FEMA Declared Disaster Tennessee

FEMA Alert Update
May 8, 2020

FEMA issued an update to a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration for areas in Tennessee affected by severe storms, tornadoes, straight-line winds and flooding that took place April 12-13, 2020.

The following county is eligible for assistance:

Public Assistance

  • Unicoi

Tennessee Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-Line Winds and Flooding (DR-4541 Amendment 1)

FEMA Declared Disaster Tennessee: ZIP Code List

 

FEMA Alert
April 24, 2020

FEMA issued a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration for areas in Tennessee affected by severe storms, tornadoes, straight-line winds and flooding that took place April 12-13, 2020.

The following counties are eligible for assistance:

Individual Assistance

  • Bradley
  • Hamilton

Public Assistance

  • Bradley
  • Campbell
  • Hamilton
  • Marion
  • Monroe
  • Polk
  • Scott
  • Washington

Tennessee Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-Line Winds and Flooding (DR-4541)

FEMA Declared Disaster Tennessee: ZIP Code List

 

Additional Resources

FEMA’s web site

FEMA’s Disaster Declaration Process

Safeguard Properties Industry Alerts

HUD Moratorium on Foreclosure

VA’s Policy Regarding Natural Disasters

Freddie Mac Disaster Relief Policies

Fannie Mae’s Natural Disaster Relief Policies

FEMA Declared Disaster Mississippi

FEMA Alert Update
June 25, 2020

FEMA issued an update to a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration for areas in Mississippi affected by severe storms, flooding and mudslides that took place February 10-18, 2020.

The following counties are eligible for assistance:

Public Assistance

  • Issaquena
  • Marion
  • Sharkey

Mississippi Severe Storms, Flooding and Mudslides (DR-4538 Amendment 3)

FEMA Declared Disaster Mississippi: ZIP Code List

 

 

FEMA Alert Update
May 29, 2020

FEMA issued an update to a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration for areas in Mississippi affected by severe storms, flooding and mudslides that took place February 10-18, 2020.

The following county is eligible for assistance:

Public Assistance

  • Wilkinson

Mississippi Severe Storms, Flooding and Mudslides (DR-4538 Amendment 2)

FEMA Declared Disaster Mississippi: ZIP Code List

 

FEMA Alert
April 23, 2020

FEMA issued a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration for areas in Mississippi affected by severe storms, flooding and mudslides that took place February 10-18, 2020.

The following counties are eligible for assistance:

Public Assistance

  • Attala
  • Carroll
  • Claiborne
  • Clay
  • Copiah
  • Grenada
  • Hinds
  • Holmes
  • Leflore
  • Warren
  • Yazoo

Mississippi Severe Storms, Flooding and Mudslides (DR-4538)

FEMA Declared Disaster Mississippi: ZIP Code List

 

Additional Resources

FEMA’s web site

FEMA’s Disaster Declaration Process

Safeguard Properties Industry Alerts

HUD Moratorium on Foreclosure

VA’s Policy Regarding Natural Disasters

Freddie Mac Disaster Relief Policies

Fannie Mae’s Natural Disaster Relief Policies

FEMA Declared Disaster Washington

FEMA Alert
April 23, 2020

FEMA issued a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration for areas in Washington affected by severe storms, flooding, landslides and mudslides that took place January 20 to February 10, 2020.

The following counties are eligible for assistance:

Public Assistance

  • Columbia
  • Garfield
  • Grays Harbor
  • Island
  • King
  • Lewis
  • Mason
  • Pacific
  • San Juan
  • Skagit
  • Snohomish
  • Thurston
  • Wahkiakum
  • Walla Walla
  • Whatcom

Washington Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides and Mudslides (DR-4539)

FEMA Declared Disaster Washington: ZIP Code List

 

Additional Resources

FEMA’s web site

FEMA’s Disaster Declaration Process

Safeguard Properties Industry Alerts

HUD Moratorium on Foreclosure

VA’s Policy Regarding Natural Disasters

Freddie Mac Disaster Relief Policies

Fannie Mae’s Natural Disaster Relief Policies

FHFA: Reporting by Regulated Entities of Stress Testing Results as of December 31, 2019

Investor Update
April 27, 2020

Source: FHFA

Federal Register Citation: 85 FR 23219PDF Format

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) provides notice that it issued Orders, dated March 10, 2020, with respect to stress test reporting as of December 31, 2019, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), as amended by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA). Summary Instructions and Guidance accompanied the Orders to provide testing scenarios.

DATES: Each Order is applicable March 10, 2020.

FHFA: New COO Announced

Investor Update
April 27, 2020

Source: FHFA

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) today announced that Kate Fulton will join FHFA as Chief Operating Officer on May 26, 2020.

Fulton comes to FHFA from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) where she currently serves as COO under Director Kathy Kraninger. She brings extensive experience in federal agency operations, including personnel law, administrative operations, information technology, and financial management. Over her seven years at CFPB, she has held progressively more responsible management roles, from Senior Advisor in the Division of Supervision, Enforcement, and Fair Lending to Deputy Chief of Staff under Director Richard Cordray and Acting Director Mick Mulvaney.

Prior to joining the Bureau, Fulton worked at the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and at a law firm representing federal employees. Fulton holds a J.D. from Boston University School of Law and a B.A. in Communications from the University of Maryland, College Park. She lives in Rockville, Maryland, with her husband and two children.

FHFA’s acting Chief Operating Officer, Lawrence Stauffer, will help with the transition and continue to serve FHFA in his previous role as a Special Advisor in the Division of Resolutions.​

Contacts:
Media:  Raffi Williams Raffi.Williams@FHFA.gov

CFPB: Mortgage Loan Transfer Process to Prevent Consumer Harm

Industry Update
April 24, 2020

Source: CFPB

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today outlined practices to provide mortgage servicers clarity, facilitate compliance, and prevent harm to consumers during the transfer of residential mortgages.

A mortgage servicer typically collects and processes loan payments on behalf of the owner of the mortgage note, conducts escrow-related processes, and handles loss mitigation, as appropriate. Servicing transfers are common and may occur in several ways. The mortgage owner may sell the rights to service the loan, the owner of the loan may hire a vendor–typically called a sub-servicer to take on the servicing duties–or the entity that owns the loan may outright sell the mortgage loan as an asset.

As consumers do not have a choice with respect to the transfer of servicing, compliance with regulatory requirements is especially important in risk mitigation and preventing consumer harm.

Examples of practices that servicers may consider as contributing to compliance include:

• Developing a servicing transfer plan that includes a communications plan, testing plan (for system conversion), a timeline with key milestones and an escalation plan for potential problems;

• Engaging in quality control work after a transfer of preliminary data to validate that the data on the transferee’s system matches the data submitted by the transferor;

• Determining servicing responsibilities for legacy accounts including tax reporting, credit bureau reporting and other questions that may arise;

• Conducting a post-transfer review or de-brief to determine effectiveness of the transfer plan and whether any gaps have arisen that require resolution; and

• Monitoring consumer complaints and loss mitigation performance metrics. The CFPB emphasizes the importance of post-transfer monitoring to ensure that transferred data is complete, accurate and functional for the transferee.

• Identifying any loans in default, active foreclosure and bankruptcy or any forbearance agreements entered in with the borrower. Where applicable include loss mitigation activity for each loan, including status and notes pertaining to the loss mitigation action.

“Consumers should experience a seamless process when their mortgage servicer changes. The guidance we released today will facilitate a well-functioning mortgage servicer transfer process, providing a roadmap for servicers that will prevent consumer harm,” said CFPB Director Kathleen L. Kraninger. “The guidance provides insights the CFPB has gained through years of supervisory and enforcement work to oversee compliance with regulations updated after the financial crisis.”

Since 2014 when significant changes to Regulation X mortgage servicing rules took effect, the CFPB has found weakness in how some servicers manage mortgage transfers. When transferring a loan, servicers should have policies and procedures reasonably designed to transfer all of the information and documents in their possession or control relating to a transferred mortgage loan, such as, a unique identifier for each loan, the terms of the loan, current unpaid principal balance as of a specific date, information concerning any escrow, and copies of any loss mitigation applications submitted by a borrower and of any loss mitigation agreements agreed to with a borrower. Such actions can prevent consumer harm, for example, ensuring there is no lag in paying the borrower’s taxes and insurance from escrow accounts.

The CFPB began developing this guidance well before the coronavirus pandemic, in consultation with interagency and intergovernmental partners. Recognizing the particular challenges that entities may face as a result of the pandemic, if a servicing transfer is requested or required by a federal regulator or by the security issuer of “Government Loans,” the CFPB intends to consider such challenges, including operational and time constraints related to the transfer, and to be sensitive to good-faith efforts demonstrably designed to transfer the servicing without adverse impact to consumers. The CFPB intends to focus any supervisory feedback for institutions, if needed, on identifying issues, correcting deficiencies, and ensuring appropriate remediation for consumers.

Read the guidance 

VA: Circular 26-18-3: Acceptance of Properties

Updated 4/20/20: Extended rescission date of the original circular.

Circular 26-18-3 (Change 1)

Investor Update
February 23, 2018

Source: VA

1. Purpose. This Circular provides guidance on requests for execution of documents related to the conveyance or reconveyance of properties to the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to provide specific details to those authorized to sign documents for the Secretary, and to those who submit such documents.

2. Background. Conveyance of properties to the Secretary is addressed in Title 38, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 36.4323, titled “Election to Convey Security”. This section discusses the conditions in which a loan servicer that acquires a property which secured a VAguaranteed loan at a liquidation sale, via foreclosure or through acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of
foreclosure, may decide to transfer the property to the Secretary. The regulation provides that the conveyance is subject to a number of provisions, particularly that the servicer will convey the title to the Secretary via a special warranty deed and must provide evidence to the Secretary of acceptability of title (which need not be provided if transfer is via a general warranty deed). The fact that the VA Loan Electronic Reporting Interface (VALERI) accepts the Transfer of Custody (TOC) event to report the notice of election to convey, this does not mean the Secretary has actually accepted conveyance of the property until all provisions of 38 CFR 36.4323 are satisfied.

To access full circular, please click the source link above.

VA: Circular 26-18-5: Property Management and Servicing Contract

Updated 4/20/20: Extended rescission date of the original circular.

Circular 26-18-5 (Change 1)

Investor Update
February 27, 2018

Source: VA

1. Purpose. This Circular provides details concerning operational matters related to VA’s Real Estate Owned (REO) and direct loan portfolio, also known as VA’s National Portfolio, performed by Vendor Resource Management (VRM) under the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) REO and Portfolio Servicing Contract (RPSC).

2. Background. In connection with the termination of loans guaranteed by VA, servicers have the option to convey to VA the properties acquired at liquidation sales. VA manages these properties (known as REO) through disposition, which includes management, marketing, and disposition activities. VA has sold those acquired properties with seller financing, known as a Vendee loan, which required loan servicing by VA. In addition, VA has, from time to time, acquired or refunded VA-guaranteed loans from private servicers in order to modify the loans at terms beyond the capability of the private servicers so that Veteran borrowers will be able to retain their homes. These loans are known as repurchase loans (4600 or loans repurchased under 38 C.F.R. 36.4600) and refunded loans (loans acquired under 38 Code of Federal Regulations [C.F.R.] 36.4320),
respectively. VA also makes direct loans to Native American Veterans on trust lands under the Native American Direct Loan (NADL) program. In aggregate, these four loan products are known as the National Portfolio. The servicing of the National Portfolio is one of the components that is outsourced to a private contractor under the RPSC contract. This contract was awarded to Vendor Resource Management (VRM) on June 1, 2017, with an effective date of July 1, 2017, for up to 10
years. This contract also includes the facilitation and management of United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) properties. Through this contract, VRM subcontracts the mortgage servicing of VA’s National Portfolio. Effective December 1, 2017, mortgage servicing will be subcontracted by VRM to BSI Financial Services.

To access full circular, please click the source link above.

VA: Circular 26-20-16: Guidance for Non-Compliant Interest Rate Reduction Refinance Loans

Investor Update
April 20, 2020

Source: VA

1. Purpose. The purpose of this Circular is to outline VA’s expectations regarding loans that fail to meet the statutory requirements set forth in section 309 of Public Law 115-174, The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the Act), and codified at 38 U.S.C. § 3709.

2. Background. Section 309 of the Act provides statutory criteria, i.e., fee recoupment, net tangible benefit test, and loan seasoning, that affect whether VA can guarantee refinance loans. VA notified lenders in VA Circular 26-19-22, Clarification and Updates to Policy Guidance for VA Interest Rate Reduction Refinance Loans (IRRRLs), that to receive and retain the full amount of VA’s guaranty, an IRRRL must meet the requirements of the Act. The Circular also informed lenders that they may take steps to cure noncompliant IRRRLs where the loan application was initiated on or after May 25, 2018, and before the publication date of the Circular, August 8, 2019.

3. Action. Lenders must ensure that all IRRRLs comply with the requirements outlined in VA Circular 26-19-22. VA expects lenders to self-identify, review, and cure any noncompliant VA-guaranteed IRRRLs at no cost to the borrower(s). Effective immediately, all lenders must:

a. Enterprise Level Reporting. Submit a list of all VA-guaranteed IRRRLs that currently do not meet statutory requirements, or were found to be non-compliant, in a given business quarter. The report must be submitted to VA by the 1st of every business quarter (January 1, April 1, July 1, September 1). Lenders without an IRRRL that is currently non-compliant should not file the report and/or notify VA. This report will be emailed to the Regional Loan Center (RLC) of jurisdiction for the lender’s corporate office. The email addresses for each of the RLCs are available at: https://www.benefits.va.gov/HOMELOANS/contact_rlc_info.asp.

(1) The report will include the methodology used to identify the noncompliant IRRRLs. The report will include all currently non-compliant IRRRLs with application dates on or after May 25, 2019, that have not been cured, regardless of whether they were reported in prior quarters. For each IRRRL listed, the lender must provide a certification that all noncompliant IRRRLs have been cured (or are in the process of being cured). For each loan, the lender must provide the VA LIN (Loan Identification Number) and all statutory requirement(s) that the loan does not meet (e.g., fee recoupment, net tangible benefit, loan seasoning, etc.).

b. Loan Level Reporting. Determine a plan to cure any noncompliant IRRRLs at no cost to the borrower(s). Loan cures may include, but are not limited to, interest rate reductions, principal balance reductions of fees and costs, or new refinance loans. If the loan has been paid in full, the lender can issue a check to the Veteran to cure a non-compliant IRRRL that resulted in financial losses (i.e. failure to meet recoupment, interest rate reduction requirements, etc). Please note that whatever action is taken, it must not result in any  additional costs, such as VA funding fees, discount points, or other loan-related fees and charges (i.e., appraisal fee, closing fee, title fee, credit report fee), to the borrower(s).

(1) The lender must provide supporting documentation of the cure. Supporting documentation must include evidence of the non-compliance such as the recoupment calculation, Closing Disclosure, first payment due date, etc. for review, outline the cure method(s), how borrowers are notified of the cure(s), the approximate timeframe for curing the IRRRLs, together with an actual/target completion date, and any curative actions completed to date. Corrective action and supporting documentation must be uploaded into WebLGY “Correspondence” as Document Association “IRRRL” > Document Type “IRRRL
Disclosure Compliance”. (Note: These documents should NOT be submitted to VA as a prior approval request.)

c. Loan seasoning issues. There is no cure for loan seasoning violations. For loan seasoning violations, VA will allow the lender to execute an indemnification agreement for the life of the loan, holding VA harmless against any and all claims associated with the VA guaranty. However, if these IRRRLs have other deficiencies that can be corrected (i.e., net tangible benefit and/or fee recoupment), lenders must cure these deficiencies before contacting VA regarding the indemnification agreement.

4. Oversight of Lender Actions. VA will audit non-compliant IRRRLs to ensure that appropriate action(s) was taken to bring the loans into compliance and that such action(s) did not result in any cost to the borrower(s). VA will notify the lender of any cure deficiencies identified and will provide the lender an opportunity to cure the deficiency.

5. Additional Questions. Enclosed with this Circular are some Frequently Asked Questions
(FAQs) labeled Exhibit A. For additional questions, please contact your VA Regional Loan
Center (RLC) by calling 1-877-827-3702 within the hours of operation between 8am to 6pm
EST.

6. Rescission: This Circular is rescinded April 1, 2023.

By Direction of the Under Secretary for Benefits

Jeffrey F. London
Director
Loan Guaranty Service

Tornadoes Damage Homes in Four States

Updated 4/23/20: The Weather Channel issued a report outlining continued severe storm activity affecting the Southern U.S.

Widespread Damage, Injuries, Flooding Reported as Storms Batter South for Second Day

Additional locations sustaining structural damage:

Mississippi

– Sandersville (Jones County, 39477)
– Shady Grove (Jones County, 39443)
– Soso (Jones County, 39480)


Disaster Alert

April 23, 2020

Source: The Weather Channel

Approximate locations (according to media outlets) sustaining structural damage:

Tornadoes

Georgia
– Moultrie (Colquitt County, 31768, 31776, 31788)

Oklahoma
– Madill (Marshall County, 73446)

Louisiana
– Alexandria (Rapides Parish, 71301, 71302, 71303, 71306, 71307, 71309, 71315)
– Woodworth (Rapides Parish, 71485)
*Concentrated damage reported in Robinson Bridge Road area

Texas
– Onalaska (Polk County, 77360)
*Damage reported in 10 subdivisions, including Paradise Acres

– Seven Oaks (Polk County, 77350)

Flooding

Louisiana

– Mansfield (DeSoto Parish, 71052)
*At least 20 homes reported as flooded

NOTE: This has not yet been declared a FEMA Major Disaster.

x

CEO

Alan Jaffa

Alan Jaffa is the Chief Executive Officer for Safeguard Properties, steering the company as the mortgage field services industry leader. He also serves on the board of advisors for SCG Partners, a middle-market private equity fund focused on diversifying and expanding Safeguard Properties’ business model into complimentary markets.

Alan joined Safeguard in 1995, learning the business from the ground up. He was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in 2002, and was named CEO in May 2010. His hands-on experience has given him unique insights as a leader to innovate, improve and strengthen Safeguard’s processes to assure that the company adheres to the highest standards of quality and customer service.

Under Alan’s leadership, Safeguard has grown significantly with strategies that have included new and expanded services, technology investments that deliver higher quality and greater efficiency to clients, and strategic acquisitions. He takes a team approach to process improvement, involving staff at all levels of the organization to address issues, brainstorm solutions, and identify new and better ways to serve clients.

In 2008, Alan was recognized by Crain’s Cleveland Business in its annual “40-Under-40” profile of young leaders. He also was named a NEO Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year® Award finalist in 2013.

x

Esq., General Counsel and EVP

Linda Erkkila

Linda Erkkila is the General Counsel and Executive Vice President for Safeguard Properties, with oversight of legal, human resources, training, and compliance. Linda’s broad scope of oversight covers regulatory issues that impact Safeguard’s operations, risk mitigation, strategic planning, human resources and training initiatives, compliance, insurance, litigation and claims management, and counsel related to mergers, acquisition and joint ventures.

Linda assures that Safeguard’s strategic initiatives align with its resources, leverage opportunities across the company, and contemplate compliance mandates. She has practiced law for 25 years and her experience, both as outside and in-house counsel, covers a wide range of corporate matters, including regulatory disclosure, corporate governance compliance, risk assessment, compensation and benefits, litigation management, and mergers and acquisitions.

Linda earned her JD at Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. She holds a degree in economics from Miami University and an MBA. Linda was previously named as both a “Woman of Influence” by HousingWire and as a “Leading Lady” by MReport.

x

COO

Michael Greenbaum

Michael Greenbaum is the Chief Operating Officer of Safeguard Properties, where he has played a pivotal role since joining the company in July 2010. Initially brought on as Vice President of REO, Mike’s exceptional leadership and strategic vision quickly propelled him to Vice President of Operations in 2013, and ultimately to COO in 2015. Over his 14-year tenure at Safeguard, Mike has been instrumental in driving change and fostering innovation within the Property Preservation sector, consistently delivering excellence and becoming a trusted partner to clients and investors.

A distinguished graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, Mike earned a degree in Quantitative Economics. Following his graduation, he served in the U.S. Army’s Ordnance Branch, where he specialized in supply chain management. Before his tenure at Safeguard, Mike honed his expertise by managing global supply chains for 13 years, leveraging his military and civilian experience to lead with precision and efficacy.

x

CFO

Joe Iafigliola

Joe Iafigliola is the Chief Financial Officer for Safeguard Properties. Joe is responsible for the Control, Quality Assurance, Business Development, Marketing, Accounting, and Information Security departments. At the core of his responsibilities is the drive to ensure that Safeguard’s focus remains rooted in Customer Service = Resolution. Through his executive leadership role, he actively supports SGPNOW.com, an on-demand service geared towards real estate and property management professionals as well as individual home owners in need of inspection and property preservation services. Joe is also an integral force behind Compliance Connections, a branch of Safeguard Properties that allows code enforcement professionals to report violations at properties that can then be addressed by the Safeguard vendor network. Compliance Connections also researches and shares vacant property ordinance information with Safeguard clients.

Joe has an MBA from The Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University, is a Certified Management Accountant (CMA), and holds a bachelor’s degree from The Ohio State University’s Honors Accounting program.

x

Business Development

Carrie Tackett

Business Development Safeguard Properties