Get ready: Regulators are Looking Hard at Cybersecurity of Third-Party Vendors

Industry Update
February 20, 2016

What’s voluntary today is going to be required tomorrow

As mortgage lenders and servicers try to shore up their own systems against data security breaches, a new regulatory focus on the security practices of third-party vendors could be even more daunting.
 
A panel at the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Mortgage Servicing conference examined the data security threats servicers need to address, and one glaring area of weakness was these vendor relationships. Specifically, the panel pointed to the guidelines from the New York Department of Financial Services on this issue that are voluntary now, but are likely — even highly likely — to be required in the near future.

“We talk to regulators every day and they have made very clear that they are looking at the security of these vendors,” said Richard Hill, vice president of industry technology at the MBA and moderator of the panel.
 
Indeed, the NYDFS caused ripples of anxiety last April when they made it known that one in three banks don’t even require their vendors to notify them of data security breaches, opening a potential “back door” into the banks’ systems. The report revealed the dirty secret that has been keeping executives up at night for years — many lenders have no effective system in place to monitor their vendors’ cybersecurity, nor any idea how to even start.
 
The panel’s discussion acknowledged the complexity of monitoring vendors at such a micro level when many servicers (and one assumes, lenders) have multiple vendors covering various systems. Even those who are implementing programs with new vendors have to contend with a host of legacy vendors that may or may not still be connected to their systems.
 
The NYDFS has taken on this issue, issuing a proposal in November 2015 that outlines steps for an effective cybersecurity framework. From that proposal:
 
Second, third-party service providers often have access to sensitive data and to a financial institution’s information technology systems, providing a potential point of entry for hackers. A company may have the most sophisticated cyber security protections in the industry, but if its third-party service providers have weak systems or controls, those protections will be ineffective. Finally, the scale and breadth of the most recent breaches and incidents demonstrate that cyber security is a global concern that affects every industry at all levels.

There is a demonstrated need for robust regulatory action in the cyber security space, and the Department is now considering a new cyber security regulation for financial institutions.
 
The MBA panel encouraged servicers to pay very close attention to these “guidelines,” which clearly lay the foundation for future regulation. Among the recommendations are a requirement to develop policies and procedures that address 12 areas, including vendor and third-party management. Within that area, the NYDFS outlines six specifics:
 
The policies and procedures would be required to include internal requirements for minimum preferred terms to be included in contracts with third-party service providers, including provisions requiring:

  1. the use of multi-factor authentication to limit access to sensitive data and systems;
  2. the use of encryption to protect sensitive data in transit and at rest;
  3. notice to be provided in the event of a cyber security incident;
  4. the indemnification of the entity in the event of a cyber security incident that results in loss;
  5. the ability of the entity or its agents to perform cyber security audits of the third party vendor; and
  6. representations and warranties by the third-party vendors concerning information security.

The guidelines also call for every financial company to designate a chief information security officer who would be required to submit annual reports to the NYDFS, and for companies to conduct annual penetration testing and quarterly vulnerability assessments.
 
It’s not hard to see why servicers and lenders should pay attention to these sweeping “guidelines.” The experts on the MBA panel urged servicers to do something — anything — to address these issues and offered several concrete ways to get started. The panel also warned that these types of checklist guidelines, while helping to keep servicers compliant, shouldn’t be confused for an actual cybersecurity plan.
 
The members of the panel, which included Thomas Clerici, information security officer at Freedom Mortgage, Joseph Dombrowski, director, product manager and chief mortgage strategist at Fiserv, and Kevin Hayes, senior principal at the Promontory Financial Group, acknowledged that security breaches are more a matter of when, not if, and emphasized that the steps servicers take to follow these vendor guidelines before a breach could be a significant factor as regulatory bodies judge their safety.

Source: HousingWire

Flint’s Problems Didn’t Start with Water

Industry Update
February 13, 2016

A third of the property in the city of Flint is vacant.

That’s according to the Genesee County Land Bank, the organization charged with pushing back against the encroaching wave of blight that touches nearly every neighborhood in this struggling city — of 56,000 parcels in Flint, about 20,000 are empty or blighted.

And it’s going to get worse.

How much worse, no one can say. But there’s little doubt in the minds of Doug Weiland, executive director of the land bank, and Genesee County Treasurer Deb Cherry, that because of Flint’s ongoing water crisis, more people will stop paying their property taxes in the years ahead.

