FHFA Issues Update on the Common Securitization Platform

Investor Update
September 15, 2015

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) today released An Update on the Common Securitization Platform.  The Update details progress made in the development of a new infrastructure for the securitization of single-family mortgages by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Developing the Common Securitization Platform (CSP) is a key goal of FHFA’s 2014 Strategic Plan for the Conservatorships of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Building and testing the CSP is a 2015 Scorecard item for both companies and for Common Securitization Solutions, LLC (CSS), a joint venture company that was established by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to lead the work on this project.

The Update includes details on the organizational structure of CSS and the various modules that comprise the CSP and their functions.  In addition, the Update looks ahead to the anticipated announcement in 2016 of an implementation date for Release 1, the initial use of the CSP by Freddie Mac, followed by Release 2 that will enable both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to use the CSP to issue Single Securities.  The Update also describes ongoing efforts to seek input from industry stakeholders, including formation of a Single Security/CSP Industry Advisory Group. 

“Developing the CSP is a large scale, multi-faceted project,” said FHFA Director Melvin L. Watt.  “This Update details significant progress that has been made to date in building and testing the CSP, and toward launching a Single Security.  Together, these projects will bring us much closer to the goal of improving the overall liquidity of the mortgage market. They will also reduce costs for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and taxpayers,” Watt said.

FHFA welcomes public input on this Update from interested parties.  Input can be submitted electronically via FHFA.gov, or to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Office of Strategic Initiatives, 400 7th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20024.  All submissions received will be made public and posted to FHFA’s website.

Link to An Update on the Common Securitization Platform

Contacts:
?Media: Corinne Russell (202) 649-3032 / Stefanie Johnson (202) 649-3030
Consumers: Consumer Communications or (202) 649-3811

Source: FHFA

FHFA: Foreclosure Prevention Actions Top 3.5 Million Through Second Quarter 2015

Investor Update
September 28, 2015

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) today reported that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac completed 63,593 foreclosure prevention actions in the second quarter of 2015, bringing the total number of foreclosure prevention actions to over 3.5 million since the start of the conservatorships in September 2008. These measures have helped more than 2.9 million borrowers stay in their homes, including more than 1.8 million who received permanent loan modifications. ?

Further details can be found in FHFA’s second quarter Foreclosure Prevention Report, which also includes data on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac home retention actions, delinquency data and real estate owned (REO) inventory. FHFA publishes the report data in an online, interactive Borrower Assistance Map accessible through FHFA.gov.

Other foreclosure prevention data for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac noted in the quarterly report include:

  • The REO inventory of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac declined 14 percent during the second quarter to 86,515, marking the first time REO inventory has been below 100,000 since 2009.
  • The number of 60+ day delinquent loans declined another 6 percent during the quarter.
  • Approximately 31 percent of all permanent loan modifications in the second quarter helped to reduce homeowners’ monthly payments by over 30 percent.
  • The serious delinquency rate of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans fell to 1.6 percent at the end of the second quarter.

Attachments:
Foreclosure Prevention Report – 2Q2015
3.64 MB

Contacts:
Media: Corinne Russell (202) 649-3032 / Stefanie Johnson (202) 649-3030
Consumers: Consumer Communications or (202) 649-3811?

Source: FHFA

FHA INFO #15-70: Single Family Partial Claim Documentation and Delivery

Investor Update
September 2, 2015

Today, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) published Mortgagee Letter 15-18, “Single Family Partial Claim Documentation and Delivery Requirements,” the purpose of which is to:

  • Remind mortgagees of the procedures for preparing and submitting Partial Claim documents to HUD;
  • Revise the required timeframe for mortgagees to submit to HUD the original promissory note associated with a Partial Claim; and
  • Describe the penalties for a mortgagee’s noncompliance with HUD’s Partial Claim requirements at 24 CFR § 203.371 and other published guidance.

The policies set forth in this Mortgagee Letter modify or supersede, where there is conflict, Mortgagee Letters 2013-32, 2013-19, 2012-22, 2009-23, 2008-21, and 2003-19 (Sections H, Q, and R).

The revisions to Mortgagee Letter 15-18 are effective immediately for all partial claim documents executed on or after September 1, 2015.

