dade and Broward counties could fall by an average of $47,571 per home, for a total decline in value of more than $60 million, the report said. David Iaia, a principal with Global Insight, told mayors the nation’s cities would remain on unstable ground until at least mid-2009 when the last major wave of adjustable-rate subprime loans should have reset.

Meanwhile, the mayors will be called on to help delinquent borrowers get foreclosure counseling, maintain vacant properties and use the bully pulpit to push for regulatory change in Congress.

Brian Montgomery, a housing commissioner for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, urged mayors to support the passage of legislation modernizing the Federal Housing Administration that would help expand affordable loans to new homeowners and help at-risk borrowers refinance. Other priorities were discussed, including finding additional funding sources for local counseling agencies and airing public service announcements about foreclosure alternatives.

VACANT HOMES

Central also to the 90-minute discussion were strategies for dealing with a growing number of vacant homes. Robert Klein, president and chief executive of Safeguard Properties, which manages real estate owned by lenders, said 22 percent of the 600,000 foreclosures his company inspected last month were unoccupied, placing them at risk of vandalism and other problems that could make them more difficult to sell.

They can also cause problem for cities concerned that blight will affect neighboring property values and drain municipal resources.

To address the problem in Florida, Lauderhill Mayor Richard Kaplan said he was drafting legislation to require lenders to register properties with the state. ”The biggest opponent to it is the lenders,” Kaplan said.

Earlier this month, Coral Springs became one of the first cities in South Florida to pass a law requiring registration of vacant foreclosures along with a fee, stiff fines, and an expedited code enforcement mechanism for dealing with derelict properties. Kaplan said a national registry was needed instead.

”Right now, each community is coming up with its own regulation and guidelines and there is no way a mortgage service company can deal with 500 different ordinances,” Klein said.

x

CEO

Alan Jaffa

Alan Jaffa is the Chief Executive Officer for Safeguard Properties, steering the company as the mortgage field services industry leader. He also serves on the board of advisors for SCG Partners, a middle-market private equity fund focused on diversifying and expanding Safeguard Properties’ business model into complimentary markets.

Alan joined Safeguard in 1995, learning the business from the ground up. He was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in 2002, and was named CEO in May 2010. His hands-on experience has given him unique insights as a leader to innovate, improve and strengthen Safeguard’s processes to assure that the company adheres to the highest standards of quality and customer service.

Under Alan’s leadership, Safeguard has grown significantly with strategies that have included new and expanded services, technology investments that deliver higher quality and greater efficiency to clients, and strategic acquisitions. He takes a team approach to process improvement, involving staff at all levels of the organization to address issues, brainstorm solutions, and identify new and better ways to serve clients.

In 2008, Alan was recognized by Crain’s Cleveland Business in its annual “40-Under-40” profile of young leaders. He also was named a NEO Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year® Award finalist in 2013.

x

Esq., General Counsel and EVP

Linda Erkkila

Linda Erkkila is the General Counsel and Executive Vice President for Safeguard Properties, with oversight of legal, human resources, training, and compliance. Linda’s broad scope of oversight covers regulatory issues that impact Safeguard’s operations, risk mitigation, strategic planning, human resources and training initiatives, compliance, insurance, litigation and claims management, and counsel related to mergers, acquisition and joint ventures.

Linda assures that Safeguard’s strategic initiatives align with its resources, leverage opportunities across the company, and contemplate compliance mandates. She has practiced law for 25 years and her experience, both as outside and in-house counsel, covers a wide range of corporate matters, including regulatory disclosure, corporate governance compliance, risk assessment, compensation and benefits, litigation management, and mergers and acquisitions.

Linda earned her JD at Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. She holds a degree in economics from Miami University and an MBA. Linda was previously named as both a “Woman of Influence” by HousingWire and as a “Leading Lady” by MReport.

x

COO

Michael Greenbaum

Michael Greenbaum is the Chief Operating Officer of Safeguard Properties, where he has played a pivotal role since joining the company in July 2010. Initially brought on as Vice President of REO, Mike’s exceptional leadership and strategic vision quickly propelled him to Vice President of Operations in 2013, and ultimately to COO in 2015. Over his 14-year tenure at Safeguard, Mike has been instrumental in driving change and fostering innovation within the Property Preservation sector, consistently delivering excellence and becoming a trusted partner to clients and investors.

A distinguished graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, Mike earned a degree in Quantitative Economics. Following his graduation, he served in the U.S. Army’s Ordnance Branch, where he specialized in supply chain management. Before his tenure at Safeguard, Mike honed his expertise by managing global supply chains for 13 years, leveraging his military and civilian experience to lead with precision and efficacy.

x

CFO

Joe Iafigliola

Joe Iafigliola is the Chief Financial Officer for Safeguard Properties. Joe is responsible for the Control, Quality Assurance, Business Development, Marketing, Accounting, and Information Security departments. At the core of his responsibilities is the drive to ensure that Safeguard’s focus remains rooted in Customer Service = Resolution. Through his executive leadership role, he actively supports SGPNOW.com, an on-demand service geared towards real estate and property management professionals as well as individual home owners in need of inspection and property preservation services. Joe is also an integral force behind Compliance Connections, a branch of Safeguard Properties that allows code enforcement professionals to report violations at properties that can then be addressed by the Safeguard vendor network. Compliance Connections also researches and shares vacant property ordinance information with Safeguard clients.

Joe has an MBA from The Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University, is a Certified Management Accountant (CMA), and holds a bachelor’s degree from The Ohio State University’s Honors Accounting program.

x

Business Development

Carrie Tackett

Business Development Safeguard Properties