As Nonbank Servicers Grow, Another State Adds Licensing for Them

Industry Update
January 24, 2018

Pennsylvania will soon start accepting applications for new servicing licensing requirements added to address the growth of nondepositories.

The Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities plans to start accepting new applications for nonbank servicing licenses through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System starting April 1. The deadline for the receipt of applications is June 30.

The amendments to the state’s Mortgage Licensing Act address national growth in the market share of nonbank servicers and give Pennsylvania a similar authority as 36 other states, according to a press release issued by the department Tuesday.

Nonbank servicers previously have not been licensed in the state, and servicing issues have been one of the top types of complaints the department has received in recent years.

Licensed servicers must have and maintain the following: a minimum net worth of $250,000, fidelity bond coverage with accordance with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac’s guidelines, and a $500,000 surety bond, according to Pennsylvania’s Senate Bill 751, which Gov. Tom Wolf signed into law last month.

Servicers are defined as “a person who engages in the mortgage loan business by directly or indirectly servicing a mortgage loan” in the bill.

Mortgage lenders that are also servicers don’t need a separate license, but companies that aren’t lenders and service loans for others do, according to a report on the amendment by Leonard Bernstein and Robert Jaworski, attorneys at law firm Reed Smith.

Bank affiliates have some exemption from licensing but have to comply with other MLA requirements. While Pennsylvania exempts originators with offices in the state that don’t conduct transactions there from the MLA, the amendment doesn’t exempt servicers.

The department is open to industry inquiries about the new rules.

“We believe in smart regulation, not regulation for the sake of regulation,” Department Secretary Robin Wiessmann said in the press release. “At the Department of Banking and Securities, we welcome questions and discussions.”

Source: National Mortgage News

Arizona Bill Would Make it Easier for HOAs to Take Your Home

Legislation Update
January 10, 2017

Currently, Arizona homeowners associations can foreclose on owners if they fail to pay their dues for a year or get behind by $1,200 — whichever comes first.

But a bill introduced by one of Arizona’s most powerful Republican senators would allow HOA foreclosures after six months, with no minimum debt.

Sen. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, the primary sponsor of Senate Bill 1080, said six months of avoiding payments is a serious infraction.

“Tell a landlord that not paying him for six months isn’t a big deal. It is a big deal,” he said.

But the proposal already has opponents.

“This is a dangerous bill,” said Dennis Legere of the Arizona Homeowners Coalition.

Legere’s grassroots group has fought for homeowner protections against HOAs at the Legislature for the past several years. When Kavanagh introduced the bill late Monday, the group began organizing its opposition.

Legere said the bill would make it easier and faster for HOAs to turn to foreclosure instead of working out a payment plan or taking other, less severe steps to recoup the funds.

“(Foreclosure) should be the absolute last resort, not the first,” Legere said.

A 2017 Arizona Republic investigation found HOAs are foreclosing on a record number of homeowners. Since 2015, HOAs have started foreclosure actions on more than 3,000 Phoenix-area homeowners.

Kavanagh told The Arizona Republic on Tuesday that he plans to amend the bill to apply only to “smaller HOAs,” which he said face a disproportionate burden when a homeowner stops paying assessments.

Assessments are used to maintain the community and can cover costs for things such as maintenance expenses for community pools and parks.

Kavanagh did not define “smaller” — he said he’s still gathering feedback from stakeholders — but used an HOA with five homes as an example.

“If you’ve got five units and one stops paying, it creates a hardship for the other four,” he said.

About half of Valley homeowners live in a community run by one of Arizona’s 9,000 HOAs. They vary widely in size.
HOA attorney and member of the Central Arizona chapter of the Community Associations Institute Joshua Bolen called Kavanagh’s legislation a “compromise.”

“Instead of making the process about a dollar amount, it (the legislation) makes it about how long the a person has been delinquent,” he said. “I don’t think this bill will encourage or discourage HOA foreclosures.”

Arizona real estate analyst Tina Tamboer said the legislation could hurt the housing market.

“If a homeowner only has six months, then they will have a harder time selling to avoid foreclosure,” said Tamboer, who is senior housing analyst with the Cromford Report.

Source: azcentral.com

Additional Resource:

Arizona State Legislature (SB 1080 full text)

Appeals Court Expands Ohio Statute of Limitations Decision

Industry Update
January 30, 2018

Editor’s note: This story was originally featured in the January issue of DS News, out now.

Recently, the Ohio Eighth District Court of Appeals expanded upon the Ohio Supreme Court’s Holden decision. In Holden, the court had determined that a foreclosure plaintiff is not barred from enforcing its mortgage interest against the property when the borrower’s personal obligation to pay the mortgage loan has been discharged in bankruptcy. According to the Eighth District, Holden applies to permit the foreclosure plaintiff to enforce its mortgage interest even if the plaintiff is barred from enforcing the promissory note because the statute of limitations has expired.

The facts of the Walker case at hand are a common set. The borrower has defaulted on the promissory note, but through a series of circumstances, the matter was not referred for foreclosure until after the six-year statute of limitations governing negotiable instruments has expired. These facts beg the question: Can the mortgagee pursue foreclosure even after the statute of limitations for enforcing the borrower’s obligation to pay the note expires? The Walker case answers the question in the affirmative. The Eighth District has applied the longer statutes of limitations governing contracts in writing and actions against real estate to permit mortgagees to recover on the mortgage instead of the promissory note.

Under Ohio law, the statute of limitations governing negotiable instruments is six years from the acceleration date. Accordingly while a party may be entitled to enforce a promissory note, it may not be entitled to obtain a judgment on the note because the six-year statute of limitations has expired. Notwithstanding this conclusion, the mortgagee may still have the right to pursue an ejection action or foreclosure because actions on the mortgage are governed by longer statutes of limitations under Ohio law.

As a result, the Ohio courts have provided a means by which mortgagees can enforce otherwise time-barred mortgage loan defaults. While this approach denies the mortgagee a personal judgment against the borrower, it solves the larger problem of permitting the mortgagee to liquidate the mortgaged property under many circumstances.

You can read more legal updates in the January 2018 Black Book issue of DS News, out now.

Source: DS News

The Next Crisis for Puerto Rico: A Crush of Foreclosures

Industry Update
December 16, 2017
 

Puerto Rico has had an awful decade — and it’s about to get worse.

First came a brutal 10-year recession and financial crisis that drove businesses from this island and left 44 percent of the population impoverished. Then, in September, Hurricane Maria, a powerful Category 4 storm, shredded buildings, wrecked the electrical power grid and possibly led to more than 1,000 deaths.

Now Puerto Rico is bracing for another blow: a housing meltdown that could far surpass the worst of the foreclosure crisis that devastated Phoenix, Las Vegas, Southern California and South Florida in the past decade. If the current numbers hold, Puerto Rico is headed for a foreclosure epidemic that could rival what happened in Detroit, where abandoned homes became almost as plentiful as occupied ones.

About one-third of the island’s 425,000 homeowners are behind on their mortgage payments to banks and Wall Street firms that previously bought up distressed mortgages. Tens of thousands have not made payments for months. Some 90,000 borrowers became delinquent as a consequence of Hurricane Maria, according to Black Knight Inc., a data firm formerly known as Black Knight Financial Services.

Puerto Rico’s 35 percent foreclosure and delinquency rate is more than double the 14.4 percent national rate during the depths of the housing implosion in January 2010. And there is no prospect of the problem’s solving itself or quickly.

“If there is no income, the people cannot make payments,” said Ricardo Ramos-González, coordinator of a consumer legal aid clinic at the University of Puerto Rico School of Law. “Thousands have lost their jobs, thousands of small business have closed, and thousands more have left the country.”

At the moment, dealing with a mortgage lender about a missed payment may be a distant concern for many of the 3.4 million people in Puerto Rico. They are literally still picking up the pieces, struggling to live without electricity or trying to get insurance companies to pay claims to repair their homes. More than 100,000 people are believed to have left to go live with friends and family on the mainland.

Residents won a reprieve when the federal government imposed a temporary moratorium on foreclosures, which stops banks and investors that bought mortgages at cut-rate prices from evicting delinquent borrowers or starting new foreclosures. Many lenders also have agreed to waive missed payments during the moratorium.

“We will see an avalanche of cases,” said Josue Castellanos-Otero, a lawyer, who said many of his housing clients were focused on getting insurance companies to pay to fix their damaged homes.

Repairing the housing market in Puerto Rico will take more than rebuilding storm-damaged homes and the electrical grid. It will involve banks and investors reworking tens of thousands of troubled mortgages and waiving missed payments.

The looming housing crisis threatens to upend the social structure on the island and means the aftereffects of the storm will be felt for years to come. It could be particularly painful for the elderly, who often have limited incomes and whose homes tend to be their most valuable assets.

Even before the storm, Puerto Rico was mired in a severe housing slump. Home prices over the past decade have fallen by 25 percent, and lenders have foreclosed or filed to foreclose on 60,000 home loans, according to the Puerto Rico state court system. Last year, there were 7,682 court-ordered foreclosures — a roughly 33 percent increase from 2007. Some 13,000 foreclosure cases are pending, Black Knight estimates.

And that is how Wall Street got into the mix.

Bargain Hunters

In the past several years, a slew of bargain-hunting banks, hedge funds and other financial institutions descended on Puerto Rico to scoop up distressed residential mortgages and foreclosed homes. The list includes big investment banks like Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs and smaller boutiques including Perella Weinberg and an affiliate of the private-equity firm TPG Capital, which is an investor in a Cayman Islands mortgage investment company.

The recent devastation is likely to further depress housing prices. That’s partly because the “mass exodus” of Puerto Ricans going to the continental United States means the demand for housing “has gone down substantially,” said Laurie Goodman, director of the Urban Institute’s Housing Finance Policy Center.

If normal patterns held, that would be bad news for the investment firms that gambled on Puerto Rico’s housing market. But normal patterns don’t necessarily apply here, given that some mortgages are guaranteed by a federal insurance fund.

Consider Blackstone Group, the big private equity firm. Blackstone owns a company, Finance of America Reverse, that specializes in a type of home loan called a reverse mortgage, which is guaranteed by the federal government.

The loans are a way for people 62 or older to tap the equity they have built up in their homes; the principal and interest are payable when the borrower dies. The loans require borrowers to keep paying taxes and homeowner’s insurance on a property. Reverse mortgages have a history of abuse. Lenders often don’t fully explain the loans’ terms.

There are 10,000 reverse mortgages in Puerto Rico, and Finance of America controls about 40 percent of the market, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which oversees the government insurance fund that guarantees a lender will be repaid on a reverse mortgage.

If Finance of America sells a foreclosed home for less than the value of the mortgage, the firm can make a claim to the insurance fund to make up the difference. In that case, taxpayers would be on the hook

Court records show that the Blackstone-controlled company is aggressive in its pursuit of — and foreclosures on — borrowers.

Since 2015, Finance of America and a predecessor firm have filed 500 foreclosures in federal court.

José González-López “feels harassed” after Finance of America initiated a foreclosure case against him for the third time in two years, according to his lawyer, Juan Carlos Cancio-Reichard. He said the first two cases had been dismissed after the lender incorrectly claimed Mr. González-López, 73, had not paid for homeowner’s insurance on the property.

Now Finance of America has claimed Mr. González-López did not pay property taxes on the house — something the borrower disputes. Mr. Cancio-Reichard said his client had recently gotten the Puerto Rico Treasury Department to certify there were no unpaid taxes on his account. The lawyer is asking Finance of America’s lawyer to voluntarily dismiss the case.

“José thinks they want to get him out of the house,” Mr. Cancio-Reichard said.

Sara Sefcovic, a Finance of America spokeswoman, said the firm could not speak about specific cases, but “foreclosure is a last resort for our company.”

She added that the firm is “required to follow federal guidelines for this program and have virtually no discretion over whether or not to initiate a foreclosure proceeding.”

To file a foreclosure for any reason other than the death of the borrower, a reverse mortgage lender must get approval from an outside mortgage-servicing firm working for the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Over the past three years, the department has given more than 1,500 such approvals to reverse mortgage lenders in Puerto Rico.

English Only

Many offshore lenders like Finance of America file foreclosure lawsuits in federal court in San Juan, where proceedings move much faster than in the island’s territorial courts.

It’s not just speed. In federal court, all legal filings are in English. In local court, they are in Spanish. Not being able to read legal filings puts defendants at a disadvantage.

“Sometimes people don’t show up in federal court because they don’t even know they have been sued,” said Carmen Cosme, a housing counselor.

Ms. Sefcovic said Finance of America “will provide documents for borrowers in Spanish to the extent allowed by H.U.D. and the law.”

The moratorium imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development on the more than 117,000 mortgages it insures in Puerto Rico, such as the reverse mortgage on Mr. González-López’s home, will expire on March 18. A moratorium on mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is due to expire on Dec. 31, although it is likely to be extended for a few months.

Mr. Ramos and other housing counselors said they would like the moratorium extended for a full year, although others argue that would only postpone an inevitable wave of foreclosures.

The moratorium doesn’t appear to be airtight. Finance of America Reverse, for instance, filed three foreclosure cases after the moratorium began on Sept. 17.

Ms. Sefcovic, the company spokeswoman, said the three cases “were referred to foreclosure” before the hurricane hit and the moratorium took effect.

Others continue to battle Finance of America in court despite the moratorium.

Leila Hernández Umpierre said her parents, both in their 80s, were being sued for a second time by Finance of America. Ms. Hernández Umpierre, a lawyer, said that her parents, who bought their house in Bayamón, P.R., in 1958, had been living without electrical power since the storm hit and that the stress of the looming foreclosure was adding to their anxiety.

“My father and mother don’t have much money, as do many older people in Puerto Rico,” said Ms. Hernández Umpierre, who spoke on behalf of her parents, Minerva Umpierre Vazquez and Jorge Hernández Rodríguez. “My father doesn’t want to talk to about it. It is very stressful for him.”

Finance of America, in court papers, said the foreclosure was warranted because the couple had failed to pay for homeowner’s insurance.

But the couple’s lawyer, Jorge A. Fernández-Reboredo, said there was proof the insurance was paid. When the lender raised a similar claim in a 2015 foreclosure lawsuit, a federal judge dismissed the case, noting that Finance of America’s “complaint fails to sufficiently specify grounds on which plaintiff seeks to initiate foreclosure.”

“They are being pretty aggressive,” Mr. Fernández-Reboredo said.

Source: The New York Times

Program Offers No-Interest Loans to Residents Facing Foreclosure

Industry Update
December 22, 2017

Michigan residents are being urged to take advantage of a federally-funded state program designed to prevent foreclosures, while the money is still available.

St. Joseph resident Mark Krager built his home by hand and has lived there for 23 years. Krager suffers from a back injury and is also on disability, contributing to his inability keep up with the property tax payments, putting him in jeopardy of losing his home.

He was one of several to attend an informational meeting at the Berrien County Administration Building on Dec. 20 for the federally funded Step Forward Program, which seeks to help people like Krager get back on their feet.

Berrien County Treasurer Bret Witkowski and Van Buren Treasurer Karen Makay joined Earl Poleski, the executive director of the Michigan State Housing Development Authority, which oversees the program, to urge residents across the state facing foreclosure to take advantage of the no-interest loan program, which offers up to $30,000. The loan covers property tax, mortgage and condo payments — or combination — and is paid directly to the mortgage company or treasurer.

To qualify, residents must own their home and have experienced a hardship such as a death in the family, layoff, divorce or medical injury, among other qualifying events.

Those who utilize the program will only be covered for the amount they owe. The loan is eligible for forgiveness if the resident stays in his or her home for a period of five years. The loan is forgiven at a rate of 20 percent of the amount borrowed per year.

“The idea is to help people stay in their houses,” Poleski said.

Mary Townley, the director of the homeownership division for MSHDA, said the economy suffers when residents lose their home to foreclosure, driving down property values and making the property vulnerable to vandalism.

Witkowski echoed this statement.

“This is a great opportunity for people to stabilize their home and personal lives,” Witkowski said. “We do not benefit as an economy by having properties that need to be foreclosed on. There is a repercussion.”

The state began offering the funds from the federal program in 2010 as part of the Troubled Assets Relief Program, which was signed into law in 2008. From July 2010 to October 2017, the program has doled out nearly $3.3 million for property tax and mortgage loans, assisting 384 homeowners facing foreclosure. In Cass County, more than $1 million has been disbursed for the same purposes, helping 118 homeowners. According to Townley, 38,000 homeowners across Michigan have been aided by the program since its inception.

According to Townley, some of the grant was spent on blight remediation. About $38 million of the Step Forward grant is left statewide and must be spent by 2020.

“We want to make sure that gets expended as appropriate,” Poleski said. “We wanted to let people know about it.”

Following the meeting, the less than a dozen in attendance were invited to ask questions.

For Krager, the program offers some hope. “I don’t want my home to go,” Krager said.

Source: National Mortgage News

Governor Larry Hogan Announces Statewide Violent Crime Initiatives

Industry Update
December 5, 2017

Includes Targeted Assistance for Baltimore City, Truth-in-Sentencing Legislation, Intelligence Sharing to Combat Gangs and Criminal Networks Across Maryland

ANNAPOLIS, MD – Governor Larry Hogan today joined with federal, state, and local law enforcement officers and officials to announce a series of initiatives to combat criminal gang enterprises and repeat violent offenders responsible for terrorizing Baltimore City and participating in violent crime throughout the state. The governor’s announcements include state and federal law enforcement assistance targeting the violent crime ravaging Baltimore City; legislation to ensure that violent criminals serve their full prison sentence; and a new, collaborative data-sharing network to help prosecutors and law enforcement bring down criminal networks across the state.

Joining the governor to make the announcement were Lt. Governor Boyd Rutherford; Johnny Hughes, U.S. Marshal for Maryland; Colonel William “Bill” Pallozzi, Superintendent of the Maryland State Police; Colonel Woodrow “Jerry” Jones, Chief of the Maryland Transportation Authority Police; Colonel Robert “Ken” Ziegler, Superintendent of the Maryland Natural Resources Police; Colonel Mike Wilson, Chief of the Department of General Services, Maryland Capitol Police; Colonel John Gavrilis, Chief of the Maryland Transit Administration Police; Glenn Fueston, Executive Director of the Governor’s Office of Crime Control and Prevention; Walter “Pete” Landon, Director of the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security; Chris Shank, Chief Legislative Officer; and Keiffer Mitchell, Senior Advisor to the Governor. Representatives of several federal law enforcement partners also attended, including Special Agent in Charge of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms Dan Board; Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration Don Hibbert; and Special Agent in Charge of the Homeland Security Investigations Baltimore Field Office Andre Watson.

“Let me be crystal clear – I have absolutely no tolerance whatsoever for these repeat violent offenders or these criminal gangs causing lawlessness in our streets,” said Governor Hogan. “Our focus is to give law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and judges the tools they need to get these violent criminals off the streets and into prison.”

In 2016, more than 330 drug trafficking organizations were identified as operating within Maryland, and law enforcement agencies identified over 10,000 individuals associated with gangs and over 5,000 firearms involved in crimes. The Baltimore Police Department has reported that nearly 90% of homicide victims have criminal records averaging over 10 arrests, and nearly half have been previously arrested for gun crimes.

To address the critical levels of violence in Baltimore, the governor announced several immediate steps state and federal agencies are taking to assist the Baltimore Police Department (BPD) in going after violent criminals. The governor directed the Maryland State Police and other state police agencies operating in the city to expand their patrols in order to establish a more visible police presence in high-crime areas. He also announced that the state police will assist the Baltimore Police Department with serving high-priority warrants for violent crime-related arrests, and that over 200 state Parole and Probation officers will partner with city officers to locate repeat violent parole offenders.

Governor Hogan also announced that the U.S. Marshals Service will be sending over 80 marshals and federally-designated officers to conduct an aggressive sweep of Baltimore City to assist the state and city with high-priority violent arrest warrants. Finally, the governor directed the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development and the Maryland Stadium Authority to work directly with the city to identify vacant properties in the highest-crime areas for expedited demolition under Project C.O.R.E., the joint state-city initiative that has already removed over 1,200 blighted properties across the city.

In addition to the measures targeting Baltimore City, the governor also announced several wide-ranging initiatives targeting violent criminal networks across the state. As the centerpiece of this statewide approach, the governor unveiled the Maryland Criminal Intelligence Network, a data-sharing system that will connect State-funded operational initiatives from strategic counties and cities with 36 federal, state, and local law enforcement task forces in order to break down jurisdictional barriers and enable law enforcement and prosecutors to target entire criminal enterprises. This initiative is made possible by Maryland’s new Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) statute, which was part of landmark anti-crime legislation that the governor pushed for and passed during the 2016 legislative session.

“Gang violence and violent crime is not limited to one city or one county – it is infecting communities everywhere,” said Governor Hogan. “Their poisoning of too many of our communities is far-reaching, and our administration is committed to doing whatever we can to assist local law enforcement in their mission to identify, disrupt, and dismantle these gangs and violent criminal networks.”

To provide leadership and operational coordination on these data-sharing efforts, the governor signed Executive Order 01.01.2017.30 to create the Governor’s Council on Gangs and Violent Criminal Networks, which will be comprised of members from local, state, and federal law enforcement and criminal justice agencies. The council will be chaired by Carroll County State’s Attorney Brian DeLeonardo and include: Colonel Pallozzi, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Corrections Secretary Steve Moyer, Executive Director Fueston, Maryland U.S. Attorney Robert Hur, Baltimore City Police Commissioner Kevin Davis, Prince George’s County Police Chief Hank Stawinski, Salisbury Police Chief Barbara Duncan, Charles County Sheriff Troy Berry, Washington County Sheriff Douglas Mullendore, Montgomery County State’s Attorney John McCarthy, Baltimore County State’s Attorney Scott Shellenberger, Baltimore City State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby, Frederick County State’s Attorney Charlie Smith, and Anne Arundel County State’s Attorney Wes Adams.

Governor Hogan also announced three new bills he will introduce as emergency legislation at the start of the 2018 legislative session to combat violent crime in Baltimore City and across the state. The first delivers on the governor’s promised truth-in-sentencing initiative, which will require second-time violent criminals to serve their full sentence, and make them ineligible for parole.

The administration’s second bill addresses the problem of repeat violent gun offenders failing to serve adequate time for their crimes by doubling the minimum sentence from five to ten years for repeat offenders who use firearms to commit felonies and violent crimes. The bill will require that the time be served consecutively to any other sentence, and includes additional penalties for individuals convicted of using a firearm in relation to drug trafficking if they are later found to illegally possess a firearm. The governor’s third bill will further strengthen Maryland’s anti-gang and RICO statutes by expanding the list of gang-related crimes that can be prosecuted across jurisdictional lines.

“With all of these actions we are announcing today, we are saying enough is enough. This is about getting our communities back, getting gangs and violent offenders off the streets, and saving lives,” said the governor.

Source: Office of Maryland Governor Larry Hogan

City to Begin Foreclosing on Abatement Properties with Outstanding Liens

Industry Update
December 6, 2017

BULLHEAD CITY — Council members voted Tuesday to approve a budget transfer that will allow Development Services and other city staff to begin foreclosure proceedings on unpaid liens placed on properties for removal of abandoned, dangerous and derelict buildings.

“People who have essentially shunned government and said ‘I’m not doing anything with my property,’ are losing those properties,” said City Manager Toby Cotter. “They will be sold on the county courthouse steps unless they pay.”

About $35,000 of the $110,000 request from General Fund Contingency to the Development Services Department will go toward legal fees associated with foreclosure Cotter said. The balance of the money requested is for continued removal of dangerous buildings as well as other nuisance abatements.

“Since we’ve been very active and aggressive in these regards, we have abated properties, placed liens on the properties and there are a number of people who have not paid us,” Cotter said. “We will be foreclosing on them.”

Glen Wiltse, city development services director, presented to council members a slide show with examples of recently abated properties and explained the process.

The city issues property owners a 60-day notice that says they have the option of repairing the property/structure or the city will remove it, Wiltse said. Property owners who want to repair their property are met and, along with city staff, develop a list of what needs to be done in order to keep their property and put it back into livable condition.

Owners who do not repair the property/structure receive a bill from the city for the cost of having it done, Wiltse said. The job is put out for competitive bid and the lowest bidder is selected to do the work.

“The city places a lien for that service whether it’s $3,500 or $5,000, whatever that cost is,” Cotter said. “Then (property owners) have the opportunity to pay us. For those who do not (pay) we are now going to foreclose on that property.”

The city has been involved in 166 demolitions and 369 lot cleanups over the past three years, Wiltse said. Currently, 43 properties are in various stages of abatement.

“We are sitting on hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of properties that we are now going to foreclose on,” Cotter said. “If you’re one of the residents or property owners who have gone through this process with us, pay us and we won’t foreclose on you. Otherwise we’re going to foreclose. That’s what the (budget transfer) money is for.”

Council members also voted to approve a request to amend with two additional plots a final plat for The Ridge at Fox Creek, including a new financial assurance through a property escrow agreement in the amount of $216,399. The requested water allocation amount of 4.03 acre-feet for the amended plat will be deducted from the city’s contract service area total and transferred from Fox Creek Estates’ overall allocation.

In his City Manager’s Report, Cotter informed council members that some Republic Services customers will have their trash pick-up day changed to Wednesdays in order to prevent drivers from violating federal laws that regulate drive times. Some routes on Mondays and Tuesdays have been taking between 14 and 16 hours to complete trash collection.

“The city’s franchise agreement allows Republic to do Wednesday trash pick-up, but the company has not been doing so in the past,” Cotter told council members. “Starting on Jan. 8, some residents who have Monday or Tuesday trash service will move to Wednesday trash service. Republic Services will be contacting all impacted customers. This does not impact Thursday and Friday recycling.”

Cotter also updated council members on recent special events and tournaments, including last weekend’s AYSO soccer tournament that hosted 40 teams at Rotary Park. Mohave High School will hold its soccer tournament today through Saturday at Rotary Park and Mohave High School. The 23rd annual Toys for Kids softball tournament brings 18 teams to town this weekend, and the city and Mohave High School partner to bring the annual high school basketball tournament to town Dec. 21-23.

“These events bring hundreds of athletes and thousands of spectators and families to our community,” Cotter said. “The idea of sports tourism in Bullhead City is real and it’s putting money into our restaurants, hotels, gas stations and retail outlets. The goal of hosting a sporting event or tournament every week in Bullhead City is becoming a reality.”

Cotter also reported that city crews plan to complete Bullhead Parkway striping today, but the fog seal is behind schedule due to high winds.

The next large neighborhood to receive street slurry treatment will be Arroyo Vista, Cotter said. For the second year in a row, crews remain on pace to meet the city’s goal of maintaining or paving 20 percent of the city’s streets.

Now in the 12th full week of this fiscal year, staff will be close to 400,000 square yards completed by the time this week ends, Cotter said. Material cost is still about 80 cents per square yard and total cost with labor and equipment depreciation is about $1 per square yard, about half of the typical micro bids the city received in the past.

Source: Mohave Valley Daily News

Abandoned Property Bill Proposed in Missouri

Legislation Update
December 7, 2017

Current Bill Summary

SB 780 – This act allows a person who is not the owner of real property in Kansas City or who is a creditor holding a lien interest on the property, and who suspects that the real property may be abandoned, to enter the premises to visually inspect the property to determine whether it is abandoned. If the person makes a good faith determination based on the inspection that the property is abandoned, the person may secure the property, remove trash or debris from the grounds, landscape, maintain, or mow the grounds, and remove or paint over graffiti. This act defines what it means for a property to be “abandoned”, and provides immunity for the person entering the property from claims of civil and criminal trespass and all other civil immunity unless the act or omission constitutes gross negligence or willful, wanton, or intentional misconduct.

This act specifies that, in the case of real property that is subject to a mortgage or deed of trust, the creditor holding the debt secured by the mortgage or deed of trust may not enter the premises of the real property if entry is barred by an automatic stay issued by a bankruptcy court.

This act is identical to SB 299 (2017) and SB 742 (2016), and is substantially similar to SB 228 (2015).

Source: Missouri General Assembly (SB 780 full text)

Pertinent Legislation Proposed in Mass.

Legislation Update
November 25, 2017

House Bills

MA H.956

  • Title: An Act to prevent unnecessary vacancies in foreclosed homes
  • Description: Would “protect tenants and prevent vacancies in foreclosed homes”.
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H956
  • Status: On agenda of 9/26/2017 hearing with the Judiciary Committee
  • Note: See S.841 below

MA  H.1089

  • Title: An Act relative to the sale of foreclosed residential property to certain cities and towns.
  • Description: Would “grant cities or towns the right of first refusal on foreclosed residential property”.
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H1089
  • Status: On agenda of 10/31/2017 hearing with the Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

MA H.1109

  • Title: An Act relative to vacant and abandoned property in the Commonwealth
  • Description: Would “authorize municipalities to implement an abandoned property registration and security program“.
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H1109
  • Status: On agenda of 10/31/2017 hearing with the Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

MA H.1115

  • Title: An Act to minimize foreclosures and their harm
  • Description: Would use “municipal actions to minimize foreclosures and resulting vacancies”.
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H1115
  • Status: Hearing scheduled for 11/14/2017 with the Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

MA H.2349

  • Title: An Act to amend the foreclosure statute to require judicial foreclosure
  • Description: Would “require judicial review of foreclosures on residential mortgages”.
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H2349
  • Status: On agenda of 9/26/2017 hearing with the Judiciary Committee
  • Note: See S.763 below

MA H.2957

  • Title: An Act to require banks, lending institutions, mortgage companies or sub lenders to file with the registry of deeds in each county within thirty days of mortgage sales and/or foreclosures of property
  • Description: Would require “certain financial institutions to file sale and foreclosure information with registries of deeds.”
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/H2957
  • Status: Referred to Joint Committee on Financial Services

Senate Bills

S.763

  • Title: An Act to amend the foreclosure statute to require judicial foreclosure
  • Description: Would “amend the foreclosure statute to require judicial foreclosure”.
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/S763
  • Status: On agenda of 9/26/2017 hearing with the Judiciary Committee
  • Note: See H.2349 above

S.841

  • Title: An Act preventing unnecessary vacancies in foreclosed homes
  • Description: Would “prevent unnecessary vacancies in foreclosed homes”.
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/S841
  • Status: On agenda of 9/26/2017 hearing with the Judiciary Committee
  • Note: See H.956 above

S.884

  • Title: An Act clarifying municipal authority regarding cash sureties and foreclosures
  • Description: Would “clarify municipal authority regarding cash sureties and foreclosures”.
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/S884
  • Status: On agenda of 9/26/2017 hearing with the Judiciary Committee

S.2187

  • Title: An Act protecting abandoned animals in vacant properties
  • Description: Would “abandoned animals in vacant properties”.
  • Current text: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/S2187
  • Status: 10/23/2017 Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means

Here are the changes to California’s Homeowner Bill of Rights you need to know

Industry Update
November 21, 2017

The New Year brings new changes

Riddled throughout California’s Homeowner Bill of Rights are the words “repealed” effective “Jan. 1, 2018.” Unfortunately, many loan servicers assume that means the entire HOBR will be repealed and that all they have to worry about going forward is complying with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Loss Mitigation Rules.

Unfortunately, that is not the case. Many sections of HOBR are being replaced by new rules that automatically go into effect Jan. 1, 2018. In many instances, the new provisions are less onerous than their predecessors.

But, in some very key areas, the new provisions can cause servicers more problems. The key is to understand what provisions are being changed and how they impact your compliance procedures.

For starters, “HOBR II” attempts to remove the distinction between servicers conducting more or less than 175 annual foreclosures. In most respects, all servicers are treated the same going forward.

Civil Code Section 2923.55 will be history in 2018. Going forward, Section 2923.5 sets forth the pre-NOD contact requirements for Servicers of all sizes. The two statutes are substantially similar, except that the written notice regarding servicemembers and the statement that the borrower may request a copy of the note, deed of trust, assignment, or payment history will no longer be required starting in 2018.

Since the provisions are substantially the same, we anticipate that violations of the pre-NOD contact requirements will continue to be a popular allegation in lawsuits and therefore, recommend documenting the pre-Notice of Default contact and/or due diligence steps with precise details in case you need it later as evidence. Further, please make sure your foreclosure trustees update their compliance declarations to reflect the code change.

The provisions in Section 2923.6 prohibiting dual tracking will be replaced by the (new) Section 2924.11, which prohibits recording a notice of sale or conducting a foreclosure sale upon receipt of a “complete application for a foreclosure prevention alternative.” Historically, servicers were only required to stay foreclosure proceedings upon receipt of a complete loan modification application.  Beginning Jan. 1, 2018, the dual tracking prohibition applies to all applications for all foreclosure prevention alternatives. 

Another change is that Section 2924.11 does not require an appeal period following a written denial. Instead, the denial of a first lien loan modification application shall state with specificity the reasons for the denial and shall include a statement that the borrower may obtain additional documentation supporting the denial decision upon written request to the mortgage servicer. Oddly, the new Section 2924.11 does not appear to prohibit recording a Notice of Default when there is a pending complete foreclosure prevention alternative. However, the CFPB rules do.

The old Section 2923.6(g) excused servicers from having to review multiple loan modification applications that did not involve a “material change in financial circumstances.” While that provision’s vagueness caused servicers many sleepless nights, at least it afforded some relief. Unfortunately, that provision is gone at the end of the year and there is no replacement.

Therefore, it is possible that servicers must review multiple applications, regardless of whether there is a material change in financial circumstances. That said, if a servicer finds itself in trouble with an issue with multiple applications, there may be an out, but one that requires further discussion.

Section 2923.7 does not expire and remains the same as before, requiring a single point of contact, also known as a “SPOC,” to communicate the loss mitigation application process, coordinate documents, notify borrower of any missing documents, and have access to current information to accurately inform borrower of the current status. Note that this section still only applies to servicers who conduct more than 175 qualifying annual foreclosures.

Section 2924.10 will be expiring, which means servicers will no longer be required to provide a written acknowledgment within five business days of receiving loan modification documents. However, the CFPB rules still require an acknowledgement letter.

With Section 2924(a)(5) expiring, servicers or their foreclosure trustees will no longer have to provide written notice to a borrower when a sale is postponed more than 10 business days.

Section 2924.12 still creates a private right of action for a borrower to enforce HOBR; but it will now only apply to material violation of “sections 2923.5, 2923.7, 2924.11, 2924.17.”  Like its predecessor, the borrower is only entitled to injunctive relief prior to the Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale recording. 

But, after it records, the servicer is potentially liable for any actual economic damages resulting from a material violation of the covered sections and, if the court finds that a material violation was “intentional or reckless, or resulted from willful misconduct by a mortgage servicer, mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent,” the greater of treble actual damages or $50,000. This section also still allows for attorney’s fees for a prevailing borrower.

With Section 2924.17 remaining in effect, all servicers, regardless of size, must still ensure that before recording or filing a declaration pursuant to section 2923.5, notice of default, notice of sale, assignment of deed of trust, substitution of trustee, or a declaration or affidavit in court relative to a foreclosure proceeding, that it has reviewed competent and reliable evidence to substantiate the borrower’s default and the right to foreclose, including the borrower’s loan status and loan information. However, some of the government enforcement provisions will expire at the end of 2017.

Unfortunately, the challenges with handling “complete,” but last-minute, loan modification applications still exist. The new HOBR sections still do not directly address what happens when a servicer receives a complete loan modification application minutes or hours before a foreclosure sale.

In fact, the new HOBR actually complicates matters by extending the dual tracking restriction to all foreclosure prevention alternatives, not just loan modifications. That said, like before, servicers can take steps to address how to deal with these last minute applications ahead of time; but, it will require a separate discussion.

What do all of these changes mean from a litigation perspective? Unfortunately, we anticipate continued litigation over alleged violations of HOBR. In the short term, most lawsuits will implicate the pre-Jan. 1, 2018 HOBR due to when the foreclosure documents were recorded and when the subject loan modification reviews took place. Down the road, litigation could actually increase if servicers do not get ahead of the year-end changes.

Source: HousingWire