Quick Links

Source: HUD (Please click to view update in its entirety.)

Fannie Mae Utilizes Technology to Achieve Housing Goals

Investor Update
September 24, 2015

Fannie Mae has built a strong and flexible technology organization in order to help the Enterprise more efficiently achieve its goals, which are to help provide people with access to affordable mortgage credit and to reduce risk to the taxpayer, according to a commentary from Bruce Lee, SVP and Chief Information Officer at Fannie Mae.

“When we announced in December 2014 that Fannie Mae would again purchase loans with as little as 3 percent down payments, our technology organization worked to update our systems quickly so that lenders could begin delivering these loans to us within days,” Lee said. “Thousands of families have benefited from this loan option.”

Today, various Fannie Mae technology tools that run on an interconnected technical infrastructure are used by lenders and servicers to help at-risk borrowers prevent foreclosure, to underwrite mortgage loans, and to subsequently check the quality of those loans.

Those tools include:

  • Desktop Underwriter (DU), which has been used for more than 20 years, and has been continually enhanced during that time. DU is a comprehensive underwriting system that helps lenders evaluate loans and determine if those loans meet the credit risk standards and eligibility criteria set forth by Fannie Mae. It has helped lenders provide mortgages to millions of Americans at an increased speed and lower cost.
  • Collateral Underwriter (CU), which builds on the success of DU. It helps reduce risk for Fannie Mae and lenders by helping lenders evaluate appraisals for loans and ensuring values are appropriate and property information is accurate. Lee said that CU “is a key part of building a stronger housing system for the future. We recently integrated CU with DU to further support our lenders’ risk management and underwriting capabilities.”
  • EarlyCheck helps lenders identify potential problems earlier in the process, which provides greater certainty that the loan will meet Fannie Mae’s eligibility requirements. Lenders who use EarlyCheck have the opportunity to fix potential issues prior to selling the loan to Fannie Mae, which reduces the risk of repurchase.
  • Servicing Management Default Underwriter (SMDU) helps those who service Fannie Mae loans determine what loss mitigation options are available to borrowers who are struggling to make mortgage payments. With SMDU, servicers can make real-time decisions to help those borrowers prevent foreclosure through any number of loss mitigation options (loan modifications, short sales, repayment plans).

Technology is also playing a key role in reducing Fannie Mae’s risk profile, Lee said.

“In order to build our Connecticut Avenue Securities (CAS) offering, which allows investors to take some of the credit risk that Fannie Mae traditionally held on loans in its book of business, we had to build a new set of tools, platforms, and reporting capabilities,” he said. “In addition, technologies such as Desktop Underwriter and Collateral Underwriter help to reduce risk on the loans that Fannie Mae acquires. These tools have been instrumental in transferring a portion of the credit risk on nearly $400 billion of mortgages since 2013.”

Source:

DS News

Fannie Mae Technology Solutions Page

Fannie Mae Updated Florida AAA Matrix

Investor Update
September 25, 2015

Excess Attorney Fee Request Guidelines

Fannie Mae’s approval is required for any foreclosure-related or bankruptcy-related attorney fees that exceed the maximum allowable attorney fees set forth in our Servicing Guide, Servicing Guide exhibits and related updates, or other Fannie Mae guidance.

The AAA Matrix provides state-specific excess fee process guidelines and includes an excess fee process overview, as well as additional procedures and specific fee request requirements.
 
The matrix refers to applicable Servicing Guide provisions and other policies. Fannie Mae provides the AAA Matrix directly to the attorneys and updates the matrices as needed.
 
The process encompasses only attorney fees for legal services provided. It does not cover costs (anything other than an attorney fee). We review and reimburse costs to servicers through the expense reimbursement (or claims) process.
 
Only attorneys may submit excess fee requests. Fannie Mae does not accept excess fee requests from servicers.

