CFPB Outlines Guiding Principles for the Future of Foreclosure Prevention

Investor Update
August 2, 2016

CFPB Outlines Consumer Protections as Government Foreclosure Relief Program Is Set to Expire

Washington, D.C. – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today outlined consumer protection principles to guide mortgage servicers, investors, government housing agencies, and policymakers as they develop new foreclosure relief solutions. The Bureau’s action comes as the Department of Treasury’s Home Affordable Modification Program, a foreclosure relief program put in place in response to the financial crisis, is nearing its expiration date. The CFPB’s proposed principles are meant to inform the discussion of potential options to help prevent avoidable foreclosures.

“We aim to help consumers avoid foreclosures, which upset their personal and financial lives,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “The modification program was put in place to provide alternatives to foreclosure. Our principles will serve as helpful guardrails for servicers, investors, and regulators to consider as we continue to protect consumers who are struggling to pay their mortgages.”

Mortgage servicers collect payments from the mortgage borrower and forward those payments to the owner of the loan, the investor. They handle customer service, collections, loan modifications, and foreclosures. Avoiding foreclosure is often in the best interests of both the investor and the consumer. Servicers may provide consumers with ways to prevent foreclosure, also known as “loss mitigation” options, such as forbearance, repayment plans, loan modification, and short sales.

During the financial crisis, the Department of Treasury created the temporary Home Affordable Modification Program to provide relief to families at risk of foreclosure. Consumers who could not make their mortgage payments have been able to seek changes through the program to reduce their monthly payment and prevent foreclosure. With the program expiring in January 2017, the industry is beginning to develop new foreclosure relief options appropriate for a post-crisis environment.

The CFPB principles announced today call for assistance to consumers facing foreclosure that is accessible, affordable, sustainable, and transparent. These principles span the spectrum of home-retention options such as forbearance, repayment plans and modifications, and home-disposition options such as short sales and deeds-in-lieu. In summary, the principles promote:

  • Accessibility: Consumers should easily be able to obtain and use information about loss mitigation options, and how to apply for those options.
  • Affordability: Repayment plans and mortgage loan modifications should generally be designed to produce a payment and loan structure that is affordable for consumers.
  • Sustainability: Loss mitigation options used for home retention should be designed to provide affordability throughout the remaining or extended loan term.
  • Transparency: Consumers should get clear, concise information about the decisions servicers make.

The Departments of Treasury and Housing and Urban Development and the Federal Housing Finance Agency have also issued a joint white paper on this topic that details lessons learned from the program, and core principles they deem necessary in future loss mitigation frameworks.

The principles announced today by the Bureau do not establish binding legal requirements but instead  are intended to complement ongoing discussions among industry, consumer groups, and policymakers. The CFPB believes these principles are flexible enough to apply to an array of approaches, and recognize the interests of consumers, investors, and servicers.

The Consumer Protection Principles are available at: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/20160802_CFPB_Principles_for_Future_of_Loss_Mitigation.pdf

Source: CFPB

CFPB Expands Foreclosure Protections

Investor Update
August 4, 2016

Updated Servicing Rule Provides Surviving Family Members and Other Homeowners with Same Protections as Original Borrowers

Washington, D.C. – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today finalized new measures to ensure that homeowners and struggling borrowers are treated fairly by mortgage servicers. The updated rule requires servicers to provide certain borrowers with foreclosure protections more than once over the life of the loan, clarifies borrower protections when the servicing of a loan is transferred, and provides important loan information to borrowers in bankruptcy. The changes also help ensure that surviving family members and others who inherit or receive property generally have the same protections under the CFPB’s mortgage servicing rules as the original borrower.

“The Consumer Bureau is committed to ensuring that homeowners and struggling borrowers are treated fairly by mortgage servicers and that no one is wrongly foreclosed upon,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “These updates to the rule will give greater protections to mortgage borrowers, particularly surviving family members and other successors in interest, who often are especially vulnerable.”

Mortgage servicers are responsible for collecting payments from the mortgage borrower and forwarding those payments to the owner of the loan. They typically handle customer service, collections, loan modifications, and foreclosures. To address widespread mortgage servicing problems, the CFPB established common-sense rules for servicers that went into effect on January 10, 2014.

The CFPB issued proposed amendments to those rules in November 2014, and the final rule issued today adopts many of the proposed provisions. However, the Bureau made a number of changes in the final rule after considering comments received from the public.