“It’s hard to know the impact, because we’ve never been through anything like this,” Cherry said.

In the long-term, it likely means more homes will be foreclosed, and almost certainly become vacant or blighted. In the short-term, the city will lose revenue, leaving Flint with less money to pay for police officers and firefighters, for garbage pickup and schools — or for repairs to or investment in its infrastructure, like the water system.

Flint’s water crisis exacerbates a cycle that has been taking place for decades in cities across Michigan: places like Flint or Detroit or Saginaw or Benton Harbor.

In Flint, it’s linked to the city’s economic travails — the departure of General Motors dealt a devastating blow to the city from which it has not recovered. And now, to its water, still not safe to drink, nearly five months after the State of Michigan admitted that the city’s water supply had been compromised.

People leave, thus tax revenue drops. The city has less money with which to provide basic services, so more folks move out — meaning there’s even less money. So more people leave.

Flint spent four years under a succession of state-appointed emergency managers, brought in to balance the city’s budget — along the way, endorsing or making a series of disastrous decisions that left the city’s water undrinkable.

Nor was the emergency managers’ basic charge — balancing the budget — successful. In the last fiscal year, the city’s deficit was about $7 million.

Even after Flint’s water is safe to drink, the city’s long-term problems, those made worse by the crisis, will remain. And that’s a reality neither Gov. Rick Snyder nor the Michigan Legislature have begun to publicly entertain.

“What kind of increase (in foreclosures) that will correlate to, I don’t know, but I would guess that it’s going to be pretty significant,” said Alex Alsup, chief product officer at Detroit-based data firm Loveland Technologies, which has worked extensively to chronicle Detroit’s blight and cycle of foreclosures. “The thing that needs to happen is, if the state is thinking about water bill reductions or paying off water bills, they need to be thinking about property taxes the same way.”

Facing the crisis

For nearly two years, water contaminated by coliform bacteria, a hodgepodge of ill-chosen chemicals, and finally, lead, has flowed through Flint’s pipes, into homes and businesses, exposing the nearly 100,000 residents of this town to terrible health risks. Slow to acknowledge the problem, and glacial in response once it had, the State of Michigan has finally begun to treat Flint’s water crisis as the public health catastrophe that it is.

Snyder’s budget proposal, released last week, envisions $195 million plowed into the city for emergency relief, infrastructure repair, services for children, who are most vulnerable to the serious, lifelong effects of lead poisoning, and $30 million for residents’ water bills — about half what Flint Mayor Karen Weaver says is required to keep the system intact.

All of this, and more, is necessary.

But none of it addresses the problem of Flint’s value, or the city’s long fight against blight.

Last year, Flint collected about $19 million in property taxes; that’s about 23% of the city’s $81-million general fund budget. The taxable value of all property in the city is about $750 million, according to the land bank. Collections have declined since 2004, when about 89% of Flint residents paid their property taxes promptly, the Free Press reported earlier this month. Now, it’s about 64%. And even after five years of emergency management, the city’s running a deficit — about $7 million last year.

Before the water crisis, Flint’s rate of foreclosure had stabilized, Cherry said, hitting consistent numbers each year. That was progress.

The land bank’s Weiland says the city’s high rate of poverty means some residents can’t afford to relocate. But even if folks don’t walk away, the prospect of reduced property assessments — granted when the value of a property is negatively impacted (by something like undrinkable water) — means tax revenue would shrink. Appraisers and real estate attorneys told the Free Press earlier this month that it is inevitable that many such assessment reductions would be requested, and granted.

Foreclosure law issues

Michigan’s foreclosure law, updated in 1999, shortens the span of time between a property’s first tax delinquency and foreclosure, and allows county treasurers some leeway in exercising foreclosure. If a city can’t collect property taxes, the delinquent bill is sent to the county, which attempts to collect for two years. At the third year, the property is foreclosed on, and put up for sale in the county’s tax auction. The whole idea is to get property into the hands of folks who’ll pay the taxes.

In places like Flint, it doesn’t work.

About 2,500 properties in Genesee County were put up for sale in last year’s tax foreclosure auction — including about 1,700 properties in Flint. Just 271 properties in the county-wide inventory were sold; 2,112 were transferred to the land bank. The land bank’s job is to keep such properties well-maintained, and out of the hands of speculators, preparing for the day when those parcels will again have value.

“The abandoned property we have, there’s very little market,” Weiland said. “I expect we’re going to be holding these properties for a long time” — but, he says, the land bank is still doing business, even after the water crisis.

Yet a land bank is palliative care, a way to deal with the problem of blight and abandonment after it has been created.

“As we’ve seen in Detroit, there are a lot of conditions and symptoms that are damaging to the city and its people, but it’s really the property taxes and this super-efficient foreclosure law that seems to have the greatest impact in displacing people from their property. It’s perpetuating cycles, expansion of vacancy and blight, so I would expect that if there’s not any kind of intervention, that’s going to be a pretty serious problem for the city,” Alsup says. “The whole country’s built on real estate values, property taxes and (losing that is) really what is toxic to the organism of the city.”

Cherry is near-militant about Flint’s plight. When the city hands its tax-delinquent properties to the county later this year, Cherry says, she’ll refuse to foreclose on homes considered tax-delinquent because of unpaid water bills attached as liens to property taxes.

“My attorney says I have the right to do that because they’re fraudulent water bills,” she said. “Unless something changes, that’s what our plan is.”

And it’s difficult to imagine any local or state official leading the charge to force Cherry to foreclose on homeowners with undrinkable water. And she says her office is often able to work with property owners to avoid foreclosures.

But again, Cherry’s best efforts can only stanch the bleeding.

The state’s response thus far to the Flint crisis has focused on the water. That’s important. But we’re just beginning to understand the span and depth of its reverberations — and what must be done to mitigate the harm.

Source: Detroit Free Press

‘Flare-Ups’ of Bad Loans Still a Risk to Mortgage Servicers

Industry Update
February 18, 2016

Foreclosures and repossessions have subsided from the overwhelming levels of the housing bust, but mortgage servicers cannot afford to grow complacent about the volume of real estate owned.

“I don’t think we will have any out-of-control fires as far as REO. But we’re going to have some flare-ups and we need to be prepared for those flare-ups,” said Roger Beane, the chief executive of LRES, an appraisal and REO asset management company.

During an interview at the Mortgage Bankers Association servicing conference in Orlando this week, Beane pointed to a trend that started in the 1960s: Every 10 years or so there has been a sudden outbreak of loan defaults. That was the case in 1998 and in 2008, in both instances largely due to the nonprime market.

But since the 2008 bust took so long to work through, Beane said he believes that it will take longer than the 10-year time frame to see the next large increase in defaults.

“We’re just normalizing now,” he said, so he doesn’t expect a 2018 REO correction.

His caveat to that prediction is the 2016 presidential election and how it might influence the markets. “What are interest rates going to do? What is that going to do to borrowing power?” he asked rhetorically, pointing out that rising rates reduce purchasing power, which then reduces home prices and in turn homeowner equity. Defaults happen when borrowers can’t refinance to pull equity out to help with transient financial problems.

A group that assists distressed borrowers, the Homeownership Preservation Foundation is expecting to be plenty busy dealing with troubled consumers in 2016.

The group is projecting it will receive nearly 400,000 telephone calls and conduct close to 100,000 counseling sessions this year, chief financial officer Ken Duncan said during a panel presentation on communicating with troubled borrowers.

Beane said the large variance in foreclosure case volume between nonjudicial states and judicial states has disappeared. This has given loan servicers an opportunity to right-size their REO staffing, he said, adding that they need to consider outsourcing (a service LRES offers).

Source: National Mortgage News

Five Star?s Delgado Asks Castro to Address Vacant and Abandoned Properties Issue

Industry Update
February 17, 2016

Five Star Institute President and CEO Ed Delgado recently met with HUD Secretary Julián Castro to ask the Secretary to consider issuing a mortgagee letter to set the definition and criteria for identifying vacant and abandoned properties and then accelerating those properties to foreclosure.

The problem of so-called “zombie properties,” or those that have been vacated but have not completed the foreclosure process, has become an “issue of national concern,” according to Delgado. About 37 percent of foreclosures nationwide are vacant and abandoned properties, according to Five Star.

When these properties stay vacant for an extended period of time—as long as two or three years or more in some cases—they can potentially have devastating effect on their surrounding communities because they not only lead to lower property values, but they often become magnets for vandalism, squatting, and violent crime. In their recent meeting, Delgado asked Castro to consider opening up a dialogue with the servicing industry to talk about vacant and abandoned properties.

“I have a decent perspective on what you’re talking about, because I used to be a city councilman and then the mayor (of San Antonio),” Castro told Delgado. “So we saw it not just from an individual perspective, but from the perspective that concerns neighborhood associations and community associations and folks that have to deal with the impact of vacant houses on their block, and what it does to everyone and not just the individual.”

Castro said of the proposal, “Send it our way, and we’ll make sure it gets to my desk. I’d love to take a look at it.”

Trying to foster a dialogue on vacant and abandoned properties has been a project of Delgado’s and many leaders in the mortgage servicing industry for four years. In November 2015, Delgado delivered opening remarks and moderated two panels—one on transforming blighted communities—at the National Property Preservation Conference (NPPC) in Washington, D.C. In his opening remarks at the NPPC, Delgado called for national solutions for what the vacant and abandoned properties issue and praised Ohio State Bill H.B. 134, a “fast-track foreclosure bill” aimed at expediting the foreclosure process, which had passed in the Ohio State House of Representatives by a unanimous vote earlier in November. Delgado called Ohio State Bill H.B. 134 “an important template towards the introduction of a national course of solution for vacant and abandoned properties.”

The Ohio fast-track foreclosure bill has become a template for several other states to use when drafting similar legislation. The bill, which in its second incarnation after a similar bill failed to pass in 2014, is currently awaiting a vote in the Ohio Senate.

“We are very hopeful,” said Ohio State Rep. Cheryl Grossman, the bill’s co-sponsor. “The discussions are ongoing and we hope to see some action soon.”

Editor’s note: The Five Star Institute is the parent company of DS News and DSNews.com.

Source: DS News

Additional Resource:
Safeguard Properties Fast-Track Legislation Resource Center

Evansville’s Blight Elimination Program Could be Revived

Updated 7/25/16: TristateHomepage.com released an article titled City Council Approves Evansville Land Bank Corp.

Link to article

Updated 6/8/16: WAVE NBC 3 released a report titled Vanderburgh Co land bank approved unanimously.

Link to article

Updated 5/9/16: The Evansville Courier & Press published an article titled Evansville OKs land bank, for a year.

Link to article

Land Bank Update
February 1, 2016

EVANSVILLE, IN (WFIE) – Talks are under way to restart Evansville’s Blight Elimination Program.

[PREVIOUS: Funding for the Blight Elimination program greatly reduced]

Kellie Coures of the Department of Metropolitan Development says that he has asked the mayor to consider using the Brownfield Corporation as the city’s official land bank, which would restore the money that the city council originally took from the program.

Coures says that a blighted home in a neighborhood has a ripple effect, lowering the property value of every house around it.

His plan is to lift rundown properties from the ground, so a developer can rebuild a new property in its place.

Source: WAVE NBC 3 (WFIE Evansville)

Court Finds in Favor of MERS

Industry Update
February 8, 2016

The string of legal victories for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) continued on Monday with the announcement from parent company MERSCORP Holdings that a court in Dallas, Texas, had ruled in MERS’ favor recognizing the company’s right as beneficiary to notice of a lawsuit under both the U.S. and Texas Constitutions.

In the case of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Summit Residential Services, Summit Residential Services acquired an interest in a property following an HOA foreclosure sale, and in 2002, the property was encumbered by a deed of trust granted by the borrower to MERS. Summit filed suit seeking clear title to the property, and in the suit it named only the original lender identified in the MERS deed of trust.

MERS was not provided with notice of the action, nor was it named in the action. Summary judgment was granted to Summit which extinguished the MERS lien in April 2014, and MERS promptly filed its own lawsuit seeking to reinstate its lien. In its suit, MERS contended that it could not be deprived of its protected property without an opportunity to be heard under due process guaranteed by both the U.S. and Texas Constitutions.

The Dallas County District Court, 101st Judicial District, agreed with MERS and entered a Final Judgment vacating Summit’s judgment and reinstating MERS’ lien on the property.

“This judgment confirms that MERS is a necessary party to any lawsuit affecting property interests when MERS is the mortgagee or beneficiary of record. As such, MERS has a constitutionally protected right entitling MERS to notice of the lawsuit,” said MERSCORP Holdings VP for Corporate Communications, Janis Smith. “MERS will vigorously defend its constitutional and statutory right to notice.”

MERS won a number of court decisions just since the second half of 2015 in cases that challenged its right to act as mortgagee. In late September, MERS won decisions in Montana, Georgia, New York, Kentucky, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and Texas. In January, MERS won its first decision of 2016 in the New Hampshire State Supreme Court.

Source: DS News

City Targeting Vacant Buildings for Demolition to Reduce Crime

Industry Update
February 23, 2016

CHICAGO (CBS) — Building better communities by tearing down troubled structures; that’s the new goal of the Chicago Department of Buildings, and their plan was set to begin Tuesday morning.

Tuesday morning, city crews tore down a vacant house at 236 W. 113th St.

The home had been vacant for years, and officials said it had become a magnet for criminal activity. It was one of 900 vacant homes slated for demolition in high-crime neighborhoods. Most will be concentrated in four police districts – Calumet, Englewood, Deering, and Harrison.

“We’re going to start over in the Roseland area, and then we plan on expanding it to different locations throughout the city, because this is just one of the tools in our toolbox that we’re going to utilize to make the city safer,” Chicago Police Chief of Patrol Eddie Johnson said.

Officials said they are fast-tracking the demolition process for those buildings, in order to get rid of gathering places for gangs, drug users, and other criminals.

“These vacant buildings, we know that they are targets for gangs to gather and commit nefarious activity, such as storing weapons or selling illegal drugs,” Johnson said.

Ald. Carrie Austin (34th), whose ward includes part of the Roseland neighborhood, said demolishing long vacant buildings will help rid the area of blight.

“We can rid our community of drug-infested buildings, prostitution, and every illegal activity that could possibly be in a community. This effort will strengthen this community once and again,” she said.

In addition to tearing down many vacant buildings, the city also will board up hundreds more. Last year, the city boarded up about 3,000 vacant structures; so far this year, 425 have been boarded up. Also, some businesses where serious crimes have happened might also be closed on a case-by-case basis.

It’s not just about tearing down and boarding up vacant buildings; it’s also about building up communities. As part of that, the city’s Large Lot Program was ramping up.

The initiative allows residents to buy city-owned land for just $1 per parcel, if they already own property on the same block.

Chicago Buildings Commissioner Judy Frydland said the owner of a daycare center on the 200 block of West 113th Street wants to buy one of the lots that now has a vacant building, so she can expand the daycare.

“The owner wants to acquire the lot so that she can have a garden for her children that go there, and maybe extra parking, or whatever she needs to enhance her daycare center. She’ll be able to use the property for that, instead of a place for gangbangers to hang out,” she said.

Under the Large Lot Program, buyers must pay property taxes on the land, maintain the property, and keep it for five years before they sell. They can use the program to expand an existing yard, build a garden, or even add homes and apartment buildings within existing residential zoning limits. The land cannot be used to put up a new business.

Source: CBS Chicago

Additional Resource:

MapAlert Disaster Viewer:

Chicago Police District 11 (Harrison)
Chicago Police District 9 (Deering)
Chicago Police District 7 (Englewood)
Chicago Police District 5 (Calumet/Roseland)

Bill Would Allow for Land Bank Establishment in Virginia

Land Bank Update
February 11, 2016

SUMMARY AS INTRODUCED:

Land Bank Entities Act. Authorizes the establishment of a land bank entity by any locality or two or more localities combined to assist in addressing vacant, abandoned, and tax-delinquent real properties. Under the bill, after a referendum has been held on the question of creating a land bank entity, the locality has the option of (i) creating an authority or a nonprofit, nonstock corporation or (ii) designating an existing nonprofit entity that is exempt from taxation under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and eligible to receive donations from a locality pursuant to § 15.2-953 to carry out the functions of such land entity. The bill provides that land bank entities may acquire real property within participating localities or receive transfers and conveyances from the participating localities. Land bank entities are authorized to receive funding through grants and loans from participating localities, the Commonwealth, the federal government, and other public and private sources. In addition, the bill authorizes a locality to deem paid in full all accumulated taxes, penalties, interest, and other costs on any tax-delinquent property in exchange for conveyance of the property by the owner to a land bank entity. The bill also authorizes a participating locality to remit to the land bank entity up to 50 percent of the real property taxes collected on real property conveyed by a land bank entity for up to 10 years after the conveyance. This bill is a recommendation of the Virginia Housing Commission.

Source: Virginia General Assembly (HB 268 full text)

Bill Introduced to Protect California Widows, Widowers Against Foreclosure

Updated 9/29/16: The Los Angeles Times published an article discussing the signing of CA SB 1150 by Governor Jerry Brown.

Link to article

Updated 9/1/16: CA SB 1150 has been enrolled and presented to Governor Jerry Brown.

Link to bill information

Updated 8/23/16: DS News published an article titled Homeowner Survivor Bill of Rights Approved by Assembly.

Link to article

Updated 6/2/16: National Mortgage News published an article titled California Senate Approves Bill to Expand Rights of Widowed Spouses.

Link to article

Updated 5/3/16: CA SB 1150 has passed the Senate Judiciary.

Link to Senate Judiciary Analysis

Additional Resources:
Los Angeles Times (Bill to help widows stave off foreclosure passes state Senate committee)

Los Angeles Times (Why more widowed homeowners are struggling to prevent a foreclosure)

Updated 4/20/16: HousingWire published an article titled California AG backs expansion of Homeowner’s Bill of Rights.

Link to article

Legislation Update
February 26, 2016

A new bill introduced by state Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, would provide protections to widows and widowers who want to stay in their home, the senators office said Thursday.

The bill provides protections against foreclosure that are available to other homeowners but not to spouses and children of deceased kin.

Survivors who are not on the loan are not covered by California’s Homeowner Bill of Rights, lenders argue, the senator’s office said.

The HBOR requires survivors have a single point of contact at a mortgage lender and keeps lenders from foreclosing on a home when homeowners are seeking a loan modification.

Survivors have reported that lenders refuse to talk to them or lenders refuse to provide the facts about the loan and foreclosure avoidance options.

“We have an uneven playing field,” Associate Director of the California Reinvestment Coalition Kevin Stein said.

Stein said lenders are asking survivors to speak with their deceased spouse, which is ridiculous.

He said existing protections are not working for survivors. Eighty percent of housing counselors surveyed said they had clients with problems the bill would solve.

But spokesman for the California Mortgage Bankers Association Dustin Hobbs said the bill poses a risk to lenders who would not be able to do necessary underwriting.

“It’s a major risk,” Hobbs said.

If a survivor becomes the borrower and desires to prevent a foreclosure, the lender would be writing a new loan to a new borrower rather than modifying an original loan with the original borrower, Hobbs said.

But Stein said that’s a misreading of the bill. Stein said survivors have no guarantee of getting a new loan or loan modification.

“It guarantees a fair process,” Stein said.

The bill clarifies the lender’s responsibilities, the senator’s office said. Survivors must receive accurate information about assuming the loan and about foreclosure prevention.

The bill gives survivors a single point of contact at a lender and the opportunity to simultaneously apply for loan modification and assumption.

Source: San Jose Mercury News

Additional Resource:
CA SB 1150 (full text)

Allen County Making Progress on Land Bank

Land Bank Update
February 4, 2016

LIMA — Work is continuing on getting the Allen County Land Reutilization Corporation, or land bank, up and running, with county commissioners passing two resolutions Thursday to help get the framework in place.

Commissioners approved a motion to place two commissioners on the land bank’s board of directors, as required by Ohio law. Jay Begg and Cory Noonan will serve in that capacity. The Ohio Revised Code also requires that the county treasurer, a representative from the largest municipality in the county as well as one representative for townships with populations over 10,000, which would be American and Shawnee townships, in this case.

“It used to be that just the largest township got to appoint a representative,” county treasurer Rachael Gilroy said. “But now, the law says any township over 10,000 residents gets to be in on the decision, and between the townships, they must appoint a representative between them. So that brought in Shawnee Township to the table.”

Both townships decided on American Township zoning inspector Bill Haidle as their representative,with Lima’s director of community development, Amy Sackman Odum, representing the city.

Commissioners also aproved the designation of 5 percent of all tax delinquent interest and penalty payments to go to the land bank to cover administrative costs.

“That will be our operating expense and possibly demolitions that would not apply under this (Hardest Hit Fund) grant,” she said. “The grant we’re hoping to apply for only applies to residential properties, and it can do apartment buildings, but only if it has one to four units. But there are so many places that have a commercial building that needs to come down, and this money would help us get that funding to bring those down.”

By establishing a land bank, the county hopes to put itself in a position to receive as much as $4 million or $5 million from the Hardest Hit Fund to demolish blighted properties in the county.

Source: limaohio.com