Source: Fannie Mae (Excess Attorney Fee Guidelines page full version)

Fannie Mae SVC-2015-12 Servicing Guide Updates

Investor Update
September 9, 2015

The Servicing Guide has been updated to include the following:

  • Updates to E-filing and TX Posting Costs
  • Adjustments to Standard and Streamlined Modifications
  • Increase to Mortgage Release Incentives
  • Updates to the Application of Borrower HAMP Incentives
  • Retirement of Form 181HFA
  • Correction to Insured Loss Events Requirements
  • Reminder of Payment Change Notification Requirements for Mortgage Loans Subject to StepInterest Rate Adjustments
  • Miscellaneous Revision

 

Source: Fannie Mae

Fannie Mae Standard Modification Interest Rate Adjustment

Investor Update
September 9, 2015

The Fannie Mae Standard Modification Interest Rate is subject to periodic adjustments based on an evaluation of prevailing market rates. The servicer must use the current Fannie Mae Standard Modification Interest Rate indicated below when evaluating a borrower for a conventional mortgage loan modification, excluding Fannie Mae HAMP Modifications.

NOTE: As a reminder, the interest rate used to determine the final modification terms must be the same fixed interest rate that was used when determining eligibility for the Trial Period Plan and calculating the Trial Period Plan payment.

Source: Fannie Mae

Fannie Mae: SMDU: A Helping Hand for Borrowers and Servicers

Investor Update
September 8, 2015

The Housing Industry Forum released an article discussing the benefits of the Servicing Management Default Underwriter (SMDU).

The efficiency, certainty and simplicity that loan servicers have gained by using Servicing Management Default Underwriter™ (SMDU™) add up to an even more profound benefit–empowering servicers to give their customers who are delinquent on their mortgages timely and accurate decisions to avoid foreclosure.

“Our primary goal is to offer the borrower a helping hand,” says Ron Malik, vice president of collections and loss mitigation at Dovenmuehle Mortgage. “We want to help them find a retention solution to stay in their property or, if they’re looking at a liquidation, identify the right solution to walk away gracefully. SMDU allows us to look at all of those options at the same time so that we’re able to understand which solution best helps borrowers resolve their hardship.”

SMDU, introduced by Fannie Mae in 2011, simplifies the eligibility determination for all Fannie Mae loss mitigation programs, enabling servicers to confidently provide faster workout decisions to homeowners who are at risk of foreclosure and for whom time is of the essence.

This free tool ensures Fannie Mae’s loss mitigation policies are correctly interpreted and deployed in a way that significantly cuts cycle times, costs and uncertainty for loan servicers.

“SMDU clearly offers us the ability to work in a more efficient and accurate manner with regard to Fannie Mae’s modification eligibility requirements,” says Michael Small, director of loss mitigation at CitiMortgage. “Essentially, we replaced a very manual process that we previously used to decision Fannie Mae modifications with one that is now fully automated due to our direct integration with SMDU.”

Removing Risk

When a borrower becomes delinquent, servicers are on the front line to help them find a solution. As loss mitigation options have become more diverse and the decisioning criteria more specific, servicers were challenged to keep up with the rapid pace of change. SMDU was developed, in part, to help servicers manage those challenges.

“Our initial focus with SMDU was to ensure that Fannie Mae loss mitigation policy was being interpreted and executed correctly and consistently from servicer to servicer and from homeowner to homeowner,” says Pat Kopins, director of product development at Fannie Mae. “Homeowners should receive the full benefit of our policy regardless of who services their loan. We wanted to provide a solution to servicers that, no matter how fast changes were happening, both borrowers and servicers received the benefit as soon as possible and with as little effort as possible.”

In addition to the risk of misinterpreting loss mitigation policies, such policy changes bring costs and other risks to servicers.

“Every change represents some level of investment for servicers,” Kopins says. “To implement a policy change, they put time, resources and energy into it. They have to understand and interpret the policy, make the necessary software changes, test the changes and then operationally deploy the new policy.”

SMDU is updated when Fannie Mae policy changes, removing that burden.

“SMDU enables servicers to focus on the process, such as submitting accurate and complete data, and creating a great customer experience,” says Kopins. “We at Fannie Mae do the heavy lifting by ensuring SMDU’s decisions are compliant with Fannie Mae workout evaluation policies. By taking work off the servicers’ plates, we free up resources that they can use to move their business forward in other areas.”