The rule issued today establishes new protections for consumers, including:

  • Requiring servicers to provide certain borrowers with foreclosure protections more than once over the life of the loan: Under the CFPB’s existing rules, a mortgage servicer must give borrowers certain foreclosure protections, including the right to be evaluated under the CFPB’s requirements for options to avoid foreclosure, only once during the life of the loan. Today’s final rule will require that servicers give those protections again for borrowers who have brought their loans current at any time since submitting the prior complete loss mitigation application. This change will be particularly helpful for borrowers who obtain a permanent loan modification and later suffer an unrelated hardship – such as the loss of a job or the death of a family member – that could otherwise cause them to face foreclosure.
  • Expanding consumer protections to surviving family members and other homeowners: If a borrower dies, existing CFPB rules require that servicers have policies and procedures in place to promptly identify and communicate with family members, heirs, or other parties, known as “successors in interest,” who have a legal interest in the home. Today’s final rule establishes a broad definition of successor in interest that generally includes persons who receive property upon the death of a relative or joint tenant; as a result of a divorce or legal separation; through certain trusts; or from a spouse or parent. The final rule ensures that those confirmed as successors in interest will generally receive the same protections under the CFPB’s mortgage servicing rules as the original borrower.
  • Providing more information to borrowers in bankruptcy: Under the CFPB’s existing mortgage rules, servicers do not have to provide periodic statements or early intervention loss mitigation information to borrowers in bankruptcy. Today’s final rule generally requires, subject to certain exemptions, that servicers provide those borrowers periodic statements with specific information tailored for bankruptcy, as well as a modified written early intervention notice to let those borrowers know about loss mitigation options. Servicers also currently do not have to provide early intervention loss mitigation information to borrowers who have told the servicer to stop contacting them under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Today’s final rule generally requires servicers to provide modified written early intervention notices to let those borrowers also know about loss mitigation options.
  • Requiring servicers to notify borrowers when loss mitigation applications are complete: Whether a borrower is entitled to key foreclosure protections depends in part on the date a borrower completes a loss mitigation application. If consumers do not know the status of their application, they cannot know the status of those foreclosure protections. Today’s final rule requires servicers to notify borrowers promptly and in writing that the application is complete, so that borrowers know the status of the application and have more information about their protections.
  • Protecting struggling borrowers during servicing transfers: When mortgages are transferred from one servicer to another, borrowers who had applied to the prior servicer for loss mitigation may not know where they stand with the new servicer. Today’s final rule clarifies that generally the new servicer must comply with the loss mitigation requirements within the same timeframes that applied to the transferor servicer, but provides limited extensions to these timeframes under certain circumstances. If a borrower submits an application shortly before transfer, the new servicer must send an acknowledgment notice within 10 business days of the transfer date. If the borrower’s application was complete prior to transfer, the new servicer must evaluate it within 30 days of the transfer date. If the new servicer needs more information to evaluate the application, the borrower would retain some foreclosure protections in the meantime. If the borrower submits an appeal, the new servicer has 30 days to make a determination on the appeal.
  • Clarifying servicers’ obligations to avoid dual-tracking and prevent wrongful foreclosures: The CFPB’s existing rules prohibit servicers from taking certain actions in foreclosure once they receive a complete loss mitigation application from a borrower more than 37 days prior to a scheduled sale. However, in some cases, borrowers are not receiving this protection, and servicers’ foreclosure counsel may not be taking adequate steps to delay foreclosure proceedings or sales. The CFPB’s new rule clarifies that, if a servicer has already made the first foreclosure notice or filing and receives a timely complete application, servicers and their foreclosure counsel must not move for a foreclosure judgment or order of sale, or conduct a foreclosure sale, even if a third party conducts the sale proceedings, unless the borrower’s loss mitigation application is properly denied, withdrawn, or the borrower fails to perform on a loss mitigation agreement. The clarifications will aid servicers in complying with, and assist courts in applying, the dual-tracking prohibitions in foreclosure proceedings to prevent wrongful foreclosures.
  • Clarifying when a borrower becomes delinquent: Several of the consumer protections under the CFPB’s existing rules depend upon how long a consumer has been delinquent on a mortgage. Today’s final rule clarifies that delinquency, for purposes of the servicing rules, begins on the date a borrower’s periodic payment becomes due and unpaid. When a borrower misses a periodic payment but later makes it up, if the servicer applies that payment to the oldest outstanding periodic payment, the date the borrower’s delinquency began advances. The final rule also allows servicers the discretion, under certain circumstances, to consider a borrower as having made a timely payment even if the borrower’s payment falls short of a full periodic payment. The increased clarity will help ensure borrowers are treated uniformly and fairly.

Today’s final rule makes additional changes to the CFPB’s mortgage servicing rules. These changes include providing flexibility for servicers to comply with certain force-placed insurance and periodic statement disclosure requirements. The changes also clarify several requirements regarding early intervention, loss mitigation, information requests, and prompt crediting of payments, as well as the small servicer exemption. Further, the changes exempt servicers from providing periodic statements under certain circumstances when the servicer has charged off the mortgage. Finally, concurrently with the final rule, the CFPB is issuing an interpretive rule under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act relating to servicers’ compliance with certain mortgage servicing provisions as amended by the final rule.

Most of the provisions of the final rule will take effect 12 months after publication in the Federal Register. The provisions relating to successors in interest and the provisions relating to periodic statements for borrowers in bankruptcy will take effect 18 months after publication in the Federal Register.

View final rule

View interpretive final rule

Sourc: CFPB

CFPB Announces New Advisory Board And Council Members

Investor Update
August 19, 2016

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced the appointment of new consumer experts from outside the federal government to the Consumer Advisory Board, Community Bank Advisory Council, Credit Union Advisory Council, and Academic Research Council. The four bodies provide advice to CFPB leadership on a broad range of consumer financial issues and emerging market trends.

“The Bureau’s advisory board and councils play an important role in making sure that the Bureau is taking into account the wide variety of perspectives and views in the consumer financial marketplace,” said CFPB Director Cordray. “The new additions being announced today bring experience and knowledge that will help inform the CFPB’s work going forward.”

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act charges the CFPB with establishing a Consumer Advisory Board to advise and consult with the Bureau’s Director on a variety of consumer financial issues. At the behest of the Director, the Bureau also created a Community Bank Advisory Council, a Credit Union Advisory Council and an Academic Research Council. The Community Bank and Credit Union Advisory Councils advise and consult with the Bureau on consumer financial issues related to community banks and credit unions. The Academic Research Council shares insight relating to research methodologies, data collection, and analytic strategies. In January 2016, the CFPB issued a Federal Register Notice outlining the responsibilities of the advisory groups, as well as the duties of its members, and solicited applications for appointment.

The newly appointed advisory group members include experts in consumer protection, financial services, community development, fair lending, civil rights, consumer financial products or services, representatives of community banks and credit unions, and scholars with relevant methodological and subject matter experience. The expertise and institutional-size diversity among advisory group members reflects the range of issues under the Bureau’s jurisdiction as well as the racial, ethnic and geographic diversity of U.S. consumers. New members to the Consumer Advisory Board and Academic Research Council will serve three-year terms and new members to the Community Bank and Credit Union Advisory Councils will serve two-year terms.

Consumer Advisory Board Members:

  • Lynn Drysdale, Managing Attorney, Consumer Law Unit, Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, Inc., Jacksonville, Fla.
  • Paulina Gonzalez, Executive Director, California Reinvestment Coalition, San Francisco, Calif.
  • William Howle, Head of U.S. Retail Bank, Citibank, New York, N.Y.
  • Ruhi Maker, Senior Attorney, Empire Justice Center, Rochester, N.Y.
  • Arjan Schutte, Founder and Managing Partner, Core Innovation Capital, Los Angeles, Calif.
  • Lisa Servon, Professor, The New School, New York University, New York, N.Y.
  • Raul Vazquez, Chief Executive Officer, Oportun, Redwood City, Calif.
  • James M. Wehmann, Executive Vice President, Scores for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO), Roseville, Minn.
  • Chi Chi Wu, Staff Attorney, National Consumer Law Center, Boston, Mass.

Community Bank Advisory Council Members:

  • Melissa A. Ballard, Vice President and Director, First Iowa State Bank, Albia, Iowa
  • Menzo D. Case, President and Chief Executive Officer, Generations Bank, Seneca Falls, N.Y.
  • Linda Feighery, Vice President and Community Reinvestment Act /Fair Lending Officer for Citywide Banks, Denver, Colo.
  • Brenda K. Hughes, Senior Vice President and Director of Mortgage and Retail Lending, First Federal Savings Bank of Twin Falls, Twin Falls, Idaho
  • Dion Kidd Johnson, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Risk Officer, Western Bank, Alamogordo, N.M.
  • Cal Ratcliff, Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer, Bank of North Carolina, High Point, N.C.
  • Trent Sorbe, President, Central Payments Division, Central Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, Mo.

Credit Union Advisory Council Members:

  • Faith Lleva Anderson, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, American  Airlines Federal Credit Union, Fort Worth, Texas
  • Daniel Berry, Chief Executive Officer, Duke University Federal Credit Union, Durham, N.C.
  • Patrick F. Harrigan, Chief Risk Officer and General Counsel, Service Credit Union, Portsmouth, N.H.
  • Ricardo Ledezma, Corporate Compliance Assurance Manager, San Antonio Federal Credit Union, San Antonio, Texas
  • Sarah Marshall, Chief Executive Officer, North Side Community Federal Credit Union, Chicago, Ill.
  • Dayatra T. Matthews, Senior Vice President of Legal & Compliance, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Raleigh, N.C.
  • Amy Nelson, Chief Executive Officer, Point West Credit Union, Portland, Ore.
  • Raynor Zillgitt, Vice President Risk Management and General Counsel, Lake Trust Credit Union, Brighton, Mich.

Academic Research Council Members:

  • Ian Ayres, William K. Townsend Professor, Yale Law School, New Haven, Conn.
  • Brigitte Madrian, Professor, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

More information on the Bureau’s advisory groups can be found here: http://www.consumerfinance.gov/advisory-groups/

Source: CFPB

VALERI Servicer Special Announcement

Investor Update
July 1, 2016

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Manual 26-4, Servicer Handbook

NEW VA POLICY – Streamline Modification – Chapter 5 has been updated with the new VA Streamline guidance and will be effective September 1, 2016.

UPDATES

Revisions to Chapter 4, 5, 14 and Appendix G are reflected in the Transmittal sheet dated May, 31, 2016, and have been posted in M26-4. They can be accessed at http://www.benefits.va.gov/WARMS/M26_4.asp.

Source: VA

VA Servicer Handbook M26-4 Property Preservation Requirements and Fees Update

Investor Update
July 14, 2016

   3.  Boarding.  The boarding of windows and doors should only be done in those geographic areas where previous experience has shown vandalism and/or theft to be an ongoing problem, where local ordinances require boarding, if windows are broken, or where special conditions exist that make it necessary.  Reimbursement for boarding expenses is provided on a “per opening” basis, up to the maximum allowable amount.  For those properties where it has been determined by the loan servicer that boarding is necessary and required, the itemized invoice of work completed and materials used must include the amount paid per window or door.  The following requirements should be followed: 

(a)  Windows.  Secured with 1/2″ plywood or polycarbonate/clearboard.

(b)  Doors.  Secured with 5/8″ plywood or polycarbonate/clearboard.

(c)  Other Openings.  French doors and sliding door openings should be secured with 3/4″ plywood or polycarbonate/clearboard.

Source: VA (Servicer Handbook M26-4, Appendix H: Property Preservation Requirements and Fees full version)

VA Circular 26-15-16 Change 1 Auction Service for the Termination of VA Loans

Investor Update
July 14, 2016

1. Purpose. The purpose of this Circular is to extend the rescission date of the basic Circular to reflect that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) continues to authorize mortgage servicers and holders to employ an auction service in lieu of completing a traditional foreclosure sale, where feasible.

2. Therefore, Circular 26-15-16 is changed as follows:

Page 2, paragraph 8: Delete “July 1, 2016.” and insert “July 1, 2018.”

By Direction of the Under Secretary for Benefits

Jeffrey F. London
Deputy Director, Loan Guaranty Service

Source: VA

Additional Resource:
Circular 26-15-16 (original version)

USDA’s Rural Housing Service Releases Housing Data and User-Friendly Tool

Investor Update
July 26, 2016

On July 21, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Rural Housing Service (RHS) released data on the agency’s single-family, multifamily, and community facilities programs. RHS also demonstrated how the data can be accessed via a new interactive visualization tool, created by PolicyMap, designed to make the data publicly attainable and more useful.

Tony Hernandez, Administrator of RHS, and David Lipsetz, Associate Administrator of RHS, explained how the data and PolicyMap’s interactive tool will provide RHS with valuable information and allow it to invest in its rural housing programs more effectively. They also said the data tool will enable RHS to provide accurate, reliable reports on rural housing programs and allow the public to access RHS program information in an unprecedented way.

PolicyMap’s Data and Product Development’s Vice President, Elizabeth Nash, highlighted the user-friendly tool and its previous uses in other projects. She conducted demonstrations on how to use the tool, showcasing how simple and effective it is at displaying complex data.

To download RHS’ newly available data, please click here. To access the public version of PolicyMap’s data tool, please click here.

Source: NCSHA

OCC Appoints Deputy Comptroller for Compliance Supervision

Investor Update
July 6, 2016

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) appointed Beverly F. Cole as the Deputy Comptroller for the Compliance Supervision, where she will report to the Senior Deputy Comptroller for Compliance and Community Affairs.

In this role, Cole will serve as the operational executive responsible for developing and promulgating compliance operational protocols, examination strategies, and schedules. She will also oversee a staff implementing bank supervision policy for compliance and establish programs to ensure efficient bank supervision for compliance. Cole will take on these duties starting July 2016 as announced by the OCC.

A native of Mississippi, Cole received her bachelor of arts degree in economics with an emphasis in business administration from Tougaloo College before beginning her career with the OCC in 1979 as an Assistant National Bank Examiner in Little Rock, Arkansas. In 1989 she was commissioned a National Bank Examiner. During her career, Cole served in a variety of supervision roles including Credit Specialist in the former Southeastern District, Credit Team Leads, and Assistant Deputy Comptroller for Specialties and Operations in the Northeastern District Office.

Prior to this position, Cole served as the Senior Advisor to the Senior Deputy Comptroller for Midsize and Community Bank Supervision. In this role, she provided advice on the implementation of policies and procedures relevant to the effective and efficient supervision of national banks and federal savings associations.  In addition to her current position, Cole is also the Designated Federal Official for the OCC’s Minority Depository Institutions Advisory Committee.

According to Comptroller of the Currency Thomas J. Curry, “Beverly has dedicated her career to bank supervision. She is committed to ensuring national banks and federal savings associations comply with applicable laws and regulation and she understands that compliance goes hand-in-hand with safety and soundness as well as banks’ ability to provide equal access and fair treatment to their customers.”

Source: DS News

More Modifications Focusing on Sustainability

Investor Update
July 5, 2016

More mortgage modifications are focusing on the sustainability of a loan in addition to focusing on affordability, according to a recent report from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

The OCC’s Q1 Mortgage Metrics report found that out of the 34,481 modifications completed by the seven largest banks during Q1 (Bank of America, Citibank, HSBC, JPMorgan Chase, PNC, U.S. Bank, and Wells Fargo), 91 percent of them were of the “combination modification” variety. Combination modifications include multiple actions that affect both the affordability and sustainability of a mortgage loan. Actions that may affect sustainability may include interest rate reduction and term extension, according to the OCC.

The servicers completed an additional 2,681 modifications that received only a single action, the OCC reported.

The total number of combination modifications during the first quarter came to 31, 450; out of those, 93 percent of them included capitalization or delinquent interest fees, according to OCC. Approximately 81 percent included an interest rate reduction or freeze while 88 percent featured a term extension. Finally, 8 percent of combination modifications included some amount of principal reduction, while 13 percent of them had some amount of principal deferred, according to OCC.

Out of the total number of loan modifications completed during Q1, about 80 percent of them (30,028) reduced the pre-modification monthly payment of the loan. Servicers also reported that about 6,058 modifications that were completed during the third quarter of 2015 (which were at least six months old as of March 31, 2016) were either 60 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure.

Overall, the 58,921 new foreclosures initiated by servicers in Q1 was a 29 percent decline from a year earlier, and the percentage of mortgages that were current and performing rose from 94.2 percent at the end of Q1 2015 up to 94.9 percent at the end of Q1 2016, according to the OCC. The report covered approximately 21.1 million first-lien mortgage loans with $3.6 trillion in unpaid principal balances, and covered about 38 percent of all outstanding first-lien residential mortgage debt in the U.S.

Source: DS News