Reaping a Recovery

Editorial
July 29, 2016

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s release of Mortgagee Letter 2016-02 this year marked an important step in bridging the gap between investor requirements and mortgage field services best practices. It provided one standard of property preservation across the country, addressing issues like the need for additional allowables, conveyance timeframes and mold remediation, just to name a few. HUD’s Mortgagee Letter 2016-02 also updated guidelines focusing on the importance of the hazard insurance recovery process and the role the hazard insurance recovery vendor plays in this process. It requires mortgage servicers to pursue insurance recovery and to make repairs with hazard claim settlements. To comply, all lenders and mortgage servicers need to ensure they have a qualified mortgage field services provider with a dedicated staff that handles the hazard insurance recovery process to maximize recovery and reduce losses.

The mortgage field services partner plays an important role in the hazard recovery process. They are the eyes and ears of the mortgage servicer and the hazard recovery vendor. Additionally, damages are discovered when the mortgage field services provider is completing inspection and preservation services. This discovery triggers the hazard insurance recovery process.

IMPORTANCE OF IDENTIFYING AND CATEGORIZING DAMAGE
When the initial inspection or preservation services are completed and damages are identified, it is important that these results contain the necessary documentation so the mortgage servicer, or its hazard recovery vendor, can make a determination on whether or not to file a hazard insurance claim. The documentation should include the following information:

Type of peril – Damages must be classified correctly. For example, broken pipes can be from theft or vandalism, freeze damage or mortgagor neglect or wear and tear. How the damage is reported can affect whether or not a mortgage servicer or their hazard provider will initiate a claim. It also may affect how the hazard insurance company views the claim and whether or not coverage is provided under the policy.

Description of the damage with an estimated cost to repair – Mortgage servicers need to know what is damaged, are the items missing or damaged, where the damage is located and an estimated cost to repair. Missing or damaged fixtures that are cosmetic in nature with a low estimated cost to repair may not result in a claim being initiated. For example, missing door knobs on the interior door or light fixtures can be low cost and considered a cosmetic issue, which will not justify a claim being initiated. Items considered essential to the home, like hot water tanks, furnace, plumbing systems, toilets and air conditioning condensing units have a higher cost and typically would justify initiating a claim. Sufficient details must be provided so the mortgage servicer or its hazard vendor makes an appropriate decision on whether to initiate a claim.

Date of discovery – The date the damage condition is discovered needs to be timely and accurately reported. This can significantly affect what policy was in force at the time of the loss. Inaccurate information can affect the amount of out-of-pocket costs the mortgage servicer may incur (deductible) or the timely resolution of the claim (if you file with the wrong carrier, you may have to refile). If the claim is not submitted in a timely manner, coverage can be denied.

Photos – Detailed photos that support the damage condition being reported are essential. These photos are key information the mortgage servicer or its hazard vendor need to verify the extent and cause of the damage. Photos memorialize the damages so if another event occurs there is documentation of the condition in support of the claim that was initiated. It also can significantly help in expediting the settlement of the claim and, in some cases, the hazard insurance company may issue settlement specifically based on the photos of the damage.

SCOPE VERIFICATION
Once the claim has been concluded, the mortgage servicer needs its mortgage field services provider to confirm the scope and pricing issued by the insurance company accurately reflects the damages. It is important to engage a mortgage field services provider that is knowledgeable and has a skilled network of vendors that understand how the hazard insurance companies issue settlements and the documents that reflect what has been covered. The insurance carrier will typically issue two sets of documents — the Explanation of Benefits (EOB) and a scope of work that is an itemized estimate of the work. The EOB outlines the coverage provided and breaks down the settlement. It will detail if there are conditions that were not covered and if there is recoverable depreciation that can be claimed after repairs have been completed. The scope of work will provide a detailed estimate of what repairs the insurance company has estimated need to be completed to address the damages and the allowable costs.

The mortgage field services provider will need to evaluate the EOB and the scope of work from the insurance company and engage a qualified vendor to verify the accuracy of the settlement that was issued by the hazard insurance company. If the settlement is found to be deficient in pricing or scope of work to be completed, the mortgage field services provider needs to be able to prepare a package of information that the mortgage servicer or their hazard recovery vendor can present to the hazard insurance company for consideration.

This should include:

  • An itemized estimate that clearly outlines what work was not covered in the scope or work provided by the hazard insurance company or that is not priced properly. The estimate should not duplicate items that are covered in the hazard insurance company’s scope of work and only include items that were missed by the insurance adjuster or not priced properly.
  • Photos of the items that were not covered in the scope of work. These photos should clearly support the claim that the items are missing or damaged.
  • If local code requires additional work or upgrades providing documentation from the local authority or the actual wording from the building code needs to be provided along with any other documentation supporting the claim.