Delivering Real-Time Decisions

Fifty-six loan servicers now rely on SMDU. Some servicers access the decisioning tool directly through their own loss mitigation platform, while others access it via third-party vendors. Using data provided by servicers, SMDU evaluates a homeowner for all of Fannie Mae’s workout options and delivers a real-time eligibility determination to the servicer—and it’s available 24/7.

“Quicken Loans is a technology and client service company that is amazingly good at originating and servicing mortgages,” says Jenny Smolek, director of servicing technology at Quicken Loans. “SMDU integrates with our technology-driven servicing platform very well and allows us to quickly help our clients who may be having difficulty making their payments.”

Tracy Zobel, divisional vice president of default at Quicken Loans, adds: “With every iteration, SMDU gets stronger. The tool makes it even easier to work together with Fannie Mae to help keep at-risk clients in their homes.”

For CitiMortgage, transitioning from manual processes to the seamless automation of SMDU has helped provide clarity to borrowers about their loss mitigation options.

“SMDU benefits the borrower by providing a more timely decision and minimizing the opportunity for errors,” Small says.

Source: Fannie Mae/Housing Industry Forum

Fannie Mae LL-2015-05 Execution and Retention of Loan Modification Agreements

Investor Update
September 30, 2015

Executing a Mortgage Loan Modification

This Lender Letter is a reminder of servicer responsibilities related to executing, recording and/or retaining a Loan Modification Agreement. The servicer must take the actions in the following table for all mortgage loan modifications.

The servicer must…

Ensure that the Loan Modification Agreement is executed by the borrower.

Note: The servicer may encounter circumstances where a co-borrower signature is not obtainable for the Loan Modification Agreement for reasons such as mental incapacity or military deployment. When a co-borrower’s signature is not obtainable and the servicer decides to continue with the mortgage loan modification, the servicer must appropriately document the basis for the exception in the servicing records.

Execute and record, if applicable, the Loan Modification Agreement based upon the entity that is the mortgagee of record in accordance with Servicing Guide A2-1-03, Execution of Legal Documents.

Send to the document custodian the originals of any document that changes the mortgage loan terms, including a Loan Modification Agreement, in accordance with Servicing Guide A2-5.1-02, Overview of Individual Mortgage Loan Files and Records.

Note: The Loan Modification Agreement must be annotated with the Fannie Mae loan number and, if applicable, the MERS number, and, if Fannie Mae’s DDC is the document custodian, mailed to The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, NA (see Servicing Guide F-4-03, List of Contacts).

Please see the following Servicing Guide Procedures for additional information:

 

Source: Fannie Mae

Fannie Mae LL-2015-04 Nevada HOA Litigation

Investor Update
September 16, 2015

Servicer Reliance on HERA: Nevada Properties

On September 18, 2014, the Nevada Supreme Court held that a homeowners association’s non-judicial foreclosure of a “super-priority” lien could extinguish an existing first deed of trust. See SFR Investments v. U.S. Bank (Nev. 2014). In response, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and various GSE servicers have asserted in litigation that the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA), prohibits the extinguishment of GSE liens absent FHFA’s consent as conservator of the GSEs.

FHFA’s Statement on Servicer Reliance on HERA

For reference, attached is the Servicer Reliance on HERA in Foreclosures Involving Homeownership Associations statement issued by FHFA on August 28, 2015, regarding servicers’ reliance on HERA in connection with Nevada “super-priority” lien foreclosures and related HOA litigation.

Servicer Obligation to Escalate All Non-Routine Litigation

Fannie Mae reminds the servicer to escalate via submission of the Non-Routine Litigation Form (Form 20) as specified in Servicing Guide E-1.3-01, General Servicer Responsibilities for Non-Routine Matters all non-routine litigation involving actions that challenge the validity, priority, or enforceability of a Fannie Mae mortgage loan or that seek to impair Fannie Mae’s interest in an acquired property.

Additionally, Servicing Guide E-1.3-02, Reporting Non-Routine Litigation to Fannie Mae specifies servicers must report non-routine litigation to Fannie Mae within two business days of the servicer receiving notice of the litigation.

The servicer should contact its Servicing Consultant, Portfolio Manager, or Fannie Mae’s Credit Portfolio Management’s Servicer Support Center at 1-888-FANNIE5 (1-888-326-6435) with any questions regarding this Lender Letter.

Malloy Evans
Vice President
Credit Portfolio Management

Source: Fannie Mae (attached Servicer Reliance on HERA in Foreclosures Involving Homeownership Association statement)

x

CEO

Alan Jaffa

Alan Jaffa is the Chief Executive Officer for Safeguard Properties, steering the company as the mortgage field services industry leader. He also serves on the board of advisors for SCG Partners, a middle-market private equity fund focused on diversifying and expanding Safeguard Properties’ business model into complimentary markets.

Alan joined Safeguard in 1995, learning the business from the ground up. He was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in 2002, and was named CEO in May 2010. His hands-on experience has given him unique insights as a leader to innovate, improve and strengthen Safeguard’s processes to assure that the company adheres to the highest standards of quality and customer service.

Under Alan’s leadership, Safeguard has grown significantly with strategies that have included new and expanded services, technology investments that deliver higher quality and greater efficiency to clients, and strategic acquisitions. He takes a team approach to process improvement, involving staff at all levels of the organization to address issues, brainstorm solutions, and identify new and better ways to serve clients.

In 2008, Alan was recognized by Crain’s Cleveland Business in its annual “40-Under-40” profile of young leaders. He also was named a NEO Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year® Award finalist in 2013.

x

Esq., General Counsel and EVP

Linda Erkkila

Linda Erkkila is the General Counsel and Executive Vice President for Safeguard Properties, with oversight of legal, human resources, training, and compliance. Linda’s broad scope of oversight covers regulatory issues that impact Safeguard’s operations, risk mitigation, strategic planning, human resources and training initiatives, compliance, insurance, litigation and claims management, and counsel related to mergers, acquisition and joint ventures.

Linda assures that Safeguard’s strategic initiatives align with its resources, leverage opportunities across the company, and contemplate compliance mandates. She has practiced law for 25 years and her experience, both as outside and in-house counsel, covers a wide range of corporate matters, including regulatory disclosure, corporate governance compliance, risk assessment, compensation and benefits, litigation management, and mergers and acquisitions.

Linda earned her JD at Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. She holds a degree in economics from Miami University and an MBA. Linda was previously named as both a “Woman of Influence” by HousingWire and as a “Leading Lady” by MReport.

x

COO

Michael Greenbaum

Michael Greenbaum is the Chief Operating Officer of Safeguard Properties, where he has played a pivotal role since joining the company in July 2010. Initially brought on as Vice President of REO, Mike’s exceptional leadership and strategic vision quickly propelled him to Vice President of Operations in 2013, and ultimately to COO in 2015. Over his 14-year tenure at Safeguard, Mike has been instrumental in driving change and fostering innovation within the Property Preservation sector, consistently delivering excellence and becoming a trusted partner to clients and investors.

A distinguished graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, Mike earned a degree in Quantitative Economics. Following his graduation, he served in the U.S. Army’s Ordnance Branch, where he specialized in supply chain management. Before his tenure at Safeguard, Mike honed his expertise by managing global supply chains for 13 years, leveraging his military and civilian experience to lead with precision and efficacy.

x

CFO

Joe Iafigliola

Joe Iafigliola is the Chief Financial Officer for Safeguard Properties. Joe is responsible for the Control, Quality Assurance, Business Development, Marketing, Accounting, and Information Security departments. At the core of his responsibilities is the drive to ensure that Safeguard’s focus remains rooted in Customer Service = Resolution. Through his executive leadership role, he actively supports SGPNOW.com, an on-demand service geared towards real estate and property management professionals as well as individual home owners in need of inspection and property preservation services. Joe is also an integral force behind Compliance Connections, a branch of Safeguard Properties that allows code enforcement professionals to report violations at properties that can then be addressed by the Safeguard vendor network. Compliance Connections also researches and shares vacant property ordinance information with Safeguard clients.

Joe has an MBA from The Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University, is a Certified Management Accountant (CMA), and holds a bachelor’s degree from The Ohio State University’s Honors Accounting program.

x

Business Development

Carrie Tackett

Business Development Safeguard Properties