FEMA Evaluating Demolition Funds for Tornado-Damaged Properties in St. Louis

Industry Update
March 4, 2026

Source: www.stlpr.org

The Federal Emergency Management Agency told St. Louis it will not pay for most building demolitions the city wanted covered.

In a February letter obtained by St. Louis Public Radio, the federal agency said it would not reimburse the city for demolishing several kinds of buildings that are common in the tornado’s path, including vacant properties condemned before the tornado and properties where the owner also owns other properties.

“If we look at the total amount of damaged properties that are likely needing demolition, we estimate that maybe 20% of it will be eligible under the interpretations of this letter,” St. Louis Chief Recovery Officer Julian Nicks told STLPR.

FEMA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The EF3 tornado ripped through north St. Louis on May 16, damaging an estimated 10,000 properties in some of the city’s poorest neighborhoods.

The city’s correspondence with FEMA shows the city plans to demolish 1,000 buildings that were damaged by the tornado and are considered dangerous.

Mayor Cara Spencer and Nicks asked FEMA to expand eligibility to demolish vacant or condemned buildings in a Dec. 8 letter, arguing that the properties cause a public health and safety threat and therefore qualify for FEMA’s Private Property Debris Removal program.

In a response on Feb. 3, regional FEMA administrator Catherine R. Sanders said demolition of structures condemned before the major disaster would not be eligible for reimbursement, citing a FEMA guidance document that has been in place since the Biden administration.

Nicks would not give specific numbers of buildings that would not qualify but said the city would be releasing that information in the coming days. Without federal funding, Nicks said the city will have to tap either the $100 million of state funding or city funding.

“Every dollar that we don’t get covered by FEMA is a dollar that has to come from somewhere else that can’t be used for all those other purposes that we know are much needed in our recovery,” Nicks said.

A state bill passed not long after the tornado allocated roughly $100 million in funding toward recovery efforts in St. Louis, but the city has not used that money. Currently, legislators are considering allocating an additional $86 million as part of the state supplemental budget.

The February letter from FEMA also laid out other guidance that could disqualify large numbers of St. Louis properties for demolition reimbursement. The federal agency defines private residential properties as buildings with four or fewer units. It does not cover commercial structures and considers multiple structures owned by the same entity to be commercial, regardless of the number of units.

That would include landlords with multiple properties in the tornado area, or families living in multiple homes that are all owned by one person.

This policy is designed to require people with means to pay for their own repairs. But Nicks said it presents a specific challenge in north St. Louis for families that inherited their homes and act as a caretaker for more than one property.

Nicks said this new information would not change St. Louis’ timeline to start working on demolitions. The city still plans to start broader-scale demolitions in March and ramp them up over the next few months.

“From my standpoint, I don’t care what FEMA wants to fund, what FEMA doesn’t want to fund,” Nicks said. “What we care about is, what does a holistic recovery look like for people who are impacted by the tornado? For most of ours, that’s not demo and debris, it is repair.”

The FEMA Private Property Debris Removal program is being handled by Missouri, and the state is still selecting a company to do that work.

According to STL Recovers’ demolition dashboard, around 361 requested demolitions are being examined for their total scope of work. The state is contracting out around 96 demolitions and the city 55. Ten months after the tornado, the city has completed only 31 demolitions, Nicks told STLPR.

In total, the city received roughly 4,200 applications for a variety of different property assistance related to tornado damage. That can vary from demolitions and debris cleanup to repairs. However, the city’s repair program has also struggled to take flight as officials try to “build an airplane while it’s flying,” Nicks said.

Meanwhile, city residents complain that the pace of recovery in north city is slow. At recent town halls and committee meetings, residents appeared in force calling for St. Louis to do more for the tornado-impacted area, even calling for Spencer and the Board of Aldermen to tap into the roughly $280 million of Rams settlement money.

Nicks, Spencer and other members of the St. Louis Recovery Office say they understand work has been slow but are confident that in coming months the city will make progress in “visible” ways in the neighborhoods.

“If we want people to believe ‘my neighborhood has a future,’ they have to both believe that they can stay, they have to believe that the properties that are preservable in their area will come back and be populated, and they have to believe that the vacant properties won’t become eyesores the way that LRA properties and other vacant properties have been in a neighborhood,” Nicks said.

The vacant property problem

Vacant properties make up a good deal of the buildings that need to be knocked down. The recovery office estimates nearly half of the buildings that will need demolition were vacant before the tornado, which makes them almost all “universally ineligible” for demolition through FEMA funding.

Nicks said most of those buildings hadn’t been cared for structurally, meaning when the tornado hit they were more likely to be structurally compromised. But, he said that they were still damaged by the tornado in a way that he thought would make their demolition eligible for FEMA reimbursement.

“Condemnation doesn’t mean the building was unsafe before,” Nicks said. “It may have needed braces or investment that could have made it a structurally safe structure that now is a fully collapsed structure. So even then condemnation does not equal ‘it needed demolition pre-tornado.’”

Sanders, from FEMA, said in the Feb. 3 letter that vacant structures that weren’t previously condemned could qualify for FEMA demolition if the tornado made them an immediate health or safety threat.

Vacant properties have long been a thorn in the city’s side. The St. Louis Vacancy Collaborative estimates roughly 22,000 properties in the city are possibly vacant. The collaborative is confident that about 14,000 of those properties are definitely vacant.

In the neighborhoods impacted by the tornado, the collaborative’s data estimates at least 1,787 are vacant.

Tracking vacant properties is a challenge, as the city doesn’t compile the data itself. The collaborative scrapes city data from the building division, the assessor’s office, the Forestry division and the Citizens’ Service Bureau to determine if a property is vacant.

 

For full report, please click the source link above.

 

Q4 Update: Delinquencies, Foreclosures and REO

Industry Update
March 3, 2026

Source: CalculatedRisk Newsletter

Even with the recent weakness in house prices, it is important to note that there will NOT be a surge in foreclosures that could lead to cascading house price declines (as happened following the housing bubble) for two key reasons: 1) mortgage lending has been solid, and 2) most homeowners have substantial equity in their homes.

With substantial equity, and low mortgage rates (mostly at a fixed rates), few homeowners will have financial difficulties.

But it is still important to track delinquencies and foreclosures.

Here is some data on REOs through Q4 2025 …

The dollar value of 1-4 family residential Real Estate Owned (REOs, foreclosure houses) was up 26% YOY from $790 million in Q4 2024 to $998 million in Q4 2025. This is still historically very low, but increasing.

Fannie Mae reported the number of REOs decreased to 4,519 at the end of Q4 2025, up slightly from 4,496 at the end of the previous quarter, and down 23% year-over-year from 5,895 in Q4 2024. Here is a graph of Fannie Real Estate Owned (REO).

This is very low and well below the pre-pandemic levels. REOs are a lagging indicator. REOs increase when borrowers struggle financially and have little or no equity, so they can’t sell their homes – as happened after the housing bubble. That will not happen this time.

Here is some data on delinquencies …

It is important to note that loans in forbearance are counted as delinquent in the various surveys but not reported to the credit agencies.

The percent of loans in the foreclosure process increased year-over-year from 0.45 percent in Q4 2024 to 0.53 percent in Q4 2025 (red) but remains historically low.

From the MBA:

Compared to last quarter, the seasonally adjusted mortgage delinquency rate increased for all loans outstanding. By stage, the 30-day delinquency rate decreased 5 basis points to 2.07 percent, the 60-day delinquency rate increased 16 basis points to 0.92 percent, and the 90-day delinquency bucket increased 16 basis points to 1.27 percent.

The delinquency rate includes loans that are at least one payment past due but does not include loans in the process of foreclosure. The percentage of loans in the foreclosure process at the end of the fourth quarter was 0.53 percent, up 3 basis points from the third quarter of 2025 and 8 basis points higher than one year ago.

Both Fannie and Freddie release serious delinquency (90+ days) data monthly.

These are mortgage loans that are “three monthly payments or more past due or in foreclosure”. The recent increase is almost back to pre-pandemic levels.

The pandemic related increase in serious delinquencies was very different from the increase in delinquencies following the housing bubble. Lending standards have been fairly solid over the last decade, and most of these homeowners had equity in their homes – and they were able to restructure their loans once they were employed.

And on foreclosures …

ICE reported that active foreclosures are still very low but have increased recently.

While foreclosure activity remains low by historical standards, 2025 saw about 401,000 loans referred to foreclosure, up 25% year over year and the highest annual total since 2019.

December alone brought 40,000 foreclosure starts, the third-highest monthly tally of the year, with activity picking up noticeably in the final months.

Foreclosure inventory climbed by 47,000 (+25%) in 2025, reaching its highest level since 2023, driven by a sharp rise in FHA loans entering foreclosure (+59%).

Foreclosure sales also moved higher, with 80,000 sales in 2025 (+17% YoY) — the biggest volume since 2019 — and 2,100 sales in December, up 41% from last year.

 

For full report, please click the source link above.

 

Fannie and Freddie: Single Family Delinquency Rate Increased in January

Industry Update
February 26, 2026

Source: CalculatedRisk Newsletter

In general, single family delinquency rates are low.

Freddie Mac reported that the Single-Family serious delinquency rate in January was 0.60%, up from 0.59% December. Freddie’s rate is down year-over-year from 0.61% in January 2025. The December delinquency rate is at the pre-pandemic level of 0.60%.

Freddie’s serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 4.20% following the housing bubble and peaked at 3.17% in August 2020 during the pandemic.

Fannie Mae reported that the Single-Family serious delinquency rate in January was 0.59%, up from 0.58% in December. The serious delinquency rate is up year-over-year from 0.57% in January 2025, however, this is below the pre-pandemic lows of 0.65%.

The Fannie Mae serious delinquency rate peaked in February 2010 at 5.59% following the housing bubble and peaked at 3.32% in August 2020 during the pandemic.

These are mortgage loans that are “three monthly payments or more past due or in foreclosure”. Mortgages in forbearance are being counted as delinquent in this monthly report but are not reported to the credit bureaus.

For Fannie, by vintage, for loans made in 2004 or earlier (1% of portfolio), 1.44% are seriously delinquent (up from 1.42% the previous month).

For loans made in 2005 through 2008 (1% of portfolio), 2.07% are seriously delinquent (up from 2.03%).

For recent loans, originated in 2009 through 2025 (98% of portfolio), 0.54% are seriously delinquent (up from 0.53%). So, Fannie is still working through a handful of poor performing loans from the bubble years.

 

For full report, please click the source link above.

 

Lucas County Treasurer Creates Two New Programs to Help Tackle Dilapidated, Delinquent Homes

One Community Update
February 2, 2026

Source: abc13.com

The Lucas County Treasurer is launching a program she says could turn tax-delinquent properties into a source for economic development.

Tax delinquency sometimes goes hand in hand with abandoned and run-down properties.

Lucas County Treasurer Lindsay Webb is launching two new programs to help get delinquent problem properties back on the market and revitalized.

People often approach Webb asking about foreclosing on blighted homes.

“If I’m at a block watch meeting, sometimes when I’m at the grocery store, or on Facebook, any number of places,” Webb said.

Now there is a formal process online: the Treasurer Request program.

Lucas County residents can report properties that are tax delinquent and have a negative effect on the community. Webb may not foreclose on every property submitted, but she will always review the request.

“If foreclosure is the right tool, it’s a tool I’m willing to use,” Webb said.

The second new initiative is the Foreclosure Request program.

Webb says it’s a tool for economic development, and goes a step further than the treasurer’s request.

She used an example of a business owner located next door to a dilapidated house they want cleaned up.

Through Foreclosure Requests, the business can put their money where their mouth is and commit to cleaning it up themselves if it goes up for sale.

It’s not just for business owners. Anyone can submit a vacant or underused tax delinquent property they want to purchase. If approved for foreclosure, approved purchasers need to put down a $5,000 deposit per parcel to cover foreclosure-related costs and commit to bidding on it at the Sheriff’s Sale.

According to the Lucas County Treasurer’s website, the opening bid at the Sheriff’s Sale will include all delinquent taxes, assessments, interest, and court, title, and administrative costs required by law.

The deposits will be refunded once the property is fixed up or if the person who submitted the request does not successfully win at the Sheriff’s Sale.

“If the sheriff’s sale can put tax delinquent property back on the tax rolls and in the hands of good community members and people who care about their surroundings, that’s what I want,” Webb said.

The programs are a part of creating new ways to tackle the blight. Turning an eyesore into a potential neighborhood gem.

The foreclosure request program is launching next month, when Webb says the Sheriff’s Sale moves online.

 

For full report, please click the source link above.

FHA Pushes Ahead with Affordable Housing Mission

One Community Update
February 16, 2026

Source: Williamson Herald

The Franklin Housing Authority is continuing its mission of making housing affordable for low-income residents despite changing times.

Derwin Jackson, president and chief executive officer of the FHA, said shifts in investing and federal funding since the COVID-19 pandemic have made things tricky for him and his staff.

“We’ve seen changes in investors and how they’re investing in low-income housing,” he said. “With what we pay on the dollar for tax credits, we’ve gone from getting 90 cents to a dollar down to 84 to 76 cents on the dollar. That means you don’t get as much equity to build housing.”

The FHA accepts Section 8, mainstream, and VASH housing vouchers. It also participates in the Homeless No More rental assistance program, which the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development administers.

The FHA also partners with more than 50 community organizations, including churches, domestic violence shelters, and the 21st District Recovery Court, to find housing for those in need.

Jackson said housing costs are skyrocketing nationwide for both buyers and renters.

“We all know housing is something that is an issue across the country, not just in Franklin,” he said. “Renting houses, those costs have gone up. Costs are sky-high for homeowners. It’s hard to find a place to live.”

Jackson commented that federal and state funds have been cut for family assistance programs that help people get jobs, learn to save, and access other essential services for people in need.

“We see those programs drying up and threatening to be cut,” he said. “But we have to keep hope alive for the people we serve.”

Part of that hope lies in God, Jackson said, as well as advocating for affordable housing needs at the state capitol.

“We need to stand up and make it known what is needed,” he said. “Our elected officials speak for us.”

Jackson said future initiatives include the proposed Bousquet Place development on Fifth Avenue North, which would consist of up to 44 workforce and affordable housing units.

Jackson praised Williamson County Mayor Rogers Anderson, Franklin Mayor Ken Moore, and the city’s alderpersons for their support of FHA, particularly with the Franklin Flats development and other projects.

“I’ve been here 19 years, and they have been such supporters of affordable housing,” Jackson said. “Franklin has done as much as they can.”

 

For full report, please click the source link above.

Metcalfe Park Program Rescues Foreclosed Homes

One Community Update
February 17, 2026

Source: Urban Milwaukee

Metcalfe Park Community Bridges, a North Side nonprofit, is showcasing the power of resident-led action through its Reclaim and Restore initiative.

Launched in 2025, the initiative was designed to stabilize the Metcalfe Park neighborhood by turning vacant, city-owned foreclosed properties into affordable homeownership opportunities for current residents.

Reclaim and Restore rehabilitates city-owned foreclosed homes and makes them available exclusively to Metcalfe Park residents through a lease-to-own model. Participants lease the homes at an affordable monthly rate for 15 years before assuming full ownership, creating a pathway to long-term housing stability.

The first two homes were transformed through the program in June and October of last year. A third home was completed a few weeks ago. Melody McCurtis, deputy director of Metcalfe Park Community Bridges, said that a fourth house is in the process of being renovated.

“This program is a direct reflection of how community voices add value,” said Milwaukee County Supervisor Marcelia Nicholson in a statement shared at the group’s news conference. “It’s what it looks like when divestment follows community.”

Reclaim and Restore

At an event in late January, the organization unveiled a newly restored five-bedroom, 2.5-bathroom home on North 33rd Street and revealed the individuals selected through a lottery process to move into the property.

The lucky winners were Shirley and Tyrone Dunn.

The couple have lived just a block away in a rental home for the past eight years. Shirley Dunn, an active community member, said the opportunity represents a chance to remain rooted in the neighborhood they have long called home. Her husband said he also plans to be more involved.

“I’ve watched my wife volunteer for years,” Tyrone Dunn said. “Now I’m going to have to get started.”

Through the lease-to-own program, the Dunns will pay $901 per month for 15 years, after which they will own the home outright.

Community efforts

Ald. Russell Stamper said that the success of Reclaim and Restore is driven by community-centered planning and resident involvement. From identifying properties to shaping program guidelines, neighborhood voices have been central to every step of the process.

“Our neighborhoods showcase not only the history but the future of Milwaukee,” he said. “That’s exactly what the Reclaim and Restore initiative highlights.”

He noted that the initiative not only improves housing stock but also helps prevent displacement by ensuring homes remain accessible to longtime residents.

A blueprint for others

Representatives from the city, state and community organizations attending the announcement event for the initiative described Reclaim and Restore as a blueprint for other cities grappling with vacant properties and housing insecurity.

“This is what leadership looks like,” said state Rep. Margaret Arney (D-Wauwatosa). “The best policies come from the community, and now we have a model for something possible all over the county.”

Fellows from the Legal Defense Fund flew in from Atlanta to see the work being done.

By combining public assets, community leadership and long-term affordability, they said the model demonstrates how neighborhoods can reclaim control of their future.

Danell Cross, executive director of Metcalfe Park Community Bridges, said the first two homes were restored with private donations. Though the organization received grant funding for the current homes being restored, growing interest from residents and housing advocates mean it needs more help to continue to expand, she said.

Cross hopes the initiative will keep strengthening both the housing market and the sense of community in Metcalfe Park.

 

For full report, please click the source link above.

Zombie Foreclosure Rates by State – Q1 2026

Industry Update
February 20, 2026

Source: ATTOM

What Is the Current Percentage of Zombie Foreclosures in the U.S.?

In the first quarter of 2026, the share of zombie foreclosures across the United States remained relatively stable compared to recent quarters.

Residential Properties Nationwide in the Process of Foreclosure: 230,401

Percentage of Zombie Foreclosures: 3.27 percent of residential properties in the foreclosure process were considered “zombie” properties — homes that sit vacant while in pre-foreclosure status.

What’s Driving Q1 2026 Zombie Foreclosure Trends?

Zombie foreclosure rates remain historically low in the first quarter of 2026, reflecting continued housing demand and homeowner equity strength. While foreclosure volumes have shifted modestly, most properties entering the foreclosure pipeline are not being abandoned during the pre-foreclosure process.

Zombie Foreclosure Rates by State – Q1 2026

Below is the complete state-by-state ranking for the first quarter of 2026, listing each state’s share of zombie foreclosure properties and the top four counties leading in percentage of total vacant properties.

  1. South Dakota

17.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (5 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Minnehaha

  1. Kansas

10.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (62 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Wyandotte, Shawnee, Sedgwick, Johnson

  1. Iowa

7.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (93 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Black Hawk, Scott, Linn, Polk

  1. Missouri

6.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (54 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Saint Louis City, Saint Louis, Jackson, Greene

  1. Oregon

6.7 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (44 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Multnomah, Jackson, Marion, Lane

  1. New Mexico

6.5 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (41 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Santa Fe, Bernalillo, Dona Ana, Sandoval

  1. Indiana

6.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (207 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Lake, Marion, St Joseph, Vanderburgh

  1. Ohio

6.2 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (589 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Mahoning, Lucas, Cuyahoga, Montgomery

  1. Oklahoma

6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (72 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Oklahoma, Tulsa, Cleveland, Canadian

  1. Maryland

5.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (115 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Baltimore City, Baltimore, Prince George’s County, Worcester

  1. Alaska

5.5 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (7 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Anchorage

  1. Nebraska

5.1 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (12 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Douglas, Lancaster, Sarpy

  1. Wyoming

5.1 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (4 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: No data available

  1. North Dakota

4.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (6 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: No data available

  1. Illinois

4.4 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (676 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Saint Clair, Peoria, Madison, Rock Island

  1. Alabama

4.4 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (34 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Montgomery, Jefferson, Mobile, Tuscaloosa

  1. Nevada

4.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (66 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Clark, Washoe

  1. Hawaii

4.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (68 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Hawaii, Honolulu, Maui

  1. Montana

3.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (4 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Yellowstone

  1. Pennsylvania

3.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (219 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Schuylkill, Beaver, Allegheny, Luzerne

  1. Washington

3.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (61 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Spokane, Pierce, Yakima, Kitsap

  1. Maine

3.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (24 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Penobscot, York, Cumberland

  1. Arkansas

3.7 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (6 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Pulaski, Washington, Benton

  1. Idaho

3.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (16 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Ada, Kootenai, Canyon

  1. Florida

3.5 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (2300 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Pinellas, Sarasota, Collier, Volusia

  1. Michigan

3.4 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (60 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Wayne, Genesee, Saginaw, Berrien

  1. Arizona

3.4 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (72 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Pima, Mohave, Maricopa, Yuma

  1. New York

3.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (1382 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Broome, Niagara, Oneida, Schenectady

  1. Mississippi

3.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (4 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Hinds, Harrison, De Soto

  1. Texas

2.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (177 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Jefferson, Lubbock, Galveston, Nueces

  1. Kentucky

2.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (23 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Jefferson, Kenton, Fayette

  1. Colorado

2.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (47 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Pueblo, Denver, Arapahoe, Boulder

  1. Virginia

2.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (29 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Richmond City, Norfolk City, Virginia Beach City, Arlington

  1. Minnesota

2.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (25 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Saint Louis, Hennepin, Ramsey, Olmsted

  1. Wisconsin

2.5 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (34 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Milwaukee, Winnebago, Rock, Racine

  1. North Carolina

2.4 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (61 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Forsyth, Gaston, Cumberland, New Hanover

  1. Delaware

2.4 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (13 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: New Castle, Kent, Sussex

  1. Georgia

2.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (51 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Bibb, Richmond, Muscogee, Clayton

  1. Tennessee

2.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (15 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Shelby, Hamilton, Sullivan, Montgomery

  1. Louisiana

2.2 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (27 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Caddo, Calcasieu, East Baton Rouge, Orleans

  1. South Carolina

2.2 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (130 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Beaufort, Horry, Anderson, Aiken

  1. California

2.1 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (313 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Riverside, Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, San Diego

  1. Utah

1.7 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (26 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Washington, Salt Lake, Weber, Utah

  1. Massachusetts

1.7 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (48 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Barnstable, Berkshire, Suffolk, Essex

  1. Connecticut

1.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (9 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Southeastern Connecticut, South Central Connecticut, Naugatuck Valley, Greater Bridgeport

  1. New Jersey

0.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (199 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Cape May, Middlesex, Atlantic, Essex

  1. Rhode Island

0.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (1 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Washington, Kent, Providence

  1. New Hampshire

0.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (0 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Rockingham, Hillsborough

  1. Vermont

0.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (0 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Chittenden

  1. West Virginia

0.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the first quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (0 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Kanawha

Zombie foreclosures remain a small share of overall foreclosure activity nationwide in Q1 2026. States at the top of the ranking continue to post higher zombie foreclosure rates relative to others, though overall levels remain low by historical standards.

 

For full report, please click the source link above.

 

FEMA Emergency Management Declaration – District of Columbia (DC) Sewer Line Collapse

FEMA Alert
February 20, 2026

FEMA has issued an Emergency Management Declaration for the District of Columbia to supplement response efforts due to emergency conditions resulting from a sewer line collapse beginning January 19, 2026 and continuing.  The following counties have been approved for assistance:

Public Assistance:

  • District of Columbia

 

District of Columbia (DC) Sewer Line Collapse (EM-3643-DC)

President Donald J. Trump Approves Emergency Declaration for the District of Columbia

List of Affected Zip Codes

 

Additional Resources

FEMA’s web site

FEMA’s Disaster Declaration Process

Safeguard Properties Industry Alerts

HUD Moratorium on Foreclosure

VA’s Policy Regarding Natural Disasters

Freddie Mac Disaster Relief Policies

Fannie Mae’s Natural Disaster Relief Policies

FEMA Fire Management Assistance Declaration – Oklahoma Hospital Road Fire

FEMA Alert
February 19, 2026

FEMA has issued a Fire Management Assistance Declaration for the state of Oklahoma to supplement state, tribal and local recovery efforts in areas affected by the Hospital Road Fire on February 19, 2026.  The following counties have been approved for assistance:

Public Assistance:

  • Carter

 

Oklahoma Hospital Road Fire (FM-5620-OK)

List of Affected Zip Codes

 

Additional Resources

FEMA’s web site

FEMA’s Disaster Declaration Process

Safeguard Properties Industry Alerts

HUD Moratorium on Foreclosure

VA’s Policy Regarding Natural Disasters

Freddie Mac Disaster Relief Policies

Fannie Mae’s Natural Disaster Relief Policies

FEMA Fire Management Assistance Declaration – Oklahoma Rattlesnake Fire

FEMA Alert
February 19, 2026

FEMA has issued a Fire Management Assistance Declaration for the state of Oklahoma to supplement state, tribal and local recovery efforts in areas affected by the Rattlesnake Fire on February 19, 2026.  The following counties have been approved for assistance:

Public Assistance:

  • Osage
  • Washington

 

Oklahoma Rattlesnake Fire (FM-5621-OK)

List of Affected Zip Codes

 

Additional Resources

FEMA’s web site

FEMA’s Disaster Declaration Process

Safeguard Properties Industry Alerts

HUD Moratorium on Foreclosure

VA’s Policy Regarding Natural Disasters

Freddie Mac Disaster Relief Policies

Fannie Mae’s Natural Disaster Relief Policies