Safeguard Acquires Bank of America’s Field Service Operations

Safeguard Properties reaches agreement to acquire field service operations of Bank of America

Safeguard Properties has reached an agreement to acquire the field service operations of Bank of America. Under the agreement, Safeguard will acquire the employees and vendor network of the field service operations working out of three facilities, and will assume responsibility to inspect and maintain Bank of America’s portfolio of defaulted and REO properties.  The transaction is expected to close in 60 to 90 days.

The acquisition of the entire field service operation assures that Safeguard will have the needed capacity to conduct business as usual and assure a smooth and orderly transition in the best interests of our clients, employees and vendors. 

“By building and expanding our resources, we are honored to have an even greater impact on protecting and preserving properties for the benefit of our mortgage servicing and investor clients, as well as neighborhoods and communities across the country,” said Alan Jaffa, Safeguard CEO.

Online articles can be found on the following sites: DSNews, National Mortgage News, HousingWire, and Crain’s Cleveland Business

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

Mortgage Banking Magazine Publishes Quality Assurance Article by Michael Greenbaum

A Measured Approach to REO Service Quality
By: Michael Greenbaum

In its U.S Foreclosure Market Report for May 2012, Irvine, California-based RealtyTrac Inc. reported that foreclosure filings increased 9 percent from the previous month. Overall foreclosure activity in May had exceeded 200,000 mortgages per month for the first time since the previous three months.

Even as the housing market shows signs that a modest recovery may be on the horizon, the fact remains that foreclosure activities are on the rise.

For mortgage servicers and investors, the ongoing threats are longer sales cycles, higher maintenance costs and lower returns on their real estate-owned (REO) property portfolios. For field service companies, the opportunity lies in delivering service quality improvements that reduce maintenance costs, shorten the sales cycle and result in higher REO sale prices.

New approaches lead to better results

Field service companies need to re-evaluate every step in their REO processes to ensure that REO properties are placed in the highest marketable condition and remain so throughout the sales cycle. A key component in the process must be a mechanism to routinely evaluate and improve the performance of contractors working in the field.  

Safeguard Properties’ REO department has developed a new quality-assurance process that has resulted in significant improvements in quality. The company’s REO department witnessed a 39 percent overall increase in properties with no deficiencies or quality issues since Safeguard started the program in November 2011.

The purpose of this new quality-assurance process is to provide Safeguard’s clients with REO properties that are in the best marketable condition and comparable to other properties in the neighborhood.

To accomplish this, a field service company, like Safeguard, needs to improve internal quality scores, external scores from clients and brokers, drive contractor behavior and, ultimately, increase overall client satisfaction. Field service companies need to raise their standards and deliver properties that are deficiency-free, hazard-free, have properly reported damages and are in clean, marketable condition.

The program begins after Safeguard’s contractors complete initial services. When the first contractor enters the property, he or she removes debris, remedies health hazards and completes a deep initial maid-service cleaning. The contractor will also inspect the property for any damages that may be present.

To read the article in its entirety, click here.

To view a related article, click here.

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

Michael Greenbaum Addresses REO Marketability in Mortgage Servicing News Blog

With the housing crisis lingering, real estate owned properties have faced unique challenges over the past several years. Mortgage servicers and investors have had to change the way they deal with their REO portfolios and pay more attention to the marketability of these properties that now compete side-by-side with traditionally marketed homes for sale.
 
To show its clients, or the mortgage servicers and investors, that the work its contractors perform is completed to the highest standards, Safeguard Properties created a new quality assurance program for its REO service line.
 
Key components of Safeguard’s quality assurance program include reviews of the interior and exterior work its contractors complete, collecting outside data, analyzing the results, and adjusting practices based on those results.
 
Interior and Exterior Reviews
Safeguard’s quality assurance program starts once its national network of contractors completes initial services. A team of inspectors is deployed to visit properties and assess the work completed. This process includes a 178-question script the inspectors must follow for both the interior and exterior of the properties. Photo documentation is required to illustrate what the inspectors find during this extensive review.
 
Collecting Outside Data
In addition to the information gathered by its inspectors, Safeguard uses data collected by outside sources, such as information from clients and brokers. This data, along with what has been gathered by Safeguard’s field quality-control department, in addition to data from clients’ third-party contracted group of inspectors, are compared with similar information gathered by Safeguard’s inspectors during the quality-assurance process.
 
Analyzing Results
Once all of the data are collected, Safeguard conducts a statistical analysis. The results are used to create “heat maps,” identifying with designated colors the areas or regions in which the contractors are meeting the requirements and standards. It also is used to determine the regions where the contractors are deficient. By identifying the weakest areas, Safeguard can take corrective action.
 
Adjusting Practices
When Safeguard’s quality-assurance team identifies contractors who are not compliant in specific categories, corrective measures are taken. The company may also choose to deploy its field team to visit “hot areas,” or those that are red on the heat map, and work with contractors individually based on their performance.
 
Any contractor who is deemed deficient in certain service areas also will receive additional training and specific goals for improvement. A four-week plan will be put into place that will incorporate multiple unoccupied property visits, contractor field training and office visits.
 
Quality Successes
Safeguard’s new quality assurance program has yielded good results. Since starting the program in November 2011, the company has experienced a 39% overall increase in properties with no deficiencies or quality issues.
 
Improvements in quality have also been reported by Safeguard’s clients. The company’s inspection scores from its clients have increased 17% since initiating this new quality-assurance program.

To view the article, please click here.

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

Kellie Chambers Addresses Interagency Guidelines in Mortgage Servicing News Blog

Recently, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., National Credit Union Administration, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued joint guidance on mortgage servicing practices that affect active duty members of the military.

While the guidance focuses mainly on mortgage loan practices and procedures for Permanent Change of Station orders that servicers must follow for active duty military personnel, field service companies can play an important role in keeping their mortgage servicing clients in compliance with this new guidance and consumer laws.

National field service companies employ a large network of contractors throughout the country who inspect and maintain vacant and foreclosed properties under the guidance of servicers and investors. They physically visit the properties and can be utilized for borrower outreach purposes.

The field service company’s contractors can make face-to-face contact with a borrower to help determine if he or she is actively serving in the military. The contractor also can leave educational materials at the door or in the form of a door hanger at the property informing homeowners of their rights if a member of the military on active duty resides at the property. These materials may include the mortgage servicers contact information and other valuable information.

Field service companies and their contractor networks can assist servicers and investors in addressing the new interagency guidelines in several ways:

  • Providing homeowners who notify servicers of PCS orders with accurate and understandable information about the availability of assistance for which they may qualify.
  • Helping servicers identify homeowners who are active duty military personnel and providing them with relevant information in compliance with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.
  • Providing accurate information about options to homeowners with PCS orders who are current on their loans and able to make the monthly payments
  • Delivering communications in a timely manner from the servicer to homeowners who are active duty members of the military with PCS orders.

To view the online article, please click here.

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

Freedom Alliance

Safeguard Properties and Freedom Alliance are working with banks and lending institutions to provide homes for military families without the burden of a mortgage.

Freedom Alliance will select qualified applicants to receive a home, while Safeguard coordinates with banks and lending institutions who wish to donate homes from their excess inventories.

The donated homes will go to Freedom Alliance, a charitable organization, as in-kind charitable contributions. Military families are matched with homes in their preferred geographic regions. 
 
Property preservationist Safeguard, along with vendors and community partners, will renovate the home and meet any handicapped accessible needs of the service member. After final due diligence procedures are completed, Freedom Alliance will gift the home to the military family.

“For military families, a permanent and paid-off residence provides stability and a place to call home for a family that has transferred from one duty station to the next over many years,” the companies said in a joint statement. “It is ‘a place of my own,’ for a service member who has traveled to remote areas of the world. It is a physical comfort for a retired warrior who previously slept in tents and foxholes.”

The program is open to troops who were wounded while deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom. To qualify, the service member must be medically discharged or honorably retired from the military. And if approved, the service member must use the home as a primary residence and may not, at time of application, have another mortgage obligation.

To read the online article, please click here.

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

Brandon Kirkham Discusses Managing Code Violations in Servicing Management Magazine

Expanded Services, Repairs Safeguard Servicers’ REO Portfolios
Alan Jaffa CEO, Safeguard Properties

Real-estate owned (REO) properties face more scrutiny from today’s savvy buyers. With the flood of foreclosures in the current market, mortgage servicers and investors struggle to compete with traditional-market homes. Every day a property is not rented or sold is money lost for servicers. Servicers and lien holders can protect and improve the quality and value of their REO portfolios through a variety of field service offerings. These include pre-sale repairs, REO marketability enhancements, major overhauls, and rental upkeep.

Pre-Sale Repairs
Because properties have different requirements pre-sale and post-sale, in the past, servicers established separate units to manage the specific processes for each. Now, they have begun to look at the process as a whole, working with their field service partners to make wise investments in pre-sale that protect the condition and value of properties in REO. In fact, the Federal Housing Administration
(FHA) now requires more repairs in pre-sale instead of waiting to address issues once the property goes through foreclosure sale, because it does not want damaged properties conveyed to REO.

REO Marketability Enhancements
Servicers are investing in additional services to enhance the marketability of their REO properties and engaging their field service partners to deliver higher levels of service. Neutral paints, new carpet, updated appliances and clean landscaping aren’t major repairs, but they go a long way to help REO properties appeal to prospective home buyers. Thorough cleaning and regular maid service, along with lawn maintenance keep the property in good condition and help buyers see a home’s potential.

Major Overhauls
When REO properties incur damages, the best way to protect against financial losses is to repair them. Damaged properties sell at far lower prices and sit on the market longer. When insurable damages occur, a field service partner’s hazard claims department can
manage the entire process. This includes filing the hazard claim, deploying reputable contractors to make the repairs once the claim is settled, and assuring that the work is performed to the servicer’s or lien holder’s quality standards. The goal is to turn a damaged property
into a gem so that the first impression of the property is positive and the property sells quickly and at the highest price possible.

Rental Upkeep
When properties don’t sell because of the slow real estate market, more servicers have begun to offer their REO properties as rentals. This requires initial repairs to put the property in good, livable condition, and ongoing services when maintenance issues arise. Field
service partners can be vital to the process, obtaining competitive bids, managing all repairs, and assuring that the work meets quality standards. Field servicers also can utilize their vast contractor networks, technology and infrastructure to manage maintenance needs for
an entire rental portfolio.

To view the article, please click here.

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

The Blight Fight

The Blight Fight

The quaint house on Idaho Avenue hadn’t changed much since Frances Espinoza last saw it.

The grass in the small front yard wasn’t quite overgrown, but still unkempt. A tan, out-of-place piece of siding patched the outside wall beneath the left-front window, and a cluster of roofing shingles did the same under another window on the right.

Cracks in the white paint revealed the ash-colored, wooden skeleton of the house.

“They haven’t really done anything to it,” Espinoza said. “You can see there’s a lot of problems.”
“They” meaning mortgage servicers.

The industry has long known of problems with vacancy and blight, even before the latest housing collapse. Behind-the-scenes responses — including code enforcement and neighborhood outreach — have met varying degrees of success. Yet the NFHA’s recent complaints bring new, unflattering attention to the issue.

Problems with vacant homes are epidemic in many cities’ minority neighborhoods, the NFHA said. After roughly nine months inspecting 1,000 homes, the NFHA said it found homes located in predominantly minority neighborhood weren’t in as good of shape or marketed as well as those in mostly white neighborhoods.

“It’s the same pattern,” NFHA CEO Shanna Smith said. “You find that they don’t put for sale signs up in communities of color. They’re not maintaining the lawn, cleaning the trash.”

But many within the mortgage and housing industry contest the NFHA’s findings, saying they make don’t make decisions of whether to clean up or repair a property based solely upon where it’s located.

The NFHA accused Wells Fargo and U.S. Bancorp, through Department of Housing and Urban Development complaints, of discriminatory practices in their maintenance of real estate owned properties — complaints of wrongdoing that both Wells and U.S.

Bancorp strongly deny. The NFHA said more complaints could come against other mortgage servicers and property managers, as part of an investigation funded by Fannie Mae and HUD grants.

The dilemma of managing vacant REO properties puzzles and presents problems for many, including the asset holders.

“The banks and servicers are looking for answers, too,” said Cary Sternberg, a senior vice president at Bank of America, though not speaking on behalf of the company. “But the answers have to be reasonable, and the answers have to make financial sense along with upholding their community responsibilities.”

THE INDUSTRY REACTS
For their part, the NFHA’s Smith said her group wanted to use this study and the HUD discrimination complaints, under the Fair Housing Act, as a way to get Wells Fargo and U.S. Bancorp to the table, regardless of whether the alleged discrimination is intentional. A complaint simply means HUD will investigate the dispute, and the two parties will sit down for talks to try and reconcile any allegations.
If that process fails, HUD may choose to file a lawsuit, or the NFHA could sue on its own.

“If somebody wants to fight, that’s fine,” Smith said. “That could take years to get a solution, and it’s just better for the neighborhood if we could get something done quickly.”

Spokespeople for Wells Fargo and U.S. Bancorp said the companies hadn’t yet received specific information on which of their properties were involved in the NFHA study.

“We don’t have a good sense of exactly what it is that we’re dealing with,” Wells Fargo spokesman Tom Goyda said. “It’s really impossible to respond specifically to this point.”

Both banks also point to their frequent status as a trustee on a loan that has been pooled and sold into a mortgage security. In these cases, the banks said the responsibility to maintain a foreclosed, vacant property would fall on someone else — typically the mortgage servicer responsible for managing the loan. But neither said race or location are taken into account when they make decisions regarding property maintenance.

The NFHA left open that possibility in its report.

“Wells Fargo conducts all lending and servicing activities in a fair and consistent manner, without regard to race,” Wells spokesman Goyda said.

Others in the industry responded similarly. Alan Jaffa, CEO of Safeguard Properties, said the property preservation company doesn’t discriminate in its practices. He said Safeguard wouldn’t work with a company that would attempt to instruct them to ignore or neglect certain neighborhoods.

Freddie Mac, meanwhile, said it doesn’t have preservation and marketing policies that apply to some neighborhoods and not others. “A lot of people always ask, ‘So how do you decide when to repair a home?'” said Eric Will, who directs REO sales for Freddie Mac’s HomeSteps program. “We don’t have any blanket policies that say, in this neighborhood, we don’t do repairs.”

DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS
Discrimination, on its surface, has a sharp social connotation. It suggests a conscious decision made to undercut someone based on their race, ethnicity or other characteristics.

“In my experience, it’s never blatant like that,” said Espinoza of the North Texas Fair Housing Center.

Legally speaking, “blatant” discrimination is characterized as so-called disparate treatment, wherein someone deliberately discriminates against another party. But in a disparate impact claim—such as that alleged by the NFHA—a plaintiff can claim discrimination even when there’s no intent to discriminate, according to Chris Willis, a lawyer with Ballard Spahr.

Willis, who represents lenders in consumer financial services cases, said policies can be race neutral on the surface, but can still have an unintentded, unequal impact on parts of the population. Apartment landlords made this argument recently in a lawsuit against the city of St. Paul, Minn., after ramped-up code enforcement regulations drove rents higher at affordable housing complexes.

The new regulations, landlords argued, crowded out low-income and minority tenants. The case made it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the city dropped its appeal because it feared a decision in its favor could undermine civil rights.

Ballard Spahr’s Willis called the NFHA’s REO claim novel, but thought it might make for a difficult fair housing argument.
“I would say that’s a little bit of a stretch,” Willis said.

Undaunted, the NFHA’s Smith said the maintenance of only certain properties does fall under the Fair Housing Act. Failing to maintain a vacant property not only impacts the value of the home next door, but could also endanger the tax base in the area, meaning schools and other property-tax-supported services could suffer, she said.

THE NFHA INVESTIGATION
The housing crisis has clearly taken its toll on the nation’s minority populations. In a study by the Center for Responsible Lending, researchers found that Latino and African-American borrowers are twice as likely to have lost their home to foreclosure than whites. And even among good-credit borrowers, blacks and Latinos were three times as likely to receive a subprime loan between 2004 and 2008.

Bank of America, acting on behalf of defunct lender Countrywide, paid $335 million late last year to settle a Justice Department lawsuit regarding discriminatory lending practices.

In nearly every city the NFHA looked at for its own vacant property maintenance study, it said African-American and Latino neighborhoods scored lower than white neighborhoods, findings that the NFHA said remained even among newer properties.

In Dallas, the house on Idaho Avenue, in a mostly African-American community, received a score of 75—deemed a “C” and slightly above the average 74.1 rating for all similar neighborhoods in the city. (Neighborhoods were rated on a 100-point scale.)

It’s unclear what exactly happened to the home and when it became vacant in a state largely known within the mortgage industry for its speedy foreclosure process. Dallas County records show that the deed on the house transferred from an individual owner to Bank of America Home Loans Servicing on May 17, 2010. The home came under the auspices of HUD on March 14, 2012, according to an agency spokesman.

Bonnie Jones, who has lived next door to the Idaho Avenue property since 1992, guessed the home had sat vacant since sometime in 2009. The last owner, the 81-year-old said, stripped the house of much of its valuables when he left, taking bathroom fixtures, the air conditioner and even the flowers outside.

The property had also deteriorated considerably since it became vacant. The lining on some windows had rotted beneath the black, iron bars that covered them. A pole in the middle of the front yard lacked the lamp that formerly sat atop it.

SENSITIVITIES EXPLAINED
Banks and mortgage servicers have more than just a civic duty to do right, said Sternberg, a long-time asset manager for mortgage servicers. They have to strike a balance between that and their responsibility to their stockholders and investors, inevitably concerned only about the corporate bottom line.

The NFHA has “one agenda, and that’s not to say the agenda is bad,” Sternberg said. “The issues that are involved are very sensitive.”
In certain situations, if an REO property is located in an area with a high vandalism risk, Sternberg said it might make more sense not to make a repair. That to him isn’t a case of disparate impact, but rather sound business logic.

“It doesn’t make sense to continually fix a window to have it broken [again],” Sternberg said.

Blight leads to further problems, and not just for the neighbors. Properties become a tougher sell and are harder to keep up to code according to Eric Miller, executive director of the National Association of Mortgage Field Services, an industry trade group.

Ultimately the neighborhood a property is located in comes along with any home purchase, Miller said. And with 18.5 million vacant homes nationwide, according to the Census Bureau, odds are pretty good that many neighborhoods across the U.S. have multiple vacant homes.

“If there are other properties that are blighted in that area … that investment could be potentially watered down,” Miller said. “There are certain areas you’re not going to prevent damage from occurring.”

That makes it increasingly important to maintain a relationship with a local city’s code enforcement team, said Rob Behrend, head of REO sales for Homeward Residential, formerly American Home Mortgage Servicing. The code officer’s uncertainty over the home’s actual servicer can delay needed repairs.

“That code violation could take a month before it gets to me,” Behrend said.

Often county or city records give the wrong contact information, a common complaint from code officials, according to Michael Halpern, director of community initiatives at Safeguard. Vendors, including Safeguard, offer access to a liaison system that facilitates contact between servicers and local municipalities.

The goal, Halpern said, is to maintain full transparency on both ends. He said Safeguard is even trying to reach out directly to elected officials.

But vandalism isn’t a just problem in blighted neighborhoods, Freddie Mac’s Eric Will said. He said in at least one suburb, people targeted the government-sponsored enterprise’s homes and stole heating and air-conditioning units.

In some communities, with consultation from brokers, Will said Freddie Mac will avoid posting signs on a vacant home in the hopes of deterring would-be burglars.

“You don’t have to be concerned about vandalism just in inner-city, urban neighborhoods,” Will said.

Low-value homes can also present an economic quandary, according to Sternberg. With the cost of repairs needed to bring an REO property up to a lendable standard, the margin might not be enough to outpace the lower sale price if sold as-is to an investor.

From an economic perspective, it can be hard to fault a lender for making a decision to leave a property as-is, said Brian Hurley, president at New Vista Asset Management. The company promotes homeownership for minorities, as well as households with low-to-moderate incomes.

Hurley said if no one makes an investment in blighted neighborhoods — which often have strong racial and ethnic correlations — the ruin doubles upon itself. Most people, he said, understand the long-term costs of this process.

“Someone has to be accountable to step up to the plate and say, ‘I’m going to stop the cycle,'” Hurley said. “I think institutions understand that there is a great desire on the part of America at large to see them do the right thing.”

FREDDIE SETS AN EXAMPLE
The National Fair Housing Alliance’s complaints of disparate impact hinge, in part, on whether it can demonstrate other practices can achieve the same business ends, Willis, the lawyer, said.

But many of the changes companies could make are already in place elsewhere, the NFHA said, often citing Freddie Mac as a good example in its investigation. The mortgage giant has developed a mutual relationship of sorts with the NFHA, trading information back and forth.

“We want our homes to look as good or better than other homes in the neighborhood,” Freddie Mac’s Will said. “Our goal is not to sell homes at deep discounts because that hurts communities.”

A number of measures, Will said, can help stave off REO blight. Freddie prefers to contract with local vendors in the community, he said, and give them authority to make emergency repairs — even without prior consent from Freddie Mac itself.

The GSE also wants its listing brokers to make a point of reaching out to neighbors, typically posting contact info in case of a problem with the property.

“I don’t think these things are necessarily rocket science,” Freddie Mac’s Will said. “It’s about effectively managing your portfolio of loans.”
Of course, Freddie’s biggest investors — the federal government and the American taxpayer — might have different priorities than those of large, public financial institutions. But Sternberg said no lender or servicer would ever tell a preservation vendor not to keep a house up to code.

“I just don’t believe that there’s any bank or servicer in the country that’s knowingly doing that,” Sternberg said. “They’re doing everything to be a good citizen with the constraints that they have.”

Pure, bottom-line economics don’t always translate to homeownership on the other end of an REO sale. Community advocates, like the NFHA, would prefer to see a home go to an owner-occupant, as ownership rates fall to pre-bubble lows.

The declining trend in homeownership has been especially tough for African-American and Latino households, according to Census Bureau data. While roughly 73.5% of white households owned a home in the first quarter of 2012, blacks and Latinos saw significantly lower shares of 43.1% and 46.3%, respectively.

Add that onto the adverse effect of the housing crisis and lost equity on minority populations’ wealth. Pew Research Center reported median wealth fell by more than half for African-American and Latino households from 2005 to 2009, but dropped by just 15% among whites.

Household wealth, particularly in middle-income, minority communities, is dominated by families’ investment in their homes, New Vista’s Hurley said.

The NFHA’s investigation frequently cited what it believes is a lessened effort to actively market REO properties in minority neighborhoods, making fewer homes available for possible owners.

“We don’t want to have our communities devastated by absentee landlords, absentee investors who are not taking care of the home,” NFHA’s Smith said.

Back in Dallas, however, luck changed for the home on Idaho Avenue. Shortly after HUD took it over, a for-sale sign appeared in the front yard.

“This is the first time anybody’s taken interest in it since it became vacant,” said Bonnie Jones, the next-door neighbor.

At an asking price of $20,000, Bonita Foucher, the listing agent, received a number of inquiries on the home. Within three weeks, she got a signed contract.

Foucher said she couldn’t say much about the buyer, other than that it’s an owner-occupant like most of the other homes up and down Idaho Avenue.

“We used to have all-time highs for homeownership for Latinos and African- Americans and whites,” Smith said. “If we’re going to start a recovery, we need to have properties in good shape.”

To view the online article, please click here.

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

State Laws Validate Field Service Companies’ Work

On June 20, mortgagservicingnews.com released a blog written by Robert Klein entitled State Laws Validate Field Service Companies’ Work.

State  Laws Validate Field Service Companies’ Work

Legislation has been introduced in two states emphasizing the mortgage servicer’s right to protect its collateral interest, further validating the property preservation work field service companies perform on behalf of their mortgage servicing clients. One of the bills also includes a provision to accelerate the foreclosure process for abandoned properties.
 
Louisiana Senate Bill 752 was just signed into law by Governor Bobby Jindal on June 8. The new law addresses the maintenance of abandoned mortgaged properties and explicitly protects the rights of mortgagees, loan servicers and third party property maintenance companies from liability.
 
The bill states, “the mortgagee, loan servicer, and any third parties hired by them to perform maintenance on the property…shall not be liable to the mortgagor or the owner of the seized property or any other person for any financial or pecuniary loss or damage claimed to have been suffered by the mortgagor or owner of the property or any person by reason of the maintenance of the property.”
 
Similar to Louisiana’s new law, Illinois Senate Bill 2534 has been created to protect mortgage servicers and field service companies from criminal trespass laws. This validates the agreement already outlined in documents mortgagors sign when securing a mortgage loan. But the Illinois legislation also includes an important provision to accelerate the foreclosure process for vacant and abandoned residential properties.
 
SB 2534 allows for the acceleration of the foreclosure process upon a court’s approval. It also clarifies the definition of a vacant or abandoned property. If that property is no longer occupied by a mortgagor or tenant and meets two of the following criteria, it is considered abandoned and is eligible for the accelerated program:

 

  • Building code violations
  • Unfinished construction
  • Disconnected utilities
  • Boarded or broken windows or door
  • Hazards like weeds or trash
  • Vandalism or illegal activity
  • Vacancy

 

Both bills validate the work field services companies do to maintain properties on behalf of their clients to maintain properties in their portfolios and reduce blight in communities across the country. As scrutiny has increased during the housing crisis, it has become more important to have such laws to support the work of field service companies and the rights of mortgage servicers to protect their collateral interests.

The accelerated foreclosure process for vacant and abandoned properties is another step in the direction of addressing the housing crisis. In some areas of the country, the foreclosure process can take more than two years. The longer abandoned properties sit vacant, the more susceptible they are to damage, vandalism and deterioration.
 
Under the new Illinois legislation, vacant and abandoned homes will move more quickly through the foreclosure process and into the hands of new owners who will protect and preserve the property’s condition and contribute to the vitality of the neighborhood. While other states are in the process of creating similar laws, more need to follow Illinois’ lead in helping the country move closer to protecting and restoring the housing market

To view the online blog, please click here.

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

George Mehok Quoted in Crain’s Cleveland Article

Companies’ mobile dos, don’ts lists growing

With more devices in the workplace, firms’ policies are more detailed

Three years ago, if a company had a policy regarding how its employees should use their mobile devices, it consisted of maybe a few pages, max.

Now some companies that work with mobile device management firm Vox Mobile Inc. of Independence have policies that are 10 or 12 pages long.
The influx of so many different high-powered mobile devices has made life more complex for the people charged with managing them, according to several information technology experts in Northeast Ohio.

Over the past two years, many local businesses that previously issued nothing but company-owned BlackBerrys have started letting employees use iPhones, iPads and Android phones, too.

Thus, they’ve got more devices to secure and support. And their employees have toys with all sorts of capabilities that can be abused and misused.

Making matters even more difficult, many businesses are starting to let employees use their own smart phones and tablet computers, as opposed to company-owned devices, to tap into corporate networks that often contain sensitive data. More than 70% of Vox Mobile’s clients do so already or are moving in that direction, said Jeff Fuggit, vice president of marketing for the company.

“This is a tidal wave,” he said of the “bring your own device” trend.

Erecting a “virtual barrier’
Companies aren’t about to stop using the latest consumer gadgets, given how popular and powerful they are. Instead, they’ve had to figure out how to mitigate the problems that come with them.

After years of using nothing but BlackBerrys, Safeguard Properties of Valley View started supporting other devices about a year ago and now is letting some employees access the corporate network with their own mobile devices, said George Mehok, chief information officer for the company. Safeguard inspects and maintains defaulted and foreclosed properties.

The company, which works with a lot of banks, had to be cautious about letting employees access sensitive data on devices they own, Mr. Mehok said. To protect that information, on each device Safeguard installs Good Technology-brand software that is designed to create a virtual barrier between corporate data and personal data.

“We have an obligation to protect our clients’ data. It would not be possible without something like Good Technology,” he said.

Good Technology Inc. of Sunnyvale, Calif., is one of several companies that sell software with the ability to segregate corporate data from personal on mobile devices, which makes it easier to secure sensitive information and erase it if a device is lost.

Those products are starting to become popular among larger companies, and for good reason, said Brian Stein, president and chief operating officer of mobile strategy firm Pervasive Path Consulting LLC of Solon. Companies trying to manage mobile devices with software that can’t make that distinction could run into problems if, say, an employee loses a smart phone only to find it later — after their employer has used the software to erase everything on it.

“If you wipe somebody’s pictures of their kids … they’re going to be pretty upset,” he said.

The root of the problem
Revol Wireless of Independence aims to start installing some kind of mobile device management software on the Android smart phones that some Revol employees now use, said Jim Bryson, manager of infrastructure for the wireless carrier.

The company also aims to create a mobile device policy, but it won’t do so until it starts installing the device management software, he said. Without the software, Revol has no way to enforce the policies Mr. Bryson wants to create, such as one that would prohibit employees from “rooting” their Android phones. That process lets users change the way the phones operate, which could pose security risks, he said. IPhones and iPads can be tampered with, too, through a process called jailbreaking.

Some mobile device management software can detect when a phone has been rooted or jailbroken, Mr. Bryson said.

“You’re essentially giving anyone … access to everything on the phone,” he said.

No such process exists for the BlackBerry, a device that made it “very easy to lock down devices and enforce policy,” he said.

Being able to remotely wipe data from employee iPhones, iPads and Androids minimizes the risk that someone might find sensitive data by rooting or jailbreaking a lost device, according to Karen Anzuini, chief information officer for Cleveland law firm Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP.

Thus, it is “very important for people to let us know immediately if someone loses the device,” Ms. Anzuini said.

Broadening the number of devices employees can use has created a few issues for Benesch, she said. For one, the number of calls to Benesch’s information technology help desk has gone up by roughly 10% to 15%, she estimated. Plus, the law firm’s network has been strained at times by the sheer number of devices trying to access the law firm’s email system at the same time, she said.

Benesch’s wireless network also does a lot of heavy lifting, which is why the law firm late last year installed a second network that employees at its Cleveland office can use for personal reasons.

“There are people who want to be able to stream Pandora (music service) or whatever at the office,” she said.

To download or not to download
Using a company device to stream Pandora or watch movies on Netflix after work is fine so long as employers aren’t stuck with data charges afterward, said Revol’s Mr. Bryson, who used to work for Vox Mobile and briefly worked for Good Technology.

“There’s got to be something in the policy to call that out,” he said.

Some company policies specify which applications employees can and cannot download, said Nate Kurash, account executive for Bennett Adelson, an IT services firm and mobile software developer in Independence.

Companies such as Verizon provide services that let businesses set up their own app stores, where they privately can give employees access to custom software and commercial apps they might need for work purposes, Mr. Kurash said.

Companies that let employees use Android phones also may want to regulate the number of models employees can support, according to both Mr. Kurash and Mr. Fuggit, of Vox Mobile.

For one, different phones use different versions of the Android operating system, making it hard to secure a fleet of different models, Mr. Fuggit said. Plus, companies using custom mobile software might find that their programs don’t work right when they introduce a different phone, Mr. Kurash said.

“If that’s the case, we may have to update our application,” he said.

To view the online article, please click here.

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

Safeguard Discusses How to Minimize Costs and Risks While Managing Code Violations

A November 2011 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) entitled “Vacant Properties: Growing Number Increases Communities’ Costs and Challenges” identified an estimated 10 million vacant properties across the country in April 2010, an increase of 3 million properties from the previous study in 2000. According to the GAO, 10 states have seen the number of vacant properties increase by 70% or more.

Based on this data, it is safe to assume that the number of vacant properties will not decrease anytime soon. Unattended vacant properties deteriorate and contribute to blight, which drives down real estate values and tax revenue. Keeping vacant properties safe, secure and maintained presents financial and administrative challenges for the mortgage industry and municipalities alike.

Even though the vast majority of vacant properties are on a schedule for regular inspections and maintenance, code violations occur: Vacant properties are broken into, inclement weather creates wind and storm damage, people dump trash and debris, a pool cover or fencing around the pool may be compromised, and so forth. All of these events can trigger code violations.

When the process works, city code enforcement officials issue a notice to the mortgage servicer when a violation is noted, and the problem is addressed quickly. When the process fails, however, properties deteriorate, and they impact the quality of life for surrounding neighbors.

Code enforcement officials become frustrated trying to get violations corrected, and servicers risk heavy fines, penalties and tarnished reputations for failing to correct problems in a timely manner. A number of municipalities have even issued criminal citations against the executives of entities holding title to troubled properties.

Local governments each have a wide array of building, housing and property maintenance codes that establish standards for the appearance and safety of properties within their communities. Cities with high volumes of vacant and foreclosed properties have become more aggressive with their housing inspections in response to safety and nuisance complaints from neighbors.

Many local governments also view code enforcement as an opportunity to generate revenues to relieve tightening budgets. As a result of stronger code enforcement actions, servicers face fines and penalties in the thousands of dollars for failure to correct violations that would have cost only hundreds to address initially.

In fact, conversations with code enforcement officials in cities across the country often reveal three violations as the most common, each of which is relatively easy and inexpensive to remedy: an unsecured property, tall grass, and debris in the yard. Most of the time, fines accumulate – not because the servicer knowingly ignored a citation, but because the servicer wasn’t aware of the violation and failed to address it in a timely way.

Consider this case about a property that incurred violations after it was found unsecured as a result of vandalism: The city issued violations for having an unsecured property, failing to maintain the property, having a dangerous structure, failing to inspect and lacking a permit. As it turned out, a master servicer was overseeing a second servicer that had day-to-day responsibility for the property. The municipality was unaware of the servicing arrangement and sent violation notices to the master servicer, which did not notify the city or forward the violations to the appropriate servicer.

When the violations went uncorrected, the city took enforcement action that ultimately resulted in nearly $12,000 in civil penalties, more than $1,000 in fees to cover direct expenses, and additional daily penalties that ranged between $150 and $375 per violation. Had the notice been addressed in a timely way, the servicer would have spent only a few hundred dollars to re-secure the property.

In addition to taking stricter enforcement action and levying stiffer fines and penalties, cities have widened the net of violations they cite. In the past, servicers received code notifications only for violations related to the safety and security pf the structure.

Recently, municipalities have begun issuing citations for dirty floors, carpets and windows, strong odors in the home, and other items the industry views as cosmetic. Because cosmetics are not included in preservation fee schedules and investor allowables for foreclosed properties, servicers may not be reimbursed for these services. Yet, they are responsible to the investor for correcting all code violations.

Similarly, servicers face greater risks, as municipalities have begun to issue violation notices on occupied foreclosed properties for problems ranging from missing smoke detectors and window locks to insufficient heat or hot water and broken sink stoppers. Despite the stronger position municipalities have taken to address code violations, it is important to recognize that municipalities and the mortgage industry are on the same side in the battle to protect property values and maintain the quality of life in neighborhoods. By working and communicating more effectively with code enforcement officials and taking steps to improve their systems and processes, servicers can minimize code violations and the associated fines, penalties and reputational risks.

Effective systems
Servicers cannot fix problems they don’t know about, and code enforcement departments don’t have the resources to search for the right person to notify within a large, multi-office mortgage servicing organization. Code violations can occur before the loan becomes delinquent. Therefore, servicers should identify a single point of contact within their organizations to respond to complaints regarding current loans or a field service provider who serves as their agent to address code violations after a loan becomes delinquent.

Contact names should be communicated throughout the organization and posted on the servicer’s website. Maintaining a single point of contact or intake method for the benefit of municipalities streamlines the notification process.

To manage the sheer volume of properties, servicers also should consider utilizing a code enforcement management system that allows municipalities to post violation notices and enables internal staff to receive, track and manage violations to a successful conclusion. The more efficient and direct the process is between municipalities and servicers to post, monitor and resolve violation notices, the more successful servicers will be in addressing code violations quickly. This is especially critical as code enforcement officials become either less willing or have less authority to negotiate reductions in fines and penalties.

When servicers incur penalties, effective dialogue with municipalities can help to stop the accrual of further penalties and even reduce them. A trained and empowered negotiator who understands local codes can develop case resolution plans that are acceptable to the
municipality and that can alter the timing and nature of enforcement actions by the municipality.

For example, communication with municipalities can help facilitate the extension of grace periods on violations in cases where a servicer or lien holder will soon take possession or control over a property. Upon initial vacancy, when properties have been in violation of certain codes, it is helpful for the servicer or its field service agent to communicate with code enforcement officials about the completion of standard initial services that would likely correct these conditions.

Furthermore, having knowledge of the code violation can improve the servicer’s ability to adjust the initial services work order to sufficiently address the violations. Whenever municipalities can be made to understand what services can or will be performed within certain time frames, they are more likely to suspend enforcement to provide a reasonable time to cure the violation.

Proper procedures
Loans serviced on behalf of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the government-sponsored enterprises, the Federal Housing Administration and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs have guidelines, fee schedules, delegated authority and other options to assist the servicer in protecting and preserving properties. These guidelines, however, do not include provisions to address all of the potential challenges that result in code violations.

Servicers are required to seek approval before certain expenditures can be made. The approval process includes maintaining documentation and obtaining bids and photos before work can be performed to cure the violation. To facilitate the decision-making process and cost reimbursement, servicers must maintain detailed records and supporting documentation. Failure to maintain documentation can result in non-reimbursement for fines, penalties and the costs of work performed. Having a single, concise location to manage violations and retain supporting documentation provides transparency and improves recovery.

Code enforcement departments and the mortgage industry share a common goal to protect the condition and value of vacant and abandoned properties. They also have their own unique challenges. The housing crisis has strained municipal budgets and put more pressure on code enforcement departments to address property complaints. Servicers struggle to maintain growing numbers of vacant properties while complying with myriad local codes and requirements, sometimes putting them in conflict with other laws. Through outreach and dialogue, both sides have begun to listen and share ideas and solutions.

The American Association of Code Enforcement and individual state code enforcement associations have been valuable partners with which to facilitate such dialogue. Representatives from the mortgage servicing industry have participated in educational sessions and roundtable discussions with state and local officials to share expectations and discuss solutions.

The GAO study on vacant properties pointed out the challenges that code enforcement departments and local municipal officials face in identifying a responsible party to maintain properties. Among them are owners who have left their homes, outdated and insufficient property records, and insufficient staffing to identify the right party.

The mortgage servicing industry has come a long way in developing the knowledge and tools to become true partners with municipalities and code enforcement officials across the country to effectively address code violations. And it is in the industry’s best interest to utilize such relationships.

To view the article, please click here.

About Safeguard
Safeguard Properties is the largest privately held field services company in the country. Located in Cleveland, Ohio and founded in 1990 by Robert Klein, Safeguard has grown from a regional preservation company with a few employees  and a handful of contractors performing services in the Midwest, to a national company with nearly 1,000 employees. Safeguard is supported by a nationwide network of subcontractors able to perform any requested superintendence, preservation, and maintenance functions, as well as numerous ancillary services in the U.S., the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.

x

CEO

Alan Jaffa

Alan Jaffa is the Chief Executive Officer for Safeguard Properties, steering the company as the mortgage field services industry leader. He also serves on the board of advisors for SCG Partners, a middle-market private equity fund focused on diversifying and expanding Safeguard Properties’ business model into complimentary markets.

Alan joined Safeguard in 1995, learning the business from the ground up. He was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in 2002, and was named CEO in May 2010. His hands-on experience has given him unique insights as a leader to innovate, improve and strengthen Safeguard’s processes to assure that the company adheres to the highest standards of quality and customer service.

Under Alan’s leadership, Safeguard has grown significantly with strategies that have included new and expanded services, technology investments that deliver higher quality and greater efficiency to clients, and strategic acquisitions. He takes a team approach to process improvement, involving staff at all levels of the organization to address issues, brainstorm solutions, and identify new and better ways to serve clients.

In 2008, Alan was recognized by Crain’s Cleveland Business in its annual “40-Under-40” profile of young leaders. He also was named a NEO Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year® Award finalist in 2013.

x

Esq., General Counsel and EVP

Linda Erkkila

Linda Erkkila is the General Counsel and Executive Vice President for Safeguard Properties, with oversight of legal, human resources, training, and compliance. Linda’s broad scope of oversight covers regulatory issues that impact Safeguard’s operations, risk mitigation, strategic planning, human resources and training initiatives, compliance, insurance, litigation and claims management, and counsel related to mergers, acquisition and joint ventures.

Linda assures that Safeguard’s strategic initiatives align with its resources, leverage opportunities across the company, and contemplate compliance mandates. She has practiced law for 25 years and her experience, both as outside and in-house counsel, covers a wide range of corporate matters, including regulatory disclosure, corporate governance compliance, risk assessment, compensation and benefits, litigation management, and mergers and acquisitions.

Linda earned her JD at Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. She holds a degree in economics from Miami University and an MBA. Linda was previously named as both a “Woman of Influence” by HousingWire and as a “Leading Lady” by MReport.

x

COO

Michael Greenbaum

Michael Greenbaum is the Chief Operating Officer of Safeguard Properties, where he has played a pivotal role since joining the company in July 2010. Initially brought on as Vice President of REO, Mike’s exceptional leadership and strategic vision quickly propelled him to Vice President of Operations in 2013, and ultimately to COO in 2015. Over his 14-year tenure at Safeguard, Mike has been instrumental in driving change and fostering innovation within the Property Preservation sector, consistently delivering excellence and becoming a trusted partner to clients and investors.

A distinguished graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, Mike earned a degree in Quantitative Economics. Following his graduation, he served in the U.S. Army’s Ordnance Branch, where he specialized in supply chain management. Before his tenure at Safeguard, Mike honed his expertise by managing global supply chains for 13 years, leveraging his military and civilian experience to lead with precision and efficacy.

x

CFO

Joe Iafigliola

Joe Iafigliola is the Chief Financial Officer for Safeguard Properties. Joe is responsible for the Control, Quality Assurance, Business Development, Marketing, Accounting, and Information Security departments. At the core of his responsibilities is the drive to ensure that Safeguard’s focus remains rooted in Customer Service = Resolution. Through his executive leadership role, he actively supports SGPNOW.com, an on-demand service geared towards real estate and property management professionals as well as individual home owners in need of inspection and property preservation services. Joe is also an integral force behind Compliance Connections, a branch of Safeguard Properties that allows code enforcement professionals to report violations at properties that can then be addressed by the Safeguard vendor network. Compliance Connections also researches and shares vacant property ordinance information with Safeguard clients.

Joe has an MBA from The Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University, is a Certified Management Accountant (CMA), and holds a bachelor’s degree from The Ohio State University’s Honors Accounting program.

x

Business Development

Carrie Tackett

Business Development Safeguard Properties