COMPLETING INSURANCE REPAIRS
With HUD’s requirement to seek insurance recovery and complete repairs with the funds recovered, it is important that mortgage servicers have engaged a mortgage field services provider that has a network of vendors that can complete the repairs. Work must be completed in a timely manner and in accordance with the scope of work that was issued. If the work is not done correctly the mortgage servicer may face the following issues:

  • Delay in completing the work may result in the mortgage servicer being unable to claim the recoverable depreciation.
  • Incomplete repairs may result in the insurance carrier only issuing only a partial settlement for the recoverable depreciation.
  • Incomplete work can result in HUD issuing a reconveyance.

The mortgage field services provider needs to have a network of vendors that are knowledgeable and trained to handle repairs based on insurance settlements. A dedicated team with a quality control process that ensures all work has been completed in accordance with the scope of work will eliminate loss of recoverable depreciation funds and minimize reconveyances.

While HUD’s Mortgagee Letter 2016- 02 took great strides to improve property maintenance issues, hazard insurance recovery still remains a delicate process. Only skilled, knowledgeable mortgage field services providers with vendor networks trained to understand the process will prevent losses, improve conveyance timelines and increase financial recoveries. Those providers who have deep claims expertise are imperative for maximizing hazard insurance recovery and ensuring damages are properly mitigated at the property.

Source: DS News (Reaping a Recovery [pdf])

x

CEO

Alan Jaffa

Alan Jaffa is the Chief Executive Officer for Safeguard Properties, steering the company as the mortgage field services industry leader. He also serves on the board of advisors for SCG Partners, a middle-market private equity fund focused on diversifying and expanding Safeguard Properties’ business model into complimentary markets.

Alan joined Safeguard in 1995, learning the business from the ground up. He was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in 2002, and was named CEO in May 2010. His hands-on experience has given him unique insights as a leader to innovate, improve and strengthen Safeguard’s processes to assure that the company adheres to the highest standards of quality and customer service.

Under Alan’s leadership, Safeguard has grown significantly with strategies that have included new and expanded services, technology investments that deliver higher quality and greater efficiency to clients, and strategic acquisitions. He takes a team approach to process improvement, involving staff at all levels of the organization to address issues, brainstorm solutions, and identify new and better ways to serve clients.

In 2008, Alan was recognized by Crain’s Cleveland Business in its annual “40-Under-40” profile of young leaders. He also was named a NEO Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year® Award finalist in 2013.

x

Esq., General Counsel and EVP

Linda Erkkila

Linda Erkkila is the General Counsel and Executive Vice President for Safeguard Properties, with oversight of legal, human resources, training, and compliance. Linda’s broad scope of oversight covers regulatory issues that impact Safeguard’s operations, risk mitigation, strategic planning, human resources and training initiatives, compliance, insurance, litigation and claims management, and counsel related to mergers, acquisition and joint ventures.

Linda assures that Safeguard’s strategic initiatives align with its resources, leverage opportunities across the company, and contemplate compliance mandates. She has practiced law for 25 years and her experience, both as outside and in-house counsel, covers a wide range of corporate matters, including regulatory disclosure, corporate governance compliance, risk assessment, compensation and benefits, litigation management, and mergers and acquisitions.

Linda earned her JD at Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. She holds a degree in economics from Miami University and an MBA. Linda was previously named as both a “Woman of Influence” by HousingWire and as a “Leading Lady” by MReport.

x

COO

Michael Greenbaum

Michael Greenbaum is the Chief Operating Officer of Safeguard Properties, where he has played a pivotal role since joining the company in July 2010. Initially brought on as Vice President of REO, Mike’s exceptional leadership and strategic vision quickly propelled him to Vice President of Operations in 2013, and ultimately to COO in 2015. Over his 14-year tenure at Safeguard, Mike has been instrumental in driving change and fostering innovation within the Property Preservation sector, consistently delivering excellence and becoming a trusted partner to clients and investors.

A distinguished graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, Mike earned a degree in Quantitative Economics. Following his graduation, he served in the U.S. Army’s Ordnance Branch, where he specialized in supply chain management. Before his tenure at Safeguard, Mike honed his expertise by managing global supply chains for 13 years, leveraging his military and civilian experience to lead with precision and efficacy.

x

CFO

Joe Iafigliola

Joe Iafigliola is the Chief Financial Officer for Safeguard Properties. Joe is responsible for the Control, Quality Assurance, Business Development, Marketing, Accounting, and Information Security departments. At the core of his responsibilities is the drive to ensure that Safeguard’s focus remains rooted in Customer Service = Resolution. Through his executive leadership role, he actively supports SGPNOW.com, an on-demand service geared towards real estate and property management professionals as well as individual home owners in need of inspection and property preservation services. Joe is also an integral force behind Compliance Connections, a branch of Safeguard Properties that allows code enforcement professionals to report violations at properties that can then be addressed by the Safeguard vendor network. Compliance Connections also researches and shares vacant property ordinance information with Safeguard clients.

Joe has an MBA from The Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University, is a Certified Management Accountant (CMA), and holds a bachelor’s degree from The Ohio State University’s Honors Accounting program.

x

Business Development

Carrie Tackett

Business Development Safeguard